Jump to content
tlw content
tlw content

Rodgers slams England over Sturridge treatment

Brendan Rodgers has spoken in greater detail about why he feels Daniel Sturridge’s injury - sustained on international duty with England - could have been avoided.

 

A clearly irritated Rodgers claims that Sturridge was injured on what would usually have been a “rest day” had the striker been with his club rather than his country. Furthermore, not only was Sturridge training on that day (Friday), he was playing a full intensity 11 a side game less than 48 hours after playing the full ninety minutes of England’s 1-0 win over Norway on Wednesday night.

 

You don’t need a sports science degree to know that a player with a history of muscular problems should not be overworked like that.

 

And as if that wasn’t bad enough, Rodgers also revealed that Sturridge warned the England staff he was at risk of being injured if his specialist training routine was disrupted. Those warnings were ignored, and lo and behold Sturridge was injured. Still, he’s due back for England’s next international, so no harm done eh Roy?

 

These are quotes from Rodgers in today’s Daily Telegraph

 

“From images I’ve seen Daniel’s actually sprinted with the ball nearly 50 yards, three-quarters of the pitch, to shoot and that’s when he pulls up. That’s where the issues are. We’re obviously disappointed because we feel it was an injury which could have been prevented.

 

“Here we look at the individual player. Think of Daniel’s week. He plays a high-level game at Tottenham on Sunday, goes away and meets up with the [England] squad on Monday. I believe on the Tuesday they did a session which he was involved in. Then he played a second game on the Wednesday. On the Friday it would be an active recovery for us. After the game, 48 hours later, is critical for recovery.

 

“I think clubs work differently at times to international teams. It’s more the recovery strategy. When we look at our players here, we look at them individually in terms of what their needs are. Fast players would have a second day’s recovery, while other players can work on that day. When you are that type of quick player like Daniel Sturridge, Raheem Sterling and boys like Danny Welbeck, you need to recover them. Sturridge has worked so hard over pre-season and looked very fit and strong in our last game against Tottenham."

 

Asked if the England team were made aware of Sturridge’s particular training programme, Rodgers said:

 

“Absolutely. The players go there and tell the associations how they work. Of course it’s always up to the manager of the association. And on that second day they can do tactical work but for us and the methods of how we work, that can only be low to moderate intensity in small spaces, or you get injuries.

 

“I have good relations with Roy [Hodgson]. We speak, I give him the run-down on all our young players, their positioning, and all that. I’m one who is very pro the national teams. I am an Irishman and I actually want to help England. The core of our team is based around that.

 

"Look at Jordan Henderson the other night, playing in a diamond and he’s very fluid because he knows how to work it. Look at Raheem, he knows how to work it. We want to help them but this doesn’t help them and certainly doesn’t help us, especially when they know how we work.”

 

The worst part of it all is that there is absolutely nothing to prevent this happening again next time. Liverpool’s players have their own individually tailored training programmes but when they go and join up with their countries (not just England) that goes out of the window.

 

It seems farcical that clubs pay these players such vast amounts of money but have no control over what happens when they join up with their countries.If Roy Hodgson wants to “test a player’s resolve” by making him play when he’s injured, there’s nothing in place to stop him. If he wants to dismiss the advice of Liverpool’s medical people and ignore the concerns of a player who knows his own body much better than the England staff could possibly do, there’s nothing to stop him.

 

This isn't the first time it's happened, and you can be sure it won't be the last either.

User Feedback

Recommended Comments



I know but am annoyed so talking utter shite.

The shenanigans over Sturridges training routine gives Rodgers the moral high ground. He should be using that every time to clang Hodgson and his backroom staff about the head with.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

International football the pinnacle?

I don't buy it. Champions league shits all over international football quality wise, simply because you are looking at the best teams in the world that have been put together.

You dont need to buy it. Show me one player who would swap his world cup winners medalfor a CL winners medal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

International football the pinnacle?

 

I don't buy it. Champions league shits all over international football quality wise, simply because you are looking at the best teams in the world that have been put together.

Every sportsperson wants to represent their country. It's about pride, not money.

 

As an LFC fan I am happy with Rodger's stance. But Brendan needs , after only three seasons as a PL manager, to avoid to appear to be Billy Big Bollocks. It doesn't last forever.

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You dont need to buy it. Show me one player who would swap his world cup winners medalfor a CL winners medal.

You'll never sell international footy to me, it is meaningless shite to me.

 

I am probably in the minority with that view but it is how I see it. I honestly don't see the pull and I can honestly say that if I was good enough to have been a footballer that my dream would have been to play for Liverpool and not England.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Brazil v Germany, you didn't watch it, avoided the highlights, still don't know the score etc? 

 

I am with you on putting the club first though. Back before the Premier league, representing your country was the pinnacle, but they have devalued it, like so many other things, so they can't expect the supporters to keep losing their club's best players to injury. Different times call for different priorities. We pay the players so we expect to see them whenever they should be available. When England start to pay the wages of Sturridge while he is useless to us, we can talk about it, until then, fuckoff Woy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every sportsperson wants to represent their country. It's about pride, not money.As an LFC fan I am happy with Rodger's stance. But Brendan needs , after only three seasons as a PL manager, to avoid to appear to be Billy Big Bollocks. It doesn't last forever.

If you was a cynic, just a bit of posturing. A media savvy manager picks a battle that does not exist with the least popular man(Hodgson). Serves as a nice distraction, as for the first time a few questions are being asked. Hodgson may well be a dithering old fool, but not sure discussing this in public solves anything, other than a few brownie points for Rodgers. I'm pretty sure Sturridge won't start at WBA so it is unlikely he would have got called up anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll never sell international footy to me, it is meaningless shite to me.

 

I am probably in the minority with that view but it is how I see it. I honestly don't see the pull and I can honestly say that if I was good enough to have been a footballer that my dream would have been to play for Liverpool and not England.

 

I support Liverpool more than I support England too, but I'm just pointing out to you the reality in the eyes of the FA and the players themselves.  Whether we agree with it or not is irrelevant.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll never sell international footy to me, it is meaningless shite to me.

 

I am probably in the minority with that view but it is how I see it. I honestly don't see the pull and I can honestly say that if I was good enough to have been a footballer that my dream would have been to play for Liverpool and not England.

The Brazil World Cup finals was one of the best international football tournaments in living memory. What player would not want to be part of that?

 

No one would argue that club football is your bread and butter. But as a club player you just carry the hopes and dreams of (part of) your town or city. As an international you carry the hopes and dreams of an entire country. That's a big difference.

 

As a player, the value of your commercial deals soars as an international because of the increased exposure, you also get to play in places that you would never go to as a club player.

 

From an LFC point of view, with us having been out of the CL for so long, international football is vital at the moment to bring the likes of Sturridge and Sterling up to speed.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From an LFC point of view, with us having been out of the CL for so long, international football is vital at the moment to bring the likes of Sturridge and Sterling up to speed.

 

not in their case it isn't.  Primarily because the England set up seems to be exclusively manned by fuckwits who don't listen to advice about individual players given by their clubs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AuY61eSCQAAXyiD.jpg

 

when i gwow up im going to be a formidable football manager, oh yes, there will be no light twaining for my players oh no, oh yes thats wight,  wun! wun! wun them into the gwound! ..is what i say.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The simple point of the matter is that the retarded cunt leading the mediocre England set up has seemingly gone out of his way to ignore the requests of Liverpool Football Club when dealing with the physical well being of their players.

 

We have every right to expect that our players' well being would be ensured while they are on international 'duty'. This obviously isn't the case so we have every reason to deny England the opportunity to further endanger the physical condition of our players.

 

I actually detest international football interrupting the league season. I support Liverpool and no other team matters. If my club suffers because of the demands of the national team then I'm with Rodgers all the way in telling them to go and fuck themselves.

 

Shove internationals to the close season. Qualifying games for the major competitions could be concentrated in the two to three weeks from the end of May, done over two years as they are now. Shite like friendlies and the Confederation Cup could be abolished and players could still get their couple of weeks in Ibiza, LA or Jamaica before coming back to prepare for an uninterrupted league season.

 

 

Did I say that Hodgson is a cunt?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From an LFC point of view, with us having been out of the CL for so long, international football is vital at the moment to bring the likes of Sturridge and Sterling up to speed.

I don't think it's very relevant. International football at the lower levels (ie, not playing the powerhouses) is slow-paced and utterly boring. The modern club game is nothing like that anymore, and that includes the Champions League. Look at how Ludogorets took the game to us, at Anfield. That's as shit a team as you'll see in the CL, and they still played at pace, on the break, away from home.

 

Put it this way, if Balotelli wasn't going away for Italy internationals then I'd be very keen to make Sturridge and Balotelli train together intensely for a couple of weeks.

 

I DO think that the international break is a chance for Sturridge to get some minutes though, so I don't agree with Rodgers. It also gives him time to train alongside Sterling, Henderson, Lambert and Lallana. SO it's not a wasted journey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

From an LFC point of view, with us having been out of the CL for so long, international football is vital at the moment to bring the likes of Sturridge and Sterling up to speed.

 

No.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

The CL matters to our club, it almost defines it.

 

If you think that PL football prepares you for CL football you are mistaken.

 

The WC was a wake up call for Sterling and Sturridge as to how much they need to improve to excel at the top. CL football is probably the highest standard, but international games are an important part of career development for those two inparticular.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not necessarily international football thats devalued, it's England. It's the fact that the british public know we're shit and the old "come on ingurland can win it" bollocks of yesteryear has morphed into a complete acceptance of our inferiority. 

 

it's the qualifying rounds that are devalued, nobody devalues the World Cup or the Euro's, i'm sure the German players look forward to playing together. Unfortunately we've got an imbecile in charge that seeks to injure his only decent striker at every available opportunity to test his resolve and also get back at the club that unceremoniously booted him for being a yes man that couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CL matters to our club, it almost defines it.

 

If you think that PL football prepares you for CL football you are mistaken.

 

The WC was a wake up call for Sterling and Sturridge as to how much they need to improve to excel at the top. CL football is probably the highest standard, but international games are an important part of career development for those two inparticular.

 

Three games under Roy Hodgson is no preparation for, or sign of, anything. 

 

It wasn't a "wake up" call for anyone other than the deluded fucking mongs of the English public who seemed to be oblivious to just how shit a manager Hodgson is.

 

International football, under Hodgson, or whoever the inevitably shit replacement will be in a few years, will have nothing but a negative effect on players like Sturridge and Sterling. Learning how to play a style of football that stopped being relevant 20 years ago, and picking up unnecessary injuries.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three games under Roy Hodgson is no preparation for, or sign of, anything. 

 

It wasn't a "wake up" call for anyone other than the deluded fucking mongs of the English public who seemed to be oblivious to just how shit a manager Hodgson is.

 

International football, under Hodgson, or whoever the inevitably shit replacement will be in a few years, will have nothing but a negative effect on players like Sturridge and Sterling. Learning how to play a style of football that stopped being relevant 20 years ago, and picking up unnecessary injuries.

That'll do. Spot on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...