Jump to content
tlw content
tlw content

Reds set to un-fire the Lazar?

According to the Liverpool ECHO the Reds have the option to recall Lazar Markovic from his loan spell at Fenerbahce in the January window, and Jurgen Klopp “is likely” to do it.

 

Markovic was sent to Turkey for the year by former boss Brendan Rodgers who never really fancied him, but the club (not Rodgers) were always adamant that he would return. Usually season long loans cannot be cut short unless the other club decides to send the player back, so it’s interesting that Liverpool have the option to recall the player as it suggests there was no loan fee involved.

 

Perhaps the club were planning for the very situation that developed, with Rodgers losing his job and his replacement seeing the £20m Markovic as a viable option? With games coming thick and fast and a growing injury list restricting the manager’s options to rotate, Markovic would have been a useful option to have now, but come January that may not be the case depending on whether or not the Reds progress in the cup competitions.

 

Right now recalling Markovic looks like a good idea, but that may change by the time he is eligible for a return and Klopp will have to weigh up whether or not the Serbian will get games here or if he would be better served playing every week for Fenerbahce.

 

With Joe Gomez now ruled out for the season Andre Wisdom is another loanee who Klopp could really use right now. Handed a contract extension over the summer, he was then promptly shipped off to Norwich where he has featured just twice in the Premier League.

 

The idea was for him to gain experience through regular football, but Norwich aren’t delivering that so perhaps an agreement could be reached to terminate his loan, although with Jon Flanagan due back in December the need for full back cover may be less pressing.

 

 

 

Can the Reds win the Europa League? Check out bet365 offers

User Feedback

Recommended Comments



When I watched him for benefice I thought he was brilliant and was made up when we signed him. God knows what we do to some players when we sign them. We must put them in a chamber like in Superman 2 and take away all their powers.

 

It's not what we do it's what Rodgers does to them. Dropping him after a few games, inexplicably, before playing him as a wing back, both left and right, then throwing him under the bus when he doesn't turn into Dani Alves in three weeks. 

 

How can you come to a new league, where you don't speak the language, play in a position that's alien to you and succeed straight away in a team spearheaded by Mario Balotelli?

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF we don't give him a chance, we can't fuck him off again once we've decided he's properly shit. I want him to give me Johnson levels of anger before I say goodbye. The shithouse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't get a chance. Give the lad a fucking chance. Honey and nut, bitches. 

 

It really is that simple. Also, if Fenerbahce can win the league there, he'll have 5 league titles to his name in 3 different countries by age 22. That's impressive whichever way you look at it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markovic will be the full hog loss with no sale.

 

No one even wanted the fucker on loan for free!

 

Don't think anyone should be judging any of the committee signings based on what they did under Brendan.

 

Look at Firmino.  Under Rodgers he had about 10 games, no goals, no assists.  Now he has 7 goals and 7 assists in the league in 18 games under Klopp.  Completely different player.

 

I would suggest we should at least give Markovic a chance under Klopp.  Could be he comes back and isn't any better than Ibe, in which case we'll sell him (someone will probably give us 15m, there's zero chance he'd be anywhere near as bad a loss as Downing).  Could be he comes back and is a really valuable backup for a year or two while he reaches his full potential.

 

Either way, after seeing what's happened to Firmino I've decided that all the players who didn't perform under Brendan are getting a pass in my book until they've proven rubbish under a real manager.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think anyone should be judging any of the committee signings based on what they did under Brendan.

 

Look at Firmino. Under Rodgers he had about 10 games, no goals, no assists. Now he has 7 goals and 7 assists in the league in 18 games under Klopp. Completely different player.

 

I would suggest we should at least give Markovic a chance under Klopp. Could be he comes back and isn't any better than Ibe, in which case we'll sell him (someone will probably give us 15m, there's zero chance he'd be anywhere near as bad a loss as Downing). Could be he comes back and is a really valuable backup for a year or two while he reaches his full potential.

 

Either way, after seeing what's happened to Firmino I've decided that all the players who didn't perform under Brendan are getting a pass in my book until they've proven rubbish under a real manager.

Including Balotelli?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Including Balotelli?

 

OK, maybe "getting a pass" was a bit strong, though I do think he'd be miles better under Klopp than he was under Rodgers. 

 

While I would be very intrigued to see Balotelli working under Klopp, I suspect it would probably end in tears as he's poorly suited to the rampaging-around-pressuring-defenders-and-then-starting-quick-breaks style Klopp will be looking to develop.  Sell him to China and see if we can't get most of our money back.

 

But for most of the rest of them, I'd like to see them at least given a chance under Klopp.  I doubt it will happen in most of their cases, but the likes of Alberto would be interesting.  I particularly think Gomez will shine under Klopp even more than he did under Rodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my feline opinion, he should be stopped in the borders of the Glorious Independent State of Merseyside (the nicest part on the rainy little island), then interrogated regarding his view on IslamoNazism and Erdogan, searched, examined and then let the German decide. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing what Klopp has done with Benteke seems to make it pretty obvious that he wouldn't have had a bar of Balotelli.

 

Theres a rumour on another thread that their is a pocket of 'KLOPP doubters' active within the website and people are writing him off. Sounds like you're one of them? 

 

Anything further to say?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theres a rumour on another thread that their is a pocket of 'KLOPP doubters' active within the website and people are writing him off. Sounds like you're one of them?

 

Anything further to say?

Not sure how you came to that conclusion. I was purely going off the fact that Klopp hasn't picked Benteke because he offers no movement up front. Balotelli's movement is even worse and he gives less of a shit so I doubt he would get anywhere near the team if he was here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one of our bizzare decisions was instead of loaning him to a top Championship club for a season to learn the British style of football and toughen him up we sent him on a jolly in the sun.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one of our bizzare decisions was instead of loaning him to a top Championship club for a season to learn the British style of football and toughen him up we sent him on a jolly in the sun.

 

"Wish you were here m8 xx!"

 

tumblr_n7662hmfyb1t669p5o1_500.jpg

 

Really though, you think Turkish league is a jolly in the sun?

 

n_48980_1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one of our bizzare decisions was instead of loaning him to a top Championship club for a season to learn the British style of football and toughen him up we sent him on a jolly in the sun.

Think he's a bit above Championship level. Didn't he win two league titles in two different countries before coming here? The championship is hardly gonna get him used to the British game either.

 

I have no idea if he'll make it here or not. I don't think he's a shithouse, he puts a shift in defensively, but he is a bit lightweight. I'd just like to see him given a chance in his favoured position. He's one of those I could see coming back in the summer and making an instant impact in the first month or two, but doubt he'll be a starter as the season progresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there are premiership sides who would've taken him on loan but I'm not sure of any that fit our style under Rodgers who was making those decisions at the time. That's something often overlooked with loans I think. The league quality is obviously important but for me it would be wise to send a player to a team that plays similar to how our team intends to play, granted it's not always possible and under Rodgers it seemed to change with by the season anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...