Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Which team is "bigger"?


RedinSweden
 Share

Which is the bigger team?  

82 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is the bigger team?



Recommended Posts

I agree with what you are saying. It was a fledgling competition back then and it did not have nearly the prestige or pedigree as later years. It's their good fortune that it wasn't so heavily contested, but by all accounts they still had a marvellous team (Di Stefano and the like I think).

 

Surely Hermes was at the finals in question and can shed some light on teams and line-ups?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest TK-421

It was invite only and Real Madrid dished out the invitations, it stinks, unless that's a myth. They're still "bigger" than us though although that Robinho is a tiny little guy. I'll get me replica training coat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they have won 29 titles.

 

 

A lot of Real's success was in the fifties (especially the Euro cups). Looking at it, it seems they were the 'Chelski' of the day, against teams equivalent to Accrington Stanley!, and that blemishes their success IMO. :thumbdown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're the biggest club in the world: most successful club from the birthplace of football. Madrid's first five (?) consecutive wins were Mickey Mouse as no-one entered the European Cup. Therefore we're bigger than them. Anyone who disagrees is weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it is just on titles - 18 -5 implies the domestic trophies are more important, so what about Ajax 25-4 ? Juve 26 -2, Benfica 34 -2, or if its the european titles which take priority AC Milan are 14-6...........can't have it both ways

 

'big club' should be judged on attendance, capacity, wealth, reputation, fan base as well as 'success' imo and it should all be weighted to the last decade or so.

 

To my mind there are about 11 'big clubs' : Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, United, Milan, Inter, Celtic, Juve, Benfica, Ajax and Us

 

- Chelsea and Arsenal are missing a euro trophy, Dortmund, Roma and Porto etc also just fall short for different reasons..........Valencia, Hamburg, Newcastle, Rangers, Marseille, Sevilla, Lyon, PSV would all have to battle it out amongst themselves to get into the top 20

 

whichever way you cut it Madrid are bigger the fact they are state sponsored and a number of their titles are dubious to say the least doesn't alter that unfortunately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the lure of the club? Madrid can just about lure any player they want to the club, even players who are figureheads at their own club. Could we do that? e.g. could we have taken Figo from Barca? Or Zidane from Juventus?

 

We took Nunez from Real Madrid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're taking the piss? They're not even the biggest club in Glasgow.

 

Rangers have more domestic titles (40 to Celtics 25) but they dont have a european cup do they and most of their domestic titles were pre-war - you trying to shoot yeself down in flames or what? their stadiums smaller, their average attendance is 10,000 less, their skint............try and keep up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the lure of the club? Madrid can just about lure any player they want to the club, even players who are figureheads at their own club. Could we do that? e.g. could we have taken Figo from Barca? Or Zidane from Juventus?

 

For that money: yes. It's amazing how great your team can be if being in the red doesn't concern you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ulysses Everett McGill
For that money: yes. It's amazing how great your team can be if being in the red doesn't concern you.

 

Spot on

 

Look at Chelsea

 

More pertinent, look as Lucas Niell

 

If some billionaire went out and took over Reading, and give them a bottless pit of cash, they also could sign anyone they wanted, doesnt make them a big club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying Real aren't big, or bigger, as I think there's not a lot in it but I do think you have to look at the fact that 5 of their European Cups were earnt when the trophy was in it's infancy and not everyone was in it and the most recent ones were done whilst goin £200m into the red, which without the council bailing them out would leave them in deep, deep, liquidisation-looming shite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else think that there's something a bit funny about winning the first five years of the tournament? It's kind of like Uruguay winning the World Cup when we weren't even in it but would have pissed it, I can't respect it as much.

 

well, the fact is they won it. Plus you can only beat whats in front of you.

Like manc cunts say we have not won a premier league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...