The McCanns...

[Rico1304]

39 minutes ago, VladimirIlyich said:

If the Portuguese Police have discounted this suspect several times is there a good chance he didn't do it,or they don't have the required evidence? Why would a suspect be discounted 'several' times? Seems a strange one.

Big edit here: I misread the post.    
 

I mean, Peter Sucliffe was discounted by the police a few times.  
 

[Rico1304]

For some reason the Portuguese police didn’t fancy him for it.  He’s a nonce, has continued to be a nonce since she went missing and has numerous other offences too. They’ve got him for drugs offences and raping a 78 yr old woman since then.  He recorded the rape of the old woman. 
 

The Portuguese police were shit, their chief investigators were hopeless and tried to capitalise on the case. 
 

The German police have what they see to be incontrovertible evidence she’s dead, obtained from the nonce who lived in the immediate area at the time .  It’s likely it’s pictures. 
 

Either:

 

1) Parents are involved and have organised the biggest conspiracy ever involving 3 countries, 3 police forces and none of the hundreds of the people complicit have ever decided to speak out

 

2) She was kidnapped and killed by a

nonce. 
 

 

[Rico1304]

6 minutes ago, Istvan Kuntstain said:

 

I take it they didn't show the photo etc to the portuguese? 

 

 

 

The Portuguese discounted him twice, the Germans aren’t using this evidence to keep him in prison. He’s in prison for drugs offences then rape.  
 

What’s your explanation? Is it a massive conspiracy theory thats now managed to rope in the German police. 

[Rico1304]

23 minutes ago, Istvan Kuntstain said:

No I just think he if they have evidence charge him or shut up and wait until you have the evidence to do so otherwise it's just pointless noise. 

They are trying to get the evidence, they didn’t release his name, don’t you think it’s important that they share what they know with our police and ultimately the public? 

[Rico1304]

11 minutes ago, Istvan Kuntstain said:

No, I think it's important if he is guilty that they convict him.

So if they couldn’t get the evidence, but had the picture, they do nothing?  That makes no sense. 

[Rico1304]

24 minutes ago, Istvan Kuntstain said:

can they charge him? the Portuguese seem to indicate they haven't seen a picture of her? what sense does it make to blab to the press? 

The Portuguese have a vested interest in this not being the bloke as they discounted him twice.  Theyve also been pretty shit all the way through this.  
 

The Germans have no skin in the game whatsoever. They are just stating the fact they have evidence they believe proves she is dead. Not releasing that information would be fucking horrific, whether or not they ever convict the guy.   They are hoping to gather evidence to charge him but have said that might never happen. Without corroborating evidence all they have is their ‘proof’ she’s dead.  
 

Say it is a photo (and it may not be) he can easily say he bought it/nicked it or whatever.  
 

If it was him the dogs seem to have been a red herring.  

[No2]

49 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

The Portuguese have a vested interest in this not being the bloke as they discounted him twice.  Theyve also been pretty shit all the way through this.  
 

The Germans have no skin in the game whatsoever. They are just stating the fact they have evidence they believe proves she is dead. Not releasing that information would be fucking horrific, whether or not they ever convict the guy.   They are hoping to gather evidence to charge him but have said that might never happen. Without corroborating evidence all they have is their ‘proof’ she’s dead.  
 

Say it is a photo (and it may not be) he can easily say he bought it/nicked it or whatever.  
 

If it was him the dogs seem to have been a red herring.  

Thats a bit conspiracy theory Rico. 

[Rico1304]

1 minute ago, No2 said:

Thats a bit conspiracy theory Rico. 

It’s a bit factual.  

[No2]

6 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

It’s a bit factual.  

Its also factual to state they have a vested interest in a conviction and closing of this case.

[Rico1304]

2 minutes ago, No2 said:

Its also factual to state they have a vested interest in a conviction and closing of this case.

I’m not disputing that. But it would be embarrassing for them if a man they discounted was found to be responsible. 

[Rick Sanchez C-137]

9 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I’m not disputing that. But it would be embarrassing for them if a man they discounted was found to be responsible. 

 

With new evidence it would be completely normal to go back to a previous suspect

[Rico1304]

10 minutes ago, Aw Geez said:

 

With new evidence it would be completely normal to go back to a previous suspect

He was never a suspect.  That’s the entire point.  The Germans told them he was worth looking at given his history and offending but the Portuguese decided he wasn’t.   

[No2]

13 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I’m not disputing that. But it would be embarrassing for them if a man they discounted was found to be responsible. 

Could it be anymore embarrassing than not solving it at all or taking 14 years or arresting the wrong people or releasing the wrong people, all of it is embarrassing. Quite frankly the police involved locally and even their bosses right up the chain may prefer it not to be the German nonce but Portuguese government want this closed one way or the other. A killer still at loose isn't a good look for a holiday destination. 

[Rick Sanchez C-137]

10 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

He was never a suspect.  That’s the entire point.  The Germans told them he was worth looking at given his history and offending but the Portuguese decided he wasn’t.   

 

So the Portuguese passed on him years ago, and now the Germans are saying they have new/additional evidence? Is that accurate?

[Spy Bee]

Doesn't look like it was the Portuguese who ignored it - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/06/madeleine-mccann-german-police-ignored-warnings-over-suspect-christian-bruckner

[Pureblood]

On 09/12/2020 at 11:52, Rico1304 said:

They have evidence that she’s dead.   The article PB (RIP) posted seemed to suggest it was a picture of her dead.  Him having a picture of her dead wouldn’t be enough to charge him with murder.  They are seeking more evidence and if they get it they will charge.  
 

EDIT: he has form for filming his attacks. He filmed himself raping the old lady in Portugal. 
 

 

Any update on this?

[Pureblood]

Doesn't look like there's an update. Well knock me down with a feather. 

[Rico1304]

32 minutes ago, TK421 said:

Doesn't look like there's an update. Well knock me down with a feather. 

So glad you’re back.

 

Have any of the German laws changed since you last flounced?  

[Pureblood]

When is Christian B getting charged with the murder of Madeleine McCann, rico?

 

You sounded pretty certain, so I thought you'd be the guy to ask. C'mon man, he had a photo and everything and he was known for filming his attacks.

 

Hahahahaha, you gullible cunt. 

[General Dryness]

[Rico1304]

3 minutes ago, TK421 said:

When is Christian B getting charged with the murder of Madeleine McCann, rico?

 

You sounded pretty certain, so I thought you'd be the guy to ask. C'mon man, he had a photo and everything and he was known for filming his attacks.

 

Hahahahaha, you gullible cunt. 

I’m afraid I’m not in charge of the German investigation, I know that is hard for you to grasp but it’s the truth.  Maybe wanking off cadaver dogs has finally got to you. 
 

Fancy coming back from a third or fourth flounce to gleefully talk about a dead kid and actually wanting her parents to have killed her. It’s mental, even for this place.  

[Pureblood]

Just give me the updates, mate.

[Rico1304]

3 minutes ago, TK421 said:

Just give me the updates, mate.

You can use google can’t you? You can see the statement from the German police?  Have you had a drink or something?   

[Pureblood]

Updates or GTFO

[Rico1304]

Just now, TK421 said:

Updates or GTFO

Just have a hate wank over pics of her mum.