Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The McCanns...


Chris
 Share

Recommended Posts

The whole "checking routine" was most likely fabricated as part of the cover-up.  Who organises a system of checks every 15 minutes when they are dining out?  Nobody, that's who.  It would completely kill the ambience of the evening.  It is also documented that the resort offered a free baby-sitting/watching service for parents, to enable them to go out in the evenings without worrying about their children.

 

There is evidence to suggest that Madeleine died four days earlier on the Sunday.  This is because there are no known images of her alive after that day.  The so-called "last photo" of her taken by the swimming pool could not have possibly been taken after Sunday 31st May, because the weather on the following days was overcast, whereas on Sunday 31st May the weather was bright and sunny as appears in the photo.  It is a virtual certainty that the last photo was taken on Sunday 31st May given the weather on the following days.  

 

There are no other photos of Madeleine after Sunday 31st May, except for the ludicrous "tennis ball" photo which doesn't even look like Madeleine.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How old are you 11.

I’ve taken dumps which could formulate more coherent and valid arguments.

I was about 19 years ago. I didn’t say I wanted an argument or I didn’t say that I’m an expert. My opinions is that they shouldn’t have left their children alone, whether they went and checked on them or not and that they know what happened to that little girl. I don’t give a shit about what you think or what you think you know, that’s just what I think happened.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was about 19 years ago. I didn’t say I wanted an argument or I didn’t say that I’m an expert. My opinions is that they shouldn’t have left their children alone, whether they went and checked on them or not and that they know what happened to that little girl. I don’t give a shit about what you think or what you think you know, that’s just what I think happened.

If you don’t like arguments you shouldn’t say unsubstantiated shite without anything whatsoever to back it up.

Talk shit you will get challenged.

 

I’ll just leave this line here which you should read again several times.

 

I haven’t got evidence nor can I be bothered to find any of the shit I’ve read and seen over the past 10 years but I think they accidentally did it and have covered it up since,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. Yeah. OK.

 

Just being serious for a minute, what evidence do you have that Madeleine was abducted and killed?  

 

I respect your view but I don't think you've looked into this case much.  That's the impression I get from reading your post.

 

I think if you looked into it properly then given your background/profession, you would realise that the abduction theory is extremely unlikely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just being serious for a minute, what evidence do you have that Madeleine was abducted and killed?  

Just being serious for a minute, friendship aside, which it is, on the subject, what evidence, despite intensive investigations into the case and Millions of pounds spent and the fact that nearly 11 years later. no charges have been brought, what evidence do you have that she wasn't?

Apart from a bungled Portuguese investigation and someone who wanted to sell a book?

You, YOU are the one making the claims that the McCann's are being shielded by the Police and the Government.

Anything you want to get lippy about, outside this topic, you know where to find me.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just being serious for a minute, friendship aside, which it is, on the subject, what evidence, despite intensive investigations into the case and Millions of pounds spent and the fact that nearly 11 years later. no charges have been brought, what evidence do you have that she wasn't?

Apart from a bungled Portuguese investigation and someone who wanted to sell a book?

You, YOU are the one making the claims that the McCann's are being shielded by the Police and the Government.

Anything you want to get lippy about, outside this topic, you know where to find me.

 

 

The evidence that she wasn't abducted is manifold and if I were to list it all I would literally be here all night.

 

If there is one single bit of evidence that convinces me there wasn't an abduction, it is the McCanns changing their witness statement about the shutters being jemmied/forced open.  They later said that the so-called abductor entered through the apartment front doors, which were unlocked.  

 

I also think it's unlikely that the abductor wouldn't have been spotted following the largest scale investigation for a missing person in Portuguese history.

 

Finally, a corpse has not been found.  

 

I'm not being "lippy", I'm posting about this because I find it generally interesting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The evidence that she wasn't abducted is manifest and if I were to list it all I would literally be here all night.

 

If there is one single bit of evidence that convinces me there wasn't an abduction, it is the McCanns changing their witness statement about the shutters being jemmied/forced open.  They later said that the so-called abductor entered through the apartment front doors, which were unlocked.  

 

I also think it's unlikely that the abductor wouldn't have been spotted following the largest scale investigation for a missing person in Portuguese history.

 

Finally, a corpse has not been found.  

 

I'm not being "lippy", I'm posting about this because I find it generally interesting.  

Do you really, really think that Parents who had murdered their own child wouldn't change their behaviour over a period of what 36-48 hours? Do you really think that they would sit down with a group of friends and say "Look, shit this, BUT, look Maddy was being a bit of pain and we smacked her and she died, so now, keep schtum like, let's pretend like there's nothing wrong. Let's keep going out to Dinner, say nowt and all will be Ok?" These aren't Mafia people, these are people on Holiday. People who aren't knowing of criminality and how to fuck the system.

Do you really, really think that the whole weight of the British Police would be fully behind them and effectively say, many, many times "we are looking for other people, NOT the parents?"

Of course not.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you really, really think that Parents who had murdered their own child wouldn't change their behaviour over a period of what 36-48 hours? Do you really think that they would sit down with a group of friends and say "Look, shit this, BUT, look Maddy was being a bit of pain and we smacked her and she died, so now, keep schtum like, let's pretend like there's nothing wrong. Let's keep going out to Dinner, say nowt and all will be Ok?" These aren't Mafia people, these are people on Holiday. People who aren't knowing of criminality and how to fuck the system.

Do you really, really think that the whole weight of the British Police would be fully behind them and effectively say, many, many times "we are looking for other people, NOT the parents?"

Of course not.

 

 

I don't think they murdered her - I think she died in their care.

 

I think that if she was abducted, their witness statements would be accurate, consistent and would tally both with themselves and each other's over time, but this is not the case.  Their recollection of events that night changes over the course of the several witness statements they made and information given in other on the record interviews (with the media etc.), it changes over time and the statements have inconsistencies when compared against each other and the rest of the tapas seven.  

 

It is not surprising that they were made arguidos given the high number of inconsistencies in their statements.  Against this backdrop you then have Kate refusing to answer 48 questions when being interviewed under caution.  

 

Now that I've answered your question about why I don't think there was an abduction, why do you think there was one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems strange that the 'abductor' took Madeline, when her two younger twin brothers were in the same room? You'd get more for your money with a boy on the child exploitation market, from what I've been told?

Odd that Interpol turned up before the local police arrived?

Who the fuck thinks to ring Max Clifford 30 minutes after she goes missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is one single bit of evidence that convinces me there wasn't an abduction, it is the McCanns changing their witness statement about the shutters being jemmied/forced open.  They later said that the so-called abductor entered through the apartment front doors, which were unlocked.  

 

 

From previous experience it's fucking impossible to open those shutters, even if you're Geoff Capes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never gotten this, leaving the kids on their own is neglect angle. 

Being mid forties I was (un)fortunate enough to spend my early summer holidays with my parents at various Pontins' sites. Every evening the parents would go on the piss (I once saw Bob Monkhouse live and Googie the Liverpool duck) in the on site clubs and leave all their children in the chalets on their own.  A few Blue coats (Pontin staff) would spend the evening walking around the site listening for babies crying. If they heard anything an announcement would be made over the tannoy giving chalet number of baby crying, so drunken parents could go and sort it out. All perfectly normal and acceptable at the time. 

 

Knowing someone who worked in the McCann resort, this was the child checking service they also ran there, but the McCanns chose not to pay for it. The fact the resort ran that service, indicates to me that it was normal practice for the parents to go for a meal whilst their offspring were in bed, with staff walking around the resort. Again, apparently all perfectly normal and acceptable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they murdered her - I think she died in their care.

 

I think that if she was abducted, their witness statements would be accurate, consistent and would tally both with themselves and each other's over time, but this is not the case.  Their recollection of events that night changes over the course of the several witness statements they made and information given in other on the record interviews (with the media etc.), it changes over time and the statements have inconsistencies when compared against each other and the rest of the tapas seven.  

 

It is not surprising that they were made arguidos given the high number of inconsistencies in their statements.  Against this backdrop you then have Kate refusing to answer 48 questions when being interviewed under caution.  

Of course they were made Arguidos. Which parents in any missing/abduction/potential murder/disapearance case aren't made suspects?

As you well know, the last person to see any missing person is always the main suspect.

The rest is circumstance. Since when have eyewitnesses who don't have a reason to commit fact to memory been reliable?

There isn't any evidence at all.

Ah yeah, but the window, I'm sure it was shut, or open, or nearly open, or was that yesterday? Or the day before? Now you come to mention it, I didn't see Madelaine yesterday, she was playing in the pool on Tuesday, or was in Monday, actually, I'm not sure, it could've been earlier.

Until the body is found, which will be nearby, and any proof can be found that they did it, which there isn't, it's all a case of "her eyes are too close together and I don't like the way she wore that white t shirt in that interview."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...