Chris Eagles

[Fowlers God]

Yes he was a manc ( 6 or 7 games I think). But he was never fully fledged manc, Was he???? Any way, I have seen him at Burnley for the last year or so and he really catches my eye. But there seems to be more to him than what he is showing at the moment, I am sure with the correct training and coaching he could become great premiership player for years to come.

 

What do you guys think. Is he one for the future or would you take a shot at him now. Or because he was a manc does that mean you wouldnt want him?

[Brownie]

Sorry to say this, but I think he's shite.

[Hermes]

He struggles to get a game with Burnley.

[dirty_sanchez]

He's ok. Not for us though.

[FrenchEyeGlass]

hes a fanny who fannys about with the ball like a fanny.

 

saying that, we all like a bit of fanny now and then.

 

on a serious note, no.

[Furmedge]

Both these points from Brownie and Hermes, although different, are equally correct.

[The Golden Eel]

He struggles to get a game with Burnley.

 

Shouldn't though, cos he's easily their best attacking player. Says more about the manager than him IMO.

[hamstrung]

He's woeful. Really bad. There's no option that covers that.

 

Shouldn't though, cos he's easily their best attacking player. Says more about the manager than him IMO.

 

Don't think he was in the team regularly under the previous manager either.

['Kaka]

Shouldn't though, cos he's easily their best attacking player. Says more about the manager than him IMO.

 

True that.

 

Eagles is talented, but a right fanny. He is the very definition of "no end product".

 

Simply not good enough for us.

[Code]

I`m not advocating signing him, but he is a better player than quite a few of our so called squad players.

 

He`s played 30 out of 33 games for Burnley this season in the league, 18 starts.

 

Its just an indication, but he is also top of Burnley`s player ratings in SKY for the season, by some margin as well.

[hamstrung]

I`m not advocating signing him, but he is a better player than quite a few of our so called squad players.

.

 

He's not. He's playing for Burnley. He's probably not even as good as El Zhar (yes, he's that bad).

 

He's shit. And he looks like a boy band reject.

[dirty_sanchez]

Usher probably loves him though. Look at his hair.

[Fowlers God]

He's not. He's playing for Burnley. He's probably not even as good as El Zhar (yes, he's that bad).

 

He's shit. And he looks like a boy band reject.

 

Ouch Hamstrung. That is some damnation there.

 

People said that lennon had no end product until the start of this season. I am saying that he might not be given the best coaching where he is now.

[Magic Sponge]

Poor mans David Bentley.

[Trumo]

And he looks like a boy band reject.

 

Is the polite way of saying it.

[Guest Pistonbroke]

Scraping the barrel suggesting him.

[Byrnie]

He's a fucking fairy and he isn't anywhere near good enough.

[Marko121]

Can't believe that we are debating whether a Burnley player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club.

[05 Milan]

The Eagle has been branded - shite.

[The Golden Eel]

For a couple of months before Christmas he was really excellent, i'm not exaggerating to say he was one of the best players in teh league for that period... I don't know whether the chnage in manager affected him or what happened, but he seems to have dipped.

 

On the whole though, he's obviously not good enough for here, but he's definitely decent and much better than El Zhar. Much better... At least I've witnessed Eagles do something...

[Carradona]

Shite.

[Strontium]

Can't believe that we are debating whether a Burnley player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club.

 

 

Regardless of the merits or otherwise of Chris Eagles, what a ridiculous statement!

 

In 1971 would you have said "Can't believe that we are debating whether a Scunthorpe player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club"?

 

In 1980, would you have said "Can't believe that we are debating whether a Chester City player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club"?

 

In 1987, would you have said "Can't believe that we are debating whether a Watford player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club"?

 

Honestly...

[dirty_sanchez]

Can't believe that we are debating whether a Burnley player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club.

 

Yup, no good players ever play for rubbish clubs. Ever.

 

Apart from a good half of Liverpool's greatest ever players.

 

And Nick Barmby.

Edited March 30, 2010 by dirty_sanchez
Ah, SD beat me to it.

[Hermes]

Regardless of the merits or otherwise of Chris Eagles, what a ridiculous statement!

 

In 1971 would you have said "Can't believe that we are debating whether a Scunthorpe player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club"?

 

In 1980, would you have said "Can't believe that we are debating whether a Chester City player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club"?

 

In 1987, would you have said "Can't believe that we are debating whether a Watford player may be good enough for Liverpool Football Club"?

 

Honestly...

 

Keegan, Rush and John Barnes were not in their mid-20's when we signed them.

[dirty_sanchez]

Keegan, Rush and John Barnes were not in their mid-20's when we signed them.

 

That's not the point that SD was making though. The person he was responding to was sneering at the idea that we would buy a player from Burnley. Age wasn't even mentioned.