Jump to content
TLW
TLW

Report: Liverpool looking to capitalise on potential Chelsea cleanout

The threat of Financial Fair Play sanctions hanging over Chelsea could see the West London club having to shed a trio of academy graduates off their books with Liverpool lining up to sign them.

 

The Mirror reports that a "fire sale" may be required in the summer at Stamford Bridge for them to comply with FFP regulations after their seemingly endless spending spree under their new owner Todd Boehly.

 

While Chelsea believe that they have everything in check when it comes to their finances, if they fail to qualify for Europe next season then their situation could worsen significantly with UEFA reportedly keeping a close eye on proceedings.

 

Mason Mount is a player that has been widely reported to be a player of significant interest to Jurgen Klopp and the fact that his contract is running down works in the Reds favour.

 

image.png

 

The other two Blues players that have reportedly caught the eye of Liverpool are Conor Gallagher and  Levi Colwill who is a central defender currently on loan at Brighton.

 

Signing the trio will also boost the home-grown qualified contingent at Liverpool which is set to take a hit in the summer with the likely departure of Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, Nat Phillips, Caoimhin Kelleher and James Milner.

 

As with any coveted player that comes onto the market there will be competition with Man United said to be closely looking at signing Mount while Brighton and Man City have interest in Colwill and Newcastle are closely  monitoring Gallagher.

 

image.png

 

This news comes on the back this week where Liverpool officially ended any hopes of Jude Bellingham in the summer.

 

In a dismal season where fans have been looking to cling onto any kind of hope that the Borussia Dortmund and England star would make his way to the club in the summer but that was unceremoniously dashed.

 

Speaking ahead of their Monday night clash with Leeds, the manager produced a impassioned defence of their recruitment strategy which has come under the spotlight in recent times and said that being fixated on one player could see them miss out on other targets.

 

“What you want to know is as I sit here, am I angry that we can’t do this or that. No I am not. I am not, I don’t agree all the time with everything we do…but I am employed here.

 

“I am not here to be angry about things that will work out or not. If I am angry we don’t all of a sudden have more money, or the resources to do everything. So it’s rubbish (to get angry), it’s not ok - I’m too much of a professional.

 

klopp3_600.jpg

 

(Referring to the Bellingham situation ) “ We have to make sure, we have to make decisions for the team, for the club and we cannot dream, we cannot be angry if we don’t get this or we don’t get that. If there’s no chance for it, why should we do that?”

 

“The budget is important and then timing is important, knowing when things can happen is important. Guarantees are important, if we go for it, whether will we get it is important. If you put too much focus on something you only might get, all the rest of the market could be gone.

 

"(Talking about possible targets) is a heated thing, but now we see, there are 12 midfielders we could sign. There are a lot of good players out there, honestly, yeah a lot of good players - and we are interested in all good players, and some of them will end up here.”

 

Across the football landscape, managers have been known to walk away from clubs when unable to land their prime targets, but do not expect Klopp to do anything of the sort saying “This is my club.”

 

And he insists he can get Liverpool back on track in the seasons ahead.

 

"For us playing football to be successful, yes it must be possible, of course it is possible to rebuild in three years. Of course it is better to play much better football than we did this year, it must be possible.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

User Feedback

Recommended Comments



So we've gone from trying to sign one of the best young players in the world to trying to sign players that can't get in the Chelsea team?

 

Neither Mount or Gallagher are the answer.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Megadrive Man said:

So we've gone from trying to sign one of the best young players in the world to trying to sign players that can't get in the Chelsea team?

 

Neither Mount or Gallagher are the answer.

This - don’t ever want to see Mount or Gallagher near a reds shirt - not even on the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JohnnyH said:

I’d happily take Gallagher for the right price. I really liked him at Palace. 

 

He was good there. And nasty with it. We could use that. 

 

But when I've seen him for Chelsea and England, he's looked mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Josef Svejk said:

 

He was good there. And nasty with it. We could use that. 

 

But when I've seen him for Chelsea and England, he's looked mediocre.


Stating the obvious I know, but Chelsea is a shit show.

 

My thinking would be in a settled environment with good coaching in a squad that’s not bigger than the population of a small country, he’d get game time. I think he’d really complement the style of play and squad. He showed all the attributes of being able to progress to a regular 1st team player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

Every fucker should refuse to buy from them and watch the pressure of the giant squad consume them.

 

They're already, reportedly, doing mad shit like looking to extend Enzo Fernandez' 8 year deal (signed 2 and half months ago) so they can bring his yearly cost down so it's probably safe to say it's already consuming them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Megadrive Man said:

So we've gone from trying to sign one of the best young players in the world to trying to sign players that can't get in the Chelsea team?

 

Neither Mount or Gallagher are the answer.


They’re classic Aston Villa signings, which is the level of club we can expect to compete with nowadays and be on level points with if we win our two games in hand.

 

They're not the sort of signings you make if top four is a genuine expectation though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not every player needs to be a BiG NaME. Silly comments were made when signing Gini from Newcastle that it was underwhelming. We need a very good squad with very good players able to come in and play and not cause a significant drop in quality. Gallagher, in my opinion, would be a very good option in that vein, while also having the ability to get better and maybe first choice. 
 

If we just want silver bullets in every position of a squad then that’s never ever going to happen at any club anywhere. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JohnnyH said:

Not every player needs to be a BiG NaME. Silly comments were made when signing Gini from Newcastle that it was underwhelming. We need a very good squad with very good players able to come in and play and not cause a significant drop in quality. Gallagher, in my opinion, would be a very good option in that vein, while also having the ability to get better and maybe first choice. 
 

If we just want silver bullets in every position of a squad then that’s never ever going to happen at any club anywhere. 

 

Gini and Sadio were the star players for their clubs though.

 

Gallagher struggles to hold down a place in a mid table Chelsea team. I agree that he looked impressive at Palace but he hasn't kicked on this season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought every player we bought was supposed to have been studied by anthropologists, psychiatrists and sports scientists from the age of 8 to see if they'd fit into a well oiled machine? Isn't that the excuse that's always wheeled out when we're told there are no midfielders in world football who'd be an improvement on Curtis Jones and James Milner? Now it's a trolly dash to catch someone else's rejects?

 

It's almost like we've been strung along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, an tha said:

That Gallagher has just done one of those goal things - as a midfielder that surely rules him out of being someone we'd sign.


Wouldn’t be like us to sign a ten for a team that doesn’t play with one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheDrowningMan said:


They’re classic Aston Villa signings, which is the level of club we can expect to compete with nowadays and be on level points with if we win our two games in hand.

 

They're not the sort of signings you make if top four is a genuine expectation though.

 

Not saying any are the right player but what big club was in for Gini,Robertson. None of the top 6 took a punt on Mane or Salah in the end either, linked but didn't actually do any deal. Same could be said for Coutinho and Sturridge when we actually signed them. For Coutinho it was us or Southampton.

 

Mount is linked with other top clubs. Gallagher may well not be at the level but we are stuck in a position needing English players in the squad to meet the quota 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shows where we are nowadays when we are pursuing Chelsea rejects. Mount is shite, I don't know a single Chelsea fan (and sadly I know a few) that rates him. Gallacher is a good mid-table type player, not a player a team aspiring to win titles would want. We need to look way higher than players of this caliber. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...