Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The McCanns...


Chris
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TK421 said:

Regardless, a parent with no guilty knowledge would want to know more about the evidence from the dogs rather than shrugging it off.  

 

What's the evidence? That there's some DNA in the room?

 

Sound, I know that. Now, where the fucks my daughter fucked off to?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spring said:

 

The DNA report was originally written in English and then translated into Portuguese for the authorities. Only the summary of the report was submitted to the police in Portuguese, a section which did not include the conditions and limitations regarding validity of the results. There was no evidence to confirm whether the source of the DNA was in fact blood. Second, it was not confirmed that the source was Madeleine.

To be honest, the blood dog doesn’t even come into it for me. The cadaver dog is the one. Behind the sofa, wardrobe, flower bed outside the window. Then her clothes, the cat teddy (which had been washed!? Who washes a missing kids teddy when it’s one of the things with her scent on!) the hire car. Along with all the other inconsistencies in the interviews, it definitely warrants further attention.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anny Road said:

You suggested and posted a picture that they were conspiring together. You then state she was not able to confirm anything either of the parents said. Which is it? You can’t hve it both ways.

I can have it both ways, they're not mutually exclusive.  Kate & Gerry's statements differ wildly, for example.  Are you suggesting that a married couple are not in cahoots?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Plev said:

To be honest, the blood dog doesn’t even come into it for me. The cadaver dog is the one. Behind the sofa, wardrobe, flower bed outside the window. Then her clothes, the cat teddy (which had been washed!? Who washes a missing kids teddy when it’s one of the things with her scent on!) the hire car. Along with all the other inconsistencies in the interviews, it definitely warrants further attention.

 

Maybe they should get rid of court rooms/the justice system all together and just have Netflix decide who's guilty?

 

It's more fun when justice is presented in a series!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Spring said:

 

What's the evidence? That there's some DNA in the room?

 

Sound, I know that. Now, where the fucks my daughter fucked off to?

They didn't know that, because Gerry McCann was unable to produce a DNA sample without flying back to Leicestershire to obtain it.  That would have been the first time they were made aware of a possible DNA match at the scene, but they dismissed it out of hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TK421 said:

It would be easy for them to forge the creche records.  The fact that Kate's signature appears on the records when she says in her book that she pre-arranged for Gerry to collect them on 3rd May, for me that gives rise to a presumption that the records have been forged. 

 

The McCanns are on very friendly terms with Catriona Baker.  Here's a photo of them all larging it up in England.

 

25nov273.jpg  

 

22 minutes ago, TK421 said:

So would I, I agree.  The problem is that Baker can't say anything with a degree of certainty ("I don't know", "I can't remember").  And what she does say conflicts with Gerry and Kate's accounts of what happened. 

Those two posts suggest opposites. 1 she is part of the conspiracy as close pal. 2. She confirms non of the parents testimony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TK421 said:

They didn't know that, because Gerry McCann was unable to produce a DNA sample without flying back to Leicestershire to obtain it.  That would have been the first time they were made aware of a possible DNA match at the scene, but they dismissed it out of hand. 

 

If we're being honest here, I don't think any of us know how we'd react to this situation.

 

Personally, I'd like to think I'd be out in the streets getting rid of the body hunting her down but in reality, I'd be back at the tapas bar finishing off my all-inclusive Sangria. Maddie's a rogue, she'll be back when she realises there's a Pizza Hut-esque ice cream factory.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anny Road said:

 

Those two posts suggest opposites. 1 she is part of the conspiracy as close pal. 2. She confirms non of the parents testimony.

They're not mutually exclusive.  And you've misinterpreted part 2.  She does confirm parts of the parents' testimony, but gets the details wrong.  Also, Kate and Gerry's accounts of what happened don't match with each other, so whatever she says will conflict with one of them.  It's impossible for her to agree with both of them, because they don't agree with each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry Wom said:

I've said it loads of times before. If this was a low income family from a council estate on holiday in benidorm, they'd have lost their other 2 kids too as soon as they got home. It's hard to know if the McCann's literally got off with murder, but they have certainly got away with child negligence because they're a couple of middle class doctors. 

 

This would be presented completely differently too.

 

They'd find past pictures of them drunk off their face and try and blend it into the story. In fact, it would be a non-story until hints that they'd murdered her came out and then it would be 'alcoholic mum shows no remorse for dead daughter'.

 

Classic class factor, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Spring said:

 

If we're being honest here, I don't think any of us know how we'd react to this situation.

 

Personally, I'd like to think I'd be out in the streets getting rid of the body hunting her down but in reality, I'd be back at the tapas bar finishing off my all-inclusive Sangria. Maddie's a rogue, she'll be back when she realises there's a Pizza Hut-esque ice cream factory.

I can take an educated guess.  If my pet cat went missing and the police told me they had a possible DNA match, I'd want to know more.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TK421 said:

The UK government definitely has more knowledge than they let on.  

 

Insert tin foil hat picture here. 

Friday 7th May 2010

 

“Dave here’s the keys mate, there’s no money left but hey, shit happens.......oh I forgot, the McCanns, turns out they were involved in the disappearance of their kid after all, hoestly what a caper, do us a favour keep it on the down low would you”

 

“Cheers Gord, will do lid”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Plev said:

There’s two dogs in the video. First is the cadaver dog, second one is the blood dog.

Yeah exactly my point, the cadaver dog doesn't smell a scent inside the car. The video shows that.

 

Also, it departs the outside of the car a few times and is called back repeatedly to it about 4/5 times!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Juniper said:

Yeah exactly my point, the cavader dog doesn't smell a scent inside the car. The video shows that.

 

Also, it departs the outside of the car a few times and is called back repeatedly to it about 4/5 times!!

The cadaver dog picked up the scent through the drivers door seal, which is why it barked. In the video when it passes the car it runs around with its head in the air because it’s picked up a scent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Plev said:

The cadaver dog picked up the scent through the drivers door seal, which is why it barked. In the video when it passes the car it runs around with its head in the air because it’s picked up a scent. 

 

Yeah again, it didn't pick up a scent inside the car.

 

The dog can't be inside the car when it's outside of it. Not sure what you're disagreeing with.

 

It was reported it picked up a scent from inside the boot, it didn't. 

 

"Until he's 29, he's 28"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...