That Woman who shagged the dog

[robslappa]

Who licked the dogs out?

[Carradona]

Er, isn't that sort of what I'm asking?

 

You can kill animals, but you can't have sex with them.

You can have sex with humans, but you can't kill them.

 

Consistency: zero.

 

 

 

 

 

So you're saying sexual contact with animals is abuse, but killing them isn't?

 

Are you going to explain to me how you're being consistent?

 

 

 

 

Naturalistic fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Some people might think sex with you is repugnant, but I wouldn't choose to ban it.

 

 

 

 

Why don't you tell us what STDs can be caught cross-species, then?

 

 

 

 

You're an idiot.

 

I'm not going to put any more of my energy into a debate about whether or not it is morally correct for you to either touch a dogs cock or stick your needledick up it's poopshoot.

[Strontium]

Thanks for all admitting you have zero argument by resorting to childish namecalling.

 

No wonder this country is fucked when people can't use that fleshy thing between their ears.

[Guest TK-421]

Who licked the dogs out?

 

Heh, have some rep.

[Guest Numero Veinticinco]

Thanks for all admitting you have zero argument by resorting to childish namecalling.

 

No wonder this country is fucked when people can't use that fleshy thing between their ears.

 

Yeah, that's why the country is fucked!

[Section_31]

No, I'm all for consistency in our legal system. I cannot see a rationale for a blanket prohibition on sexual contact with animals while people are still permitted to kill and eat animals.

 

Fucking hell mate, you must be bored! Killing and eating animals is entirely natural, shagging them is not.

[Duff Man]

This story has really affected me. I just can't get over it at all. 5 years without the Internet. It's just unimaginable

[macc]

 

Er, isn't that sort of what I'm asking?

 

You can kill animals, but you can't have sex with them.

You can have sex with humans, but you can't kill them.

 

Consistency: zero.

 

So you're saying sexual contact with animals is abuse, but killing them isn't?

 

Are you going to explain to me how you're being consistent?

 

Naturalistic fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Some people might think sex with you is repugnant, but I wouldn't choose to ban it.

 

Why don't you tell us what STDs can be caught cross-species, then?

 

You're an idiot.

 

So which way do you want the consistency to go?? In favour of sexual urges or not??

[Steve Holt]

Thanks for all admitting you have zero argument by resorting to childish namecalling.

 

No wonder this country is fucked when people can't use that fleshy thing between their ears.

 

I love how, of all the problems in the world, one of your big ones is "I'm not allowed to fuck dogs". Get a grip.

[Carradona]

I fucking new Nick Clegg performed felatio on dogs.

[Guest TK-421]

Killing animals is obviously abuse but there is an end product, namely meat.

 

Fucking an animal is also abuse but there is no end product to justify the means. It is abuse for abuse's sake.

[Strontium]

Fucking hell mate, you must be bored! Killing and eating animals is entirely natural, shagging them is not.

 

 

How do you know what's "natural" and what isn't? Do you have a hotline to God?

 

I love how, of all the problems in the world, one of your big ones is "I'm not allowed to fuck dogs". Get a grip.

 

 

Thanks for proving my point. My problem is with people who cannot utilise their brains and follow simple logic. In this instance, "why is it okay to murder animals but not to touch them up" is the logical conundrum in question, but hardly anyone seems to want to confront the contradiction therein.

 

I was born 100 years too early.

[dennis tooth]

Er, isn't that sort of what I'm asking?

 

You can kill animals, but you can't have sex with them.

You can have sex with humans, but you can't kill them.

 

Consistency: zero.

 

 

 

 

 

So you're saying sexual contact with animals is abuse, but killing them isn't?

 

Are you going to explain to me how you're being consistent?

 

 

 

 

Naturalistic fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Some people might think sex with you is repugnant, but I wouldn't choose to ban it.

 

 

 

 

Why don't you tell us what STDs can be caught cross-species, then?

 

 

 

 

You're an idiot.

 

Actually that is entirely consistent if you have a brain and yer heds not full of shit that is. Lots of animals kill other animals and have sex with their own species.It's called natural selection and you bring us on to it quite nicely.........your one of them guys who a few years ago would neg Darwin.

 

 

You are a totally stubborn revisionist with less charm than Hitlers left testicle when he coughs.

[Carradona]

How do you know what's "natural" and what isn't? Do you have a hotline to God?

 

 

 

 

Thanks for proving my point. My problem is with people who cannot utilise their brains and follow simple logic. In this instance, "why is it okay to murder animals but not to touch them up" is the logical conundrum in question, but hardly anyone seems to want to confront the contradiction therein.

 

I was born 100 years too early.

 

If you're going to bring God (and therefore religion) into this, it seems perfectly fair to assume that it is natural to eat meat, given that Jesus ate the The Passover, which included lamb. He also eat fish.

 

However, there was nothing in the bible about him feeling up pigs or shagging dogs, was there?

[Steve Holt]

How do you know what's "natural" and what isn't? Do you have a hotline to God?

 

 

 

 

Thanks for proving my point. My problem is with people who cannot utilise their brains and follow simple logic. In this instance, "why is it okay to murder animals but not to touch them up" is the logical conundrum in question, but hardly anyone seems to want to confront the contradiction therein.

 

I was born 100 years too early.

 

An animal cannot consent, in much the same way as a child. It may have sexual desires toward a human and those may be reciprocated. But it is illegal for a human to have sex with any organism that cannot, by definition of law, give consent.

 

Until animals learn how to speak and govern themselves with a set of laws written by them, this will be the case.

 

Also murder is defined as the act of killing a human. You cannot murder an animal no matter how much you tree hugging hippies want to throw it at us. We kill other animals to eat. That has been something humans and every other animal has always done.

[Guest TK-421]

An animal cannot consent, in much the same way as a child. It may have sexual desires toward a human and those may be reciprocated. But it is illegal for a human to have sex with any organism that cannot, by definition of law, give consent.

 

Until animals learn how to speak and govern themselves with a set of laws written by them, this will be the case.

 

I dunno, man. You should have heard the way it was growling at me. The bitch was gagging for it.

[Steve Holt]

I dunno, man. You should have heard the way it was growling at me. The bitch was gagging for it.

 

Be careful dude, the lawyers will screw you. They have dog whisperers who will say she meant something different.

[dennis tooth]

If you're going to bring God (and therefore religion) into this, it seems perfectly fair to assume that it is natural to eat meat, given that Jesus ate the The Passover, which included lamb. He also eat fish.

 

However, there was nothing in the bible about him feeling up pigs or shagging dogs, was there?

 

Thou shalt not kill?

 

Sorry what was the question again?

[silverlining]

Strontium Dogfucker.

 

That's your new name.

[a stoner]

More woryingly is the bread of dog.

 

Surely doesnt mean a chow chow dog? How the fuck did a rottweiler bread with that?

 

Chow Chow (Rough) UK

 

Do you have to keep that one in the fridge or a special bin on the kitchen worktop?

[robslappa]

Thou shalt not kill?

 

Sorry what was the question again?

 

Thou shall not covet thy neighbour's Labrador.

[Whelan]

She looks a dirty bitch Strontium, fair play lad!

 

 

[bossy]

As a general rule, people in this country don't knowingly eat dogs. Or shag them.

[Section_31]

I think SD is not only fishing on this thread, he is an entire episode of Portland Bill.

[Trumo]

[YOUTUBE]JMrcnqKSbw8[/YOUTUBE]