Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.


Woo
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 07/12/2021 at 12:25, Gnasher said:

That Jennifer Acuri's proving to be a right sort, she's now got Brillo all upset,

 

 

 

Gone to the dogs twitter, used to be able to call people nonces with impunity.

She’s going to be facing a big bill. Claimed without any evidence that Andrew Neil was a pardophile and a friend of Epstein. Now she’s probably going to be made bankrupt though she’ll probably just never come back to the UK and I doubt he’ll pursue her in the states. Risky business calling people paedos in a public forum. Much safer on the GF, people don’t sue here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Captain Willard said:

She’s going to be facing a big bill. Claimed without any evidence that Andrew Neil was a pardophile and a friend of Epstein. Now she’s probably going to be made bankrupt though she’ll probably just never come back to the UK and I doubt he’ll pursue her in the states. Risky business calling people paedos in a public forum. Much safer on the GF, people don’t sue here. 

Not sure she will. Neil himself initially retweeted the tweet so spread it to a bigger audience than it would have received, which a court might not look favourably on, and it would really depend if she has assets here. I saw a tweet from an American lawyer saying it's established that the US won't enforce a libel judgement unless the jurisdiction in which the judgment is made has the equivalent of first amendment rights, which we don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anubis said:

Not sure she will. Neil himself initially retweeted the tweet so spread it to a bigger audience than it would have received, which a court might not look favourably on, and it would really depend if she has assets here. I saw a tweet from an American lawyer saying it's established that the US won't enforce a libel judgement unless the jurisdiction in which the judgment is made has the equivalent of first amendment rights, which we don't.

Yes good point. Probably only her assets here that are at risk. Makes you wonder why he’s bothering to spend money on lawyers. I suppose he can’t just let it slide from a reputational point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

If you're unfortunate enough to live in the Stockport area and enjoy McDonald's fast food you're in luck. Barry from Stockport has for some strange reason reviewed them all numerous times on trip advisor, although I don't think he'll be bagging a large restaurant critics job anytime soon,

 

this threads great,

 

 

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...