Jump to content
tlw content
tlw content

Liverpool 1 Tottenham Hotspur 1 (May 7 2022)

     

     
    dave_usher.jpg
     
    Report by
    Dave Usher

This doesn’t hurt anywhere near as much as I thought it would. It helps that we’ve got two finals to look forward to of course, but I just can’t get too worked up or disappointed about this particular game or even the implications of it. 

 

We gave everything we had but came up short because the opponent defended really well. If we don’t win the title it won’t be because of this game and it won’t be because Newcastle put up the most feeble of resistance at the Etihad a day later (did anyone really expect any different?). 

 

I’m more upset about the other game we had with Spurs than this one. Remember, when a couple of manc officials shafted us with two of the worst decisions seen all season? We deserved to win that game, we didn’t deserve to win this one.

 

I think we played pretty well though and there was a lot to like about the performance. Against most teams it would have been enough for a comfortable victory, but the problem is that Spurs are really good when they play the better teams. They beat City twice and that wasn’t a fluke. 

 

This was always going to be the toughest game we had left but because it was a night game at Anfield I thought that would be enough to help us come through it unscathed. It wasn’t, although the crowd played its part and the atmosphere was great. The players responded and the intensity was there but the quality was lacking. Sometimes that happens, even to the best teams. Winning every game just isn’t possible and when it comes to retreats when we look back on the season, this game really shouldn’t even be a consideration.

 

It was just really fucking tough. Try as we might, we just couldn’t really play through them and when we did they usually had someone making a great block or clearance. Hugo Lloris hardly had a save to make and we didn’t really do enough to test him. We were almost there on a lot of occasions but just didn’t get it right when we got into promising positions.

 

Klopp went with the team most of us would have picked and I don’t think a lack of energy or freshness was the problem. Trent and Robbo weren’t at their very best and maybe they were a little leggy but I honesty thought the team looked fresh and full of energy. We just came up against a really well organised opponent who know how to pack their box and play on the break.

 

But for most of the game we were so good with our counter press that Spurs weren’t able to launch the counter attacks they are so dangerous from. The first half especially we restricted it almost entirely. I think they had one break which ended with them hitting the post, but apart from that we smothered them whenever they tried to break.

 

The problem was we found it difficult to create anything clear ourselves. There were lots of nearly moments and Van Dijk headed against the bar from a corner, but the only time Lloris was really made to work was when his own player mis-directed a header and he had to scramble across his line to claw the ball off the head of Salah.

 

The second half was slightly different and Spurs were able to get out more and hurt us. They did it really well when they were able to and their goal was well worked. Shite from us like, but well worked from them. I’m not sure what had happened prior to it but I’m assuming we must have had to defend a corner as Trent and Robbo were on opposite flanks and that usually only happens when we’ve defended a set piece. 

 

It played a big part in the goal as we were disjointed and never got proper set in our usual shape. Trent didn’t cover himself in glory in not getting tight to Kane and Robbo then compounded the problem by tracking the run of Son instead of letting him go offside. In doing that he played Sessegnon onside and he crossed for Son to score from close range.

 

Bad from us, good from them. They had another chance soon after too as we were wobbling. At one point they went the length of the pitch, starting with a short goal kick, and played right through our press and ended up creating a chance. That never happens to us, but this was hard.

 

Klopp rang the changes and sent on Jota and Tsimikas for Hendo and Robbo. I can see why Kostas was brought on as Robbo has played a lot of footy and he wasn’t at his best. Kostas should start at Villa I reckon.

 

Hendo going off wasn’t a huge surprise either but it wasn’t a reflection on how he’d played. I thought he was fine, but Klopp wanted to go with the 4-2-4 we saw turn the derby game in our favour. The difference here is it was Jota and not Divock. who came on. More on this later.

 

The crowd were really cranking it up trying to get the lads going and when Diaz drew us level the noise was spine tingling. The goal was a fluke as his shot was headed towards one corner and was deflected into the opposite corner off the boot of a defender, but it was no more than he deserved for his desire and enthusiasm.

 

The problem was that none of the other forwards were having any joy as there was hardly any space to operate in. Mo was so tightly marked all day as Spurs were effectively playing with two left backs in Sessegnon and Davies. If he escaped one there was always a second one there. Trent was playing inside and the only time we were able to get around the side was when Hendo made an overlapping run. 

 

When you play a team who defends like Spurs, the space is down the sides and you’ve got to get around the back to get your crosses in. Instead we were putting crosses in from deep and that’s a waste of time when there are so many big players in the box. Spurs had three centre backs, two pretty tall wing backs and both of their centre midfielders are big strong lads too. We played right into their hands too often. 

 

In his last 16 games Mo has only scored from open play in one of them (the Mancs at Anfield when he bagged a brace). That’s blown my mind. I honestly wouldn’t have thought that was even possible but the maddest thing about it is that I don’t think he’s playing badly. I can’t remember too many games where I’ve thought “Mo’s been shite here”. He hasn’t always been brilliant but it’s not like he’s noticeably struggling. 

 

Yet his goal record in the last 16 games is proper shit. It hasn’t really mattered because we’ve been winning every game anyway, but this was one game when we really needed that bit of magic from him. Sadly he couldn’t deliver and Spurs dealt with him quite easily really. Sadio fared no better either, and Jota was poor when he came on.

 

Diaz was the only one that posed any real threat and it’s genuinely staggering that Origi didn’t get on. I was a bit miffed about it afterwards but the more I’ve thought about it, the more irritated I’ve become and as I write this two days later I’m proper pissed off about it. Why would you not bring Divock on? Why? It’s fucking madness. He was put on this earth for exactly this kind of situation and he’s delivered for us so many times. Instead we got an out of form Jota and Naby fucking Keita.

 

Nothing against Naby, but what the fuck was that change going to do? Utterly pointless change. Divock is the ultimate ‘break glass in case of emergency’ player. This is what he does, but he can’t do it sat on the fucking bench. That’s my only gripe about this game but it’s a pretty fucking big gripe the more I think about it.

 

I can even make a case that this is a good point because we could have lost this game. After going a goal down I’d have probably taken a draw at that point because we hadn’t really looked like scoring. Then we get the equaliser and there’s plenty of time left so I’m thinking we’ll pull it out of the fire because that’s what we usually do. But it never really looked like happening and Spurs probably carried a bigger threat. They could have won it late on but Hoijberg headed back across goal instead of going for it himself.

 

So given the way the game went a draw isn’t bad and if City do come a cropper somewhere then the equaliser from Diaz might prove crucial. Probably not, it’s unlikely City will lose a game and even if they do we’ve blown the goal difference advantage we had by not punishing shite like Everton and Newcastle recently.

 

Imagine if we lost the title on goal difference. Fucking hell. I’ve been going on about that Leicester game for months, but I tell you something, if we miss out on goal difference that won’t be the game I look at. I’ll go back to Old Trafford. 5-0 up, United down to ten men and half an hour still to play. And we just declared. It pissed me off at the time and it will piss me off even more if it turns out that it all comes down to goal difference.

 

It probably won’t but it is not beyond the realms of possibility that City lose at Wolves or West Ham. Put it this way, if we had those two away fixtures coming up next, would you be thinking “that’s two definite wins for us” or would you be a bit uneasy about it? I wouldn’t be taking those wins as guaranteed, so why are we not thinking that City might just slip up? They probably won’t, but they absolutely could. This isn’t mission impossible.

 

The problem is for me is that we could fail to beat Villa this week, and if that happens it won’t matter what City do because it will be all but over anyway. At the start of the season the league was the one I most wanted but if we get revenge on Madrid to bring home number seven I doubt I’ll feel even the slightest bit of disappointment if we can’t catch City. 

 

I just have this gut feeling that either Wolves or West Ham are going to do something though you know. Part of me hopes they don’t because if they were to lose and we missed out because we didn’t win out or - even worse - because we’ve let our goal difference advantage slip, that would be much harder to take than if City just won every game. We’ll see. 

 

Star man is Diaz. 

 

 

Team: Alisson; Alexander-Arnold, Konate, Van Dijk, Robertson (Tsimikas); Fabinho (Keita), Henderson (Jota), Thiago; Salah, Mané, Diaz:

 

 

Edited by tlw content


User Feedback

Recommended Comments

13 minutes ago, tlw content said:

 

 
dave_usher.jpg
 
Report by
Dave Usher

 

This doesn’t hurt anywhere near as much as I thought it would. It helps that we’ve got two finals to look forward to of course, but I just can’t get too worked up or disappointed about this particular game or even the implications of it. 

 

We gave everything we had but came up short because the opponent defended really well. If we don’t win the title it won’t be because of this game and it won’t be because Newcastle put up the most feeble of resistance at the Etihad a day later (did anyone really expect any different?). 

 

I’m more upset about the other game we had with Spurs than this one. Remember, when a couple of manc officials shafted us with two of the worst decisions seen all season? We deserved to win that game, we didn’t deserve to win this one.

 

 

Please note that Match Reports are only available to website subscribers. Subscriptions cost just £3 a month (you need to register first) and can be purchased here. 

 

 

 

 


Just on this point on where the league was “lost”.

 

It was not lost anywhere.

 

It was won by Man City, because they’ve unlimited resources with a fantastic manager.

 

Ali did not lose to Frazier. Frazier beat Ali. That happens sometimes when the best in the business go at it.

 

As I understand it, our points total over the last four years is now separated by only four? We’re the two best teams in the world and next year it will be City saying if, but, when etc.

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my instinct but I think Mo dries up every season he has been here 

It is churlish to think that as others need to step up but Mo "losing " that finish at the end of this season was not a suprise.

His numbers are off the scale and last season he carried us, but curious to see a 10 game split of his goals per season.

Good to have you back sir.

Great report as always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kevin D said:


Just on this point on where the league was “lost”.

 

It was not lost anywhere.

 

It was won by Man City, because they’ve unlimited resources with a fantastic manager.

 

Ali did not lose to Frazier. Frazier beat Ali. That happens sometimes when the best in the business go at it.

 

As I understand it, our points total over the last four years is now separated by only four? We’re the two best teams in the world and next year it will be City saying if, but, when etc.

 

That's how losers talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plenty of good points made there Dave, I do think the assessment of Mo is a bit kind though. He’s been off form for a while now and hasn’t done much to endear by sometimes being greedy. Call it trying to play himself back into form if you like, but there’s been a few occasions, including Spurs on Saturday, where there were players better placed who deserved the pass from him that was on.

Insane that he might be getting criticised I know, given his numbers, but there it is.

Also the points made regarding goal difference and us taking it easy in some games, not just the Man U 5-0, when we could have run up a bigger score and made goal difference unimportant, are really on the money.

It’ll be gut wrenching if city win this having scored a couple more than us against dross.

They are unlikely to drop points though, and I just think that any hopes of Villa, Wolves or West Ham taking points off them are fanciful, but we can all hope they do.

We have to be perfect from tomorrow night at Villa until the final whistle at the Stade de France and that might be too much of an ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst talking about the decisions against us in the Spurs away game let's not forget the unbelievable decisions that favoured city in their games against Wolves and the bitters. That's a 4 point swing right off.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wondering. If we beat Villa 3-0 and Wolves beat City 2-1, the goal difference will be exactly the same with both teams on 90-23.

 

If we happen to end equal on points and goal difference, I reckon most scored goals could separate the teams. But if even that is equal, what happens? Will there be a PL-final at Wembley or something?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, JustTosh said:

Just wondering. If we beat Villa 3-0 and Wolves beat City 2-1, the goal difference will be exactly the same with both teams on 90-23.

 

If we happen to end equal on points and goal difference, I reckon most scored goals could separate the teams. But if even that is equal, what happens? Will there be a PL-final at Wembley or something?

 

 

I reckon they''ll just give it to us as citeh are cunts.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Creator Supreme said:

We won't be within 30 points of City next season. They'll go unbeaten and beat their 100 point total, Haaland will score about 50 in the league for them. And they'll win the CL.

 

Honestly, the best thing I have to look forward to about next season is Everton losing their last claim to fame, when Haaland breaks Dixie Dean's scoring record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good report Dave. Reflects what I've been thinking except that I don't think we declared at OT - more a case that we just decided not to risk injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, aws said:

Good report Dave. Reflects what I've been thinking except that I don't think we declared at OT - more a case that we just decided not to risk injury. 

 

Dave already used you as his muscle to intimidate me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kevin D said:

 

Dave already used you as his muscle to intimidate me.

Don't make it worse for yourself. We haven't ruled out going for exemplary and punitive damages yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree on Mo. I think he's been pretty poor for quite a while. Basically since Afcon.

 

I also think you go very easy on Trent here. He gets the praise when he deserves it. But I thought he had a shocker in every respect.

 

With those two players on that kind of form on one side of the pitch, it's a good job we brought Diaz in to offer a threat on the other side. But I can see Madrid causing serious damage on our right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Strontium said:

 

Honestly, the best thing I have to look forward to about next season is Everton losing their last claim to fame, when Haaland breaks Dixie Dean's scoring record.

I don't think he'll score 60+ mate, but he will score a ridiculous amount of goals in that team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, aws said:

Good report Dave. Reflects what I've been thinking except that I don't think we declared at OT - more a case that we just decided not to risk injury. 

 

Nonetheless, when you're lamenting a 5-0 win at OT as a missed opportunity, it's pretty emblematic of how difficult it is to enjoy the Premier League with Abu Dhabi City around.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, tlw content said:

We gave everything we had but came up short because the opponent defended really well

Totally agree same team beat City. Some of the comments are mind blowing, if I've read them correctly we need to replace half a team that is still within touching distance of a clean sweep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought Mo and Trent were probably our two of our worst performers, and I love both, particularly Trent. Salah's insistence on ignoring the better option towards the end was extremely annoying, and Trent's hopeful punts from deep were equally frustrating, desperate and low-percentage as they were.

 

A quick word on the subs, though, as I agreed with them at the time. We clearly needed someone to go past people or make passes between the lines, Keita in for Henderson was my preferred choice from the start of the match, so can't say I objected to that. If anything, he should have been brought on sooner. Thinking of it, Curtis could have done the same, but he normally favours playing on the left, and you're not subbing Thiago, are you? If we were going to put balls into the box, Jota was a logical sub as well, as he's probably the best header of the ball we have. I can understand him getting on before Origi in that respect.

 

I think Klopp and his team have done an incredible job of keeping the players fresh, but have to admit I think the one position he/they could have done better is the left back role. There's absolutely no need to have Robbo gasping for air three matches in succession when you have a back-up the caliber of Kostas. Robbo was poor against Villareal, and not much better here. For all his other qualities, his incredible stamina and energy is his biggest asset. That asset becomes a bit murkier with the amount of footy he's played recently. I hope Kostas starts tonight, he deserves to, and we need Robbo back to his energetic best on Saturday.

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a scenario where a team are doubling up on Salah then the answer would be exploiting the space this has created for our other strikers? We must have seen it coming so you train all week playing in Mane and Diaz at every opportunity from the first minute, leaving their fiendish "Salah" plan in tatters as the goals rain in.

 

 

 

* I havent seen the game so maybe thats what we did, just not very well. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...