Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?

[Strontium]

1 hour ago, Neil G said:

Just to confirm, then, criticising the Jewish Chronicle for consistently producing verifiably inaccurate and misleading journalism constitutes an attack on the Jewish community and is therefore antisemitic.

 

Is that right? Just so we’re clear what the parameters of the debate are here.

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

 

[Bruce Spanner]

Drink, stupidity and an echo chamber are a hellovadrug.

[Numero Veinticinco]

6 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

You’re English and you’re not being forced out of anywhere. Israel is one of the most powerful nations in the world. It isn’t going anywhere. Hope this helps. 

[sir roger]

12 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

You’re English and you’re not being forced out of anywhere. Israel is one of the most powerful nations in the world. It isn’t going anywhere. Hope this helps. 

You'll be telling me next that Margaret Hodge hasn't really had a suitcase made up in the hall for the last 40 years.

[Gnasher]

23 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

You been snorting angel dust?

[Bjornebye]

39 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

“We’ve” you’ve never even been to Israel you soft twat. You know full well picking up on an article BY the Jewish Chronicle apologising for THEIR lies isn’t anti-Semitic you’re just being your usual gobshite slanderous snide self. 

[Gnasher]

Someone mention the Jewish Chronicle?

 

Here's their editor Steven Pollard getting extremely upset over a far right Jew hater being invited by Boris Johnson to Downing St. 

 

 

 

[Bjornebye]

“Unintentional inaccuracy” is peak strontz there. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

10 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

I think you'll find you've made a few occasional, unintentional inaccuracies in that post, you wetwipe.

[sir roger]

35 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Someone mention the Jewish Chronicle?

 

Here's their editor Steven Pollard getting extremely upset over a far right Jew hater being invited by Boris Johnson to Downing St. 

 

 

 

I imagine you would get more sense , and better spelling , from Su Pollard.

[Numero Veinticinco]

8 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

“Unintentional inaccuracy” is peak strontz there. 

Yeah, it’s almost unbelievable. They’ve been hammered by the press complaints commission and successfully sued for libel a number of times. All unintentional, of course. I mean, it has the word Jewish in the title so therefore can’t be criticised without it being solely because you hate Jews and not because you don’t like liars. This ‘quick, look over here’ routine is becoming fucking tiresome. 
 

If all it takes to be an antisemite is to criticise libel and dishonesty, then what’s so bad about antisemitism? Surely we are all proud antisemites, if that’s what it means. Of course, that’s not what it means and I wish people with a political agenda would stop throwing it around to score cheap points. 

[Bjornebye]

4 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Yeah, it’s almost unbelievable. They’ve been hammered by the press complaints commission and successfully sued for libel a number of times. All unintentional, of course. I mean, it has the word Jewish in the title so therefore can’t be criticised without it being solely because you hate Jews and not because you don’t like liars. This ‘quick, look over here’ routine is becoming fucking tiresome. 

Liars gonna lie mate. Imagine if one of us pulled up many of his posts that in his warped sense of reality could easily pass as racist and labelled him one? Oh wow. We know the truth though mate, unfortunately he isn’t as smart as he thinks he is. Mind you, neither are Einstein or Hawkins 

[sir roger]

Wikipedia suggests that during Pollard's tenure as editor ( just up to 2020 ) they have been the subject of 14 negative findings by the press complaints commission , and the Spectator had to pay significant damages as a result of one of his lying articles in his previous gig.

[Neil G]

21 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Wikipedia suggests that during Pollard's tenure as editor ( just up to 2020 ) they have been the subject of 14 negative findings by the press complaints commission , and the Spectator had to pay significant damages as a result of one of his lying articles in his previous gig.

Those unintentional inaccuracies just keep on coming. Talk about bad luck!

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

It's just unfortunate that they're always unintentionally inaccurate about left leaning or Pro-Palestinian individuals or groups too. 

 

Move along you vile jew haters, stop picking on the poor, unfortunate True(ish) Chronicle! 

[Jairzinho]

11 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

Top bants.

[Bjornebye]

7 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

It's just unfortunate that they're always unintentionally inaccurate about left leaning or Pro-Palestinian individuals or groups too. 

 

Move along you vile jew haters, stop picking on the poor, unfortunate True(ish) Chronicle! 

Yeah the unintentional inaccuracies always conveniently land on the wrong side of slander eh? “I’ve been called a child killer” “have you?” “Well no but how dare you correct my blatant lie you vile anti-Semite” 

 

 

Anyway , Corbs is ace. A man who has campaigned for human rights all his career is a good man in my book. 

[Jairzinho]

1 hour ago, Gnasher said:

Someone mention the Jewish Chronicle?

 

Here's their editor Steven Pollard getting extremely upset over a far right Jew hater being invited by Boris Johnson to Downing St. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Gnasher]

1 minute ago, Jairzinho said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Matt Lucas after a night down the Kets.

[Jairzinho]

Hard drive that stinks of Werthers Originals.

[SasaS]

At least Jeremy got his facts about "former president" Orban right.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 hour ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Yeah, it’s almost unbelievable. They’ve been hammered by the press complaints commission and successfully sued for libel a number of times. All unintentional, of course. I mean, it has the word Jewish in the title so therefore can’t be criticised without it being solely because you hate Jews and not because you don’t like liars. This ‘quick, look over here’ routine is becoming fucking tiresome. 
 

If all it takes to be an antisemite is to criticise libel and dishonesty, then what’s so bad about antisemitism? Surely we are all proud antisemites, if that’s what it means. Of course, that’s not what it means and I wish people with a political agenda would stop throwing it around to score cheap points. 

To say "a newspaper editor is a dickhead and a liar" is clearly not anti-Semitic. 

[Numero Veinticinco]

36 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

To say "a newspaper editor is a dickhead and a liar" is clearly not anti-Semitic. 

Yes. 

[Red Phoenix]

3 hours ago, Gnasher said:

Matt Lucas after a night down the Kets.

It's definitely him.