New Girl on Countdown

[Guest]

17 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Should send her an invite to this place, could be a nice little earner.

You post here too.

[Guest]

7 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Didn't realise so many here had law degrees from Twitter University. You learn something new every day.

Where did you get yours? The toilet store?

[Creator Supreme]

18 minutes ago, Shooter in the Motor said:

Where did you get yours? The toilet store?

More likely a Christmas cracker!

[AngryOfTuebrook]

8 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Didn't realise so many here were able to read what a judge said. You learn something new every day.

Fixed it.

[Jack the Sipper]

On the one hand, a left-winger has just trounced a far-right, son of a Nazi, would-be dictator in the Chilean election. On the other hand, a notorious Twitter troll has won a defamation case and, in doing so, struck a blow for censorship in the High Court.

 

Yesterday was a swings and roundabouts kind of day for Strontium Dog, the massive Lib Demmer.

[Rico1304]

3 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

On the one hand, a left-winger has just trounced a far-right, son of a Nazi, would-be dictator in the Chilean election. On the other hand, a notorious Twitter troll has won a defamation case and, in doing so, struck a blow for censorship in the High Court.

 

Yesterday was a swings and roundabouts kind of day for Strontium Dog, the massive Lib Demmer.

Censorship? How so?  And is the poor defamed lady from pretty rich sock, she could sell the family Picasso.  

[Jack the Sipper]

25 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Censorship? How so?  And is the poor defamed lady from pretty rich sock, she could sell the family Picasso.  

 

The ruling that the defendant's reply to Riley's comments about Corbyn amounted to defamation? This shitty ruling effectively amounts to a ruling that anyone (not just rich people) who calls Riley 'dangerous and stupid' are harming her reputation and should be censored from doing so. Mind you, it appears we can carry on calling people Nazis, so there's some relief for the free speech martyrs.

 

And it cheapens you to suggest that a person's wealth should be a factor in any judgement handed down in a case like this.

[Rico1304]

30 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

The ruling that the defendant's reply to Riley's comments about Corbyn amounted to defamation? This shitty ruling effectively amounts to a ruling that anyone (not just rich people) who calls Riley 'dangerous and stupid' are harming her reputation and should be censored from doing so. Mind you, it appears we can carry on calling people Nazis, so there's some relief for the free speech martyrs.

 

And it cheapens you to suggest that a person's wealth should be a factor in any judgement handed down in a case like this.

That’s not what happened.  Did you read the whole judgment?  
 

Im just pointing out that she’s very much ‘establisment’ traditionally the very people those on the left demonise.  

[AngryOfTuebrook]

18 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

That’s not what happened.  Did you read the whole judgment?  
 

Im just pointing out that she’s very much ‘establisment’ traditionally the very people those on the left demonise.  

Whether or not someone is one of "the very people those on the left demonise" is irrelevant. If Priti Patel were to receive a load of sexist or racist abuse, it would be "those on the left" defending her from that (while simultaneously criticising her for the horrible shit that she does).

[Rico1304]

9 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Whether or not someone is one of "the very people those on the left demonise" is irrelevant. If Priti Patel were to receive a load of sexist or racist abuse, it would be "those on the left" defending her from that (while simultaneously criticising her for the horrible shit that she does).

Then where are they when Riley receives racist abuse? Is there are difference between Patel and Riley? Can’t think what it is. 

[Lario]

Less politics, more pointy nips.

 

[Bjornebye]

27 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Then where are they when Riley receives racist abuse? Is there are difference between Patel and Riley? Can’t think what it is. 

Bollocks mate, she quite clearly implied that Corbyn was a nazi. She's also labelled him anti-semitic and said he is a racist endeavour on a t-shirt she went to the trouble of having printed. The reply to her calling her stupid and dangerous was correct, she is both of them things. Typical spoilt arse who likes to spout her shit but can't handle when anyone stands up to her and calls her a name back. 

 

 

[Creator Supreme]

She's also a cunt!

[AngryOfTuebrook]

52 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Then where are they when Riley receives racist abuse? Is there are difference between Patel and Riley? Can’t think what it is. 

Hahaha.

 

If Riley - or any Jewish person - ever receives anti-Semitic abuse, people on the left are the first to stomp on it. The difference is that dickheads like you choose to pretend it doesn't happen.

[Rico1304]

39 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Bollocks mate, she quite clearly implied that Corbyn was a nazi. She's also labelled him anti-semitic and said he is a racist endeavour on a t-shirt she went to the trouble of having printed. The reply to her calling her stupid and dangerous was correct, she is both of them things. Typical spoilt arse who likes to spout her shit but can't handle when anyone stands up to her and calls her a name back. 

 

 

If all that happened then why hasn’t Corbyn ever sued?  Seems like a slam dunk.  Unless…

[Rico1304]

16 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Hahaha.

 

If Riley - or any Jewish person - ever receives anti-Semitic abuse, people on the left are the first to stomp on it. The difference is that dickheads like you choose to pretend it doesn't happen.

Ha ha ha yes, I mean they’ve done a Sterling job of standing up to anti-semitism in recent years. Fucking hell. Proper made me laugh that.  Thanks.  

[Bjornebye]

9 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

If all that happened then why hasn’t Corbyn ever sued?  Seems like a slam dunk.  Unless…

But all that did happen 

[Rico1304]

3 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

But all that did happen 

Not according to a judge. But what does he know. 

[VladimirIlyich]

13 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

If all that happened then why hasn’t Corbyn ever sued?  Seems like a slam dunk.  Unless…

I think Corbyn probably wealthier than a good few of us here but not so wealthy as to risk losing a massive chunk of that on a 'he said' 'she said' court case. Generally only lawyers win those.

[Bjornebye]

3 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Not according to a judge. But what does he know. 

She implied he was a nazi. It's blatant. The judge didn't rule against that. 

 

And here is the t-shirt in-case you missed it

 

 

[skend04]

Corbyn should sue her just so we can put to bed this debate over whether or not she's a dickhead.

[VERBAL DIARRHEA]

Wonder she never defended herself wearing an earpiece to her solicitor.

The number is……….10.000

[Rico1304]

32 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

She implied he was a nazi. It's blatant. The judge didn't rule against that. 

 

And here is the t-shirt in-case you missed it

 

 

And yet, right there is the T-shirt and no where is the word nazi.  

[Bjornebye]

Just now, Rico1304 said:

And yet, right there is the T-shirt and no where is the word nazi.  

I didn't say she called him a nazi on her t-shirt? 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

Ha ha ha yes, I mean they’ve done a Sterling job of standing up to anti-semitism in recent years. Fucking hell. Proper made me laugh that.  Thanks.  

You're such a weirdo. Once you fix an idea in your head no amount of evidence is ever going to shake it.