Terry - Surprise! Chelsea Appeal

[Unrighteous]

Seriously... How the fuck did that rugby tackle get overturned?

[hamstrung]

"Overturned" means not worthy of a card at all?

 

Gettafuck.

[El Rojo]

I'm sure Slur Alex will have a few incomprehensible words to say about this.

 

A draw would be good for us. Failing that a United win, which is even more unlikely now.

[23 Carra Gold]

so much for the RESPECT campaign most corrupt organisation known to man

[spider-neil]

that is a RIDICULOUS decision, basically they are saying the rugby tackle isn't a bookable offence. sorry but that is taking the fucking PISS.

[spider-neil]

I'm sure Slur Alex will have a few incomprehensible words to say about this.

 

A draw would be good for us. Failing that a United win, which is even more unlikely now.

 

I'd rather see manu beaten and out of the title race, if things go tits up for us its possible to catch one team but not two, no way do two teams fuck up enough to let a third in.

[robslappa]

That was never a red card in a million years.

 

Both of Vidic's yellow cards were red cards in my opinion. The first one because there was a goal scoring opportunity denied and the second one because he basically tried to take Xabi's head off with an elbow.

 

But no way should Mongo have been sent off and I hope he gets off with it so he plays on Sunday.

[god knows]

That is ridiculous. Any links?

[Carra_is_legend]

Stunned. Speechless. Absolute fucking joke.

 

So, the tackle is not even worthy of a yellow card? Fuck me.

 

"Respect" campaign. Yeah, right. I can certainly see Fergie and other managers respecting the referees now.

 

FA will always be FA. Toothless cunts.

 

If Ferdinand had got the red card instead of Vidic, I'm sure FA would overturn that too.

[hamstrung]

That was never a red card in a million years.

 

Both of Vidic's yellow cards were red cards in my opinion. The first one because there was a goal scoring opportunity denied and the second one because he basically tried to take Xabi's head off with an elbow.

 

But no way should Mongo have been sent off and I hope he gets off with it so he plays on Sunday.

 

Maybe not, but if I understand it right, this decision is saying it wasn't even a yellow.

[Carra_is_legend]

That was never a red card in a million years.

 

But no way should Mongo have been sent off and I hope he gets off with it so he plays on Sunday.

 

The FA rule* says that a straight red card cannot be turned to a yellow.

 

Terry's tackle is worth a yellow - atleast.

 

The decision today means Terry didn't even get a card for that tackle. Which is a joke.

[gazelle]

so much for the RESPECT campaign most corrupt organisation known to man

 

Exactly - makes a complete farce of the whole thing. I wonder if it had been a West Brom player if it would have been the same outcome.

[Randy Marsh]

Maybe not, but if I understand it right, this decision is saying it wasn't even a yellow.

 

Is correct. Thats why i said in the second post of this thread that it wouldnt get overturned. How can they seriously justify this decision? Its unbelievable! Anyone would think he was the Ingurlund captain or somethin....:whistle:

[Unrighteous]

The FA rule* says that a straight red card cannot be turned to a yellow.

 

Terry's tackle is worth a yellow - atleast.

 

The decision today means Terry didn't even get a card for that tackle. Which is a joke.

 

Absolute fucking piss take.

[god knows]

That was never a red card in a million years.

 

.

 

.

 

I agree to a certain extent that it was a rather harsh red but it was one hundred fucking per cent a foul and a yellow card. This is what the F.A. are saying and it stinks.

[snez1]

It was always going to get overturned. He's England captain and they are playing the mancs in Sky's ultimate showdown this weekend.

 

In fairness it's up for debate as to whether it was worthy of a red and Demento can't argue because Vidic got a yellow for a worse foul on Keane.

[Code]

Hahahahahahahahaha.....

 

Truly pathetic by the FA, but no surprises there, off course it was a red card, no doubt about that!

[robslappa]

The FA rule* says that a straight red card cannot be turned to a yellow.

 

Terry's tackle is worth a yellow - atleast.

 

The decision today means Terry didn't even get a card for that tackle. Which is a joke.

 

I hadn't realised the red card had been overturned when I posted as I hadn't read the whole thread and I wasn't aware either that a red card couldn't be downgraded to a yellow, I thought it could.

 

You're right, it is definite yellow, so in order to correct a mistake the FA have made another one. Fucking useless they are.

[JohnnyH]

It wasn't a red card so I don't know why people are getting so upset. If this was Carra or Skyrtl we'd agree with the decision without question. I fuckin' hate the racist cunt but this is the correct decision.

[Unrighteous]

It wasn't a red card so I don't know why people are getting so upset. If this was Carra or Skyrtl we'd agree with the decision without question. I fuckin' hate the racist cunt but this is the correct decision.

 

It was a red card, and it was ALWAYS a yellow card, which means they cannot overturn it.

 

However, they have... which just screams corruption.

[JohnnyH]

It was a red card, and it was ALWAYS a yellow card, which means they cannot overturn it.

 

However, they have... which just screams corruption.

 

If one of ours was sent off for that I'd be raging.

[Randy Marsh]

It wasn't a red card so I don't know why people are getting so upset. If this was Carra or Skyrtl we'd agree with the decision without question. I fuckin' hate the racist cunt but this is the correct decision.

 

Most people are not complaining that it was a red card offence. The reason people are pissed off is because for this decision to have been made, the FA wouldve had to judge that the incident was not even worthy of a yellow! And i think it is clear for everyone to see that it quite blatantly WAS a yellow. FA rules state that they can not downgrade a red to a yellow, but can cancel a red if deamed not worthy of a booking. This rule proves that decision is absolutely corrupt and farcical.

[Carra_is_legend]

It wasn't a red card so I don't know why people are getting so upset. If this was Carra or Skyrtl we'd agree with the decision without question. I fuckin' hate the racist cunt but this is the correct decision.

 

The actual tackle doesn't warrant a red card but the FA have gone against their own rules here.

 

Chelsea must have appealed that the tackle wasn't worthy of a card and they won. Do you think this is right?

[Unrighteous]

If one of ours was sent off for that I'd be raging.

 

Um... It'd be correct but I'd be angry too. Angry that they were sent off but I'd understand it.

 

Anyway, you are just talking emotion and ignoring the fact that a straight red card cannot be downgraded to a yellow card. So, they are saying it wasn't even a bookable offence!

[god knows]

It makes a right tit of Halsey this decision.