Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Is it just my imagination, or does this Imperialist murderer from a family of slave-owners look familiar? OK, he goes by the name "General Earle", but he's not fooling me. The cunt.

 

 

Fuck sake Jezza. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bjornebye said:

Wow. I thought you were 50s. No offence fella 

Mate, I've just got the personality of an old cunt. I'm not actually an old cunt. I remember when I told Rapey, and he was like 'fuck off, there's no way I'm having it that you're younger than me'. I've got that tattooed on the inside of my eyelids, just so I'm reminded of it every time I blink.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Mate, I've just got the personality of an old cunt. I'm not actually an old cunt. I remember when I told Rapey, and he was like 'fuck off, there's no way I'm having it that you're younger than me'. I've got that tattooed on the inside of my eyelids, just so I'm reminded of it every time I blink.

Hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 minutes ago, Hank Moody said:

It certainly would have been interesting to see if he could have ended foodbanks at the moment and through the pandemic, not to mention the rest of the stuff. 

The pandemic isn't what is causing people to rely on foodbanks, or any of the other stuff.

 

Personally, I doubt Corbyn could have achieved half of that list, because his own Parliamentary Party would have stopped it. Still, we'd certainly be in a much less shit shape than we are now. Even the Brexit cultists might have seen some actual progress, rather than just Johnson's empty slogan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

The pandemic isn't what is causing people to rely on foodbanks, or any of the other stuff.

I'm aware, but that's not what I said. I said it would be interesting to see then fix the issue during the pandemic. That was, of course, a seriously difficult time for a lot of people. The increate in foodbanks from a few under New Labour to roughly a Brazillian since 2010 is disgusting and the underlying caused need looking at, but had he taken over in 2019, to claim there'd be none is, in my view, fanciful. 

 

40 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Personally, I doubt Corbyn could have achieved half of that list, because his own Parliamentary Party would have stopped it. Still, we'd certainly be in a much less shit shape than we are now.

Well, he probably wouldn't have put a fiddler in a position of power, spunked a load of money into his mate's PPE business, and partied until he was sick in a bush in number 10, but I also think there's a bit of a rosy perspective on the utopia it would have been if he'd got in. Not because of the PLP either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, A Red said:

To say there would have been no foodbanks is complete and utter bollocks. Once invented, food banks can never be un-invented. The best that could happen is a reduction in demand.

I think the idea is to reduce demand to the point that they close. That can only be done over time, and probably with a significant change in the balance of the economy. I agree that it seems fanciful. Especially given what’s happened since. 
 

As an aside, one of the most distressing things of late is foodbanks not just being for those who can make ends meet on benefits, as awful and demeaning as that is, but companies starting foodbanks for their own employees. That’s fucking broken. It’s even broken from a conservative perspective, and it’s not indicative of a prosperous economy. Well, not for ordinary people. You can’t dismiss those people as ‘scroungers‘, those are working people, and if working people can’t feed themselves, we are in some trouble.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gnasher said:

He was indeed. Totally ignored.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Gnasher said:

^ Sainsburys profits last year = 600 million.

Meanwhile, Jack Monroe has been calling on her Twitter followers to turn a blind eye if they see someone shoplifting baby food, baby formula or nappies; because that's where we live now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...