Jump to content
tlw content
tlw content

Enough is Enough, It's Time to Welcome Michael Owen Home - by Chris Smith

The thing I’ve enjoyed most about Jamie Carragher’s podcast is the incredible forthrightness of the interviews. The shared context, friendship and experiences with his guests provides an incredible platform for honest conversations – far exceeding the cookie cutter Q&As we hear in the vast majority of interviews conducted by actual journalists. 
 
Carra’s standing, and aversion to sugar-coating anything, enables him to frame questions in a way that would be downright insulting coming from a reporter. It’s what made the recent episode with Michael Owen such a startlingly brutal and uncomfortable listen. 
 
If you came out of that interview still unwilling to bury the hatchet with Michael Owen and finally welcome him home, then I’d advise you to contact someone with a stethoscope.
 
Michael’s story, as told on The Greatest Game, sounded like the clichéd sports movie, charting the incredible highs, then the depths of despair. It was set-up for the final act – the inevitable, uplifting redemption, but in Owen’s case, there is no feel-good ending. If the Robbie Fowler story could draw comparisons to Rocky, Owen’s could be likened to the end of Raging Bull.
 
Put it this way: Michael Owen, who scored 158 goals for his club and thrice tried to get back home after his initial departure, now feels intimidated when he walks into Anfield. “Any Liverpool fan has the power to break my heart,” he said. Jesus, I don’t know about any of you, but hearing that just about broke mine. 
 
It’s not right. Owen brought as much joy to the old stadium as any individual in the last quarter century; that much is indisputable. Yet, as Carragher brutally pointed out, Owen gets no love, his career and contributions are glossed over. Or, to use Carragher’s word “dismissed”. 
 
I’ll be honest with you. Michael was my guy. At the time I’d have argued “Michael over Robbie” with anyone. My best mate and I still joke about it to this day (how lucky were we to have those two to playfully argue over by the way?). 
 
I’d never really resented him for leaving, but it did break my heart. I never hated him for signing for Newcastle because I was privy to information he desperately wanted to come home and was distraught to be going there. I wasn’t among those screaming “where were you in Istanbul?” in his face, because what was the point?
 
It wasn’t even as if I felt signing for United was unforgivable given his predicament. For me, a fissure tore into a gaping crevasse the day he scored the winner in that Manchester derby (as unreal a finish as it was). I hadn’t seen him celebrate quite so exuberantly in a decade. I hadn’t seen that joy since he was a teenager and, as he raced behind the Stretford End goal, hadn’t seen him run that fast either. How could he be that happy doing that, there, for them? At the time when we were in the utter depths of the Gillet and Hicks era, with Rafa’s tenure coming to an end, it was an absolute sickener. 
 
For many, it confirmed what they had felt all along. It was the first time I believed it too – that Michael Owen cared only about Michael Owen. It didn’t matter which shirt he was wearing. On that day he was happy for himself, not for Man United. And now, in the context of his interview with Carragher, it’s a little bit easier to see why.
 
Many will still feel like Owen got what was coming, that he made his own bed and thus doesn’t deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as other Liverpool greats. That’s fine. But there’s also a staggering hypocrisy here that’s bothered me for decades. It seems you can be terrible, as a man and a footballer, but as long as you’re pushed out of the door, rather than leave on your own terms, you’re welcomed back to Liverpool with open arms.
 
The ovations afforded to a returning David James down the years, for example. Here’s someone that made an absolute mockery of us, his manager and the entire club, quantifiably costing us a title during his time on his PlayStation, or modelling, or whatever else he was doing while flailing around between the sticks. James and Owen both broke my heart. Michael for leaving us when he did, James for being abjectly terrible at his job and causing us to lose football matches.  
 
One of the two feels intimidated walking into Anfield for fear of abuse, the other would probably get a standing ovation if he turned out for one of those Liverpool Legends games.
 
More recently, the reverse is somehow true. It seems a player can force his way out in the most egregious manner and still be remembered fondly. His recent roasting at Anfield aside, the esteem in which Luis Suarez is held absolutely staggers me. Carra mentioned this too. Some of my best mates have him in all-time Liverpool five-a-side teams. I can’t scream this loud enough, but to Hell with Luis Suarez. 
 
This bloke went on strike to force a move to Arsenal (to Arsenal), bit opponents and racially abused others. Our reputation is yet to fully recover from our association with that ‘loveable little scamp,’ as evidenced by the recent, long overdue apology to Evra and the coverage it received. I feel ashamed for supporting him at the time. 
 
Between Owen and Suarez, which is the club annually falling over itself to wish a happy birthday? Here’s a clue: It’s not the one who ran himself into utter physical degradation before his mid-20s, while wearing the red shirt. Nor is it the one who won a Ballon D’Or in the same year he helped us to a cup treble. 
 
Owen’s contribution to the modern history of Liverpool far eclipses Suarez’s season or so of giving a damn. Even Stan Collymore enjoys a higher standing than Michael Owen among some Liverpool fans on social media. Seriously.

 

 

 

Even the aversion to Fernando Torres has faded these days. Everyone seems alright with him again with the club often commemorating his contribution more and more often. I promised myself I’d never love another footballer again after he went to Chelsea; then Klopp’s lads came along and now I’m besotted with the lot of them, but that’s beside the point.
 
Speaking of Chelsea, remember when Steven Gerrard tried to force a move there? If Gerrard’s explanation for how that situation came to pass (Papa Rafa didn’t show him enough love, etc.) is understood then why can’t Michael’s reasons for heading to Real Madrid, when all along his plan was to just “do a Rushie” and come back after a year? The answer’s rhetorical, if we’re honest with ourselves. 
 
After developing an Alan Shearer-like reputation for bland, guarded interviews during his playing career, Michael has been an open book since his retirement. Especially regarding his injuries and his self-professed rapid decline. We’ve had a window into Owen the person. Maybe that’s what has me warming to him again? The fact that, away from his horses, his millions and his media career, he’s a guy with insecurities, with regrets, with fears and apprehension. It’s a great leveller. 
 
I don’t know how the current impasse changes. Maybe it starts with the club affording him the same respect it does to other, less deserving folks, through its constant content output? If they can get off Suarez’s lap for five minutes that is. For all their talk about the “LFC family” they aren’t half choosy about who is treated as such. 
 
People shouldn’t need reminding just how good Michael Owen was, but if that’s what needs to happen, it should. There’s no reason for this continued antipathy or, perhaps even worse, utter apathy. 
 
That might be the hardest thing about this for Owen. Right now, he doesn’t matter. He’s not loved, nor particularly hated. Just irrelevant. Some will say that’s his punishment. After listening to his side of the story, I’d counter by saying, “for what exactly?”
 
Carragher brutally pointed out that, while he finished his career with a guard of honour and a Kop mosaic, Michael went out coming off the bench for Tony Pulis’ Stoke. Wasn’t that punishment enough? 
 
Enough is enough. It’s time to recognise Michael Owen’s contribution for what it was. On the stat sheets, to the numbers on that increasingly-active “Wall of Champions” and in our mind’s eye. 
 
“One-nil down, two-one up, Michael Owen won the cup.” Remember that? 
 
Like many others, the story isn’t straight forward. There are complications. But Michael Owen is unquestionably a Liverpool great and deserves to be spoken of as such. It’s time to end the story in the right way. 

 

Chris Smith

@ByChrisSmith

Edited by tlw content


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



Michael should have been a Liverpool legend. That he's not regarded in such esteem is largely down to his own decisions. I don't begrudge him for wanting to leave. I do begrudge him for not being honest about it, promising to stay all the while running down his contract and leaving for peanuts. Still, I wanted him back when he wanted to leave Real. I do begrudge him for not returning to Liverpool and going to fucking Newcastle. He could have come back if he wanted to. As far as I'm concerned, he went to Newcastle for the money. We were never going to match the wages they were offering. And of course then he goes to Man United. He burnt more than a few bridges throughout his career. 

I loved Michael at Liverpool, I truly did and I do feel a bit sad that he's not got the reputation with the fans that his performances deserve. He gave us some amazing memories but he tarnished his own legacy with us and I wouldn't blame any Liverpool fan for not warming to him.

 

As for Suarez and Torres - I care for those two even less to be honest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Chris said:

 

Nah, it's time people for their heads out of the sand on that front. He did it. He was found guilty of doing it. Evra didn't handle it greatly, but as a society we've kinda moved past people telling minorities who feel they've been abused that the particular word, or the expression "my little black friend" isn't racist or wasn't meant in a certain context. 

 

How some people can continue to support him is beyond me. 

Jesus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Crazy Dave said:

100% agree. That's embarrassing revisionism from Owen, that. 

If Rush was happier and more successful in Turin he wouldn't have done "a Rushie" either to be fair.

Different times but he didnt run down his contract though and we were able to replace him with Barnes Beardsley and Aldo rather than Morientes (6 months later) and Nunez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t get this the club we’re idiots letting him run his contract down to a year.  You can’t force a player to sign a contract and you also can’t force them to leave the club and sign a contract elsewhere.  If a player wants to run down his contract no matter what then the club has no say in the matter.  The only tactics the club could use is to try and do what Real are doing with Bale and freeze the player out.  Can you imagine the club freezing Owen out half way through a season where he has got 2 and a half years left on his contract to try to force him to sign or move with 2 years to go?  It honestly baffles me that people never think this shit through and just parrot out the same shite every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, moof said:

Jesus

So you’re still believing steadfastly in that old “it totally means something really friendly and polite in Spanish and wasn’t a racist insult at all” line all these years later, huh? 

 

Bless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that was the weirdest in the interview was when he was adamant he was as big a red as Carragher. This is someone who signed for Man United and he's saying that. And on top of that, he tried to say Carragher could have done the same if he had been in that situation. Surprised people think he came across well. Not that I care, I was too young to watch football in his era, but that was weird. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 3 Stacks said:

The thing that was the weirdest in the interview was when he was adamant he was as big a red as Carragher. This is someone who signed for Man United and he's saying that. And on top of that, he tried to say Carragher could have done the same if he had been in that situation. Surprised people think he came across well. Not that I care, I was too young to watch football in his era, but that was weird. 

Apply Owen's situation to your own life. Would you turn down a job on more money, with better prospects in the right area of the country where your family would be happy for a crappy one, just because that company had a rivalry with one you used to work for? We might not like it and we might expect every single footballer to think with their hearts but that's completely unrealistic. 

 

I don't hate Owen. He left in poor circumstances and he made poor choices subsequently but he seems genuinely remorseful and was responsible for some of my best memories of supporting the club.

 

I also echo the point about his punditry, he seems like an intelligent fella with good insight and he should show it more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Chris said:

So you’re still believing steadfastly in that old “it totally means something really friendly and polite in Spanish and wasn’t a racist insult at all” line all these years later, huh? 

 

Bless. 

No,we simply don't believe the 'evidence' presented and by whom it was presented. Suarez is a cunt,no doubt,but that whole situation was a farce.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Karl_b said:

Apply Owen's situation to your own life. Would you turn down a job on more money, with better prospects in the right area of the country where your family would be happy for a crappy one, just because that company had a rivalry with one you used to work for? We might not like it and we might expect every single footballer to think with their hearts but that's completely unrealistic. 

 

I don't hate Owen. He left in poor circumstances and he made poor choices subsequently but he seems genuinely remorseful and was responsible for some of my best memories of supporting the club.

 

I also echo the point about his punditry, he seems like an intelligent fella with good insight and he should show it more.

Why does he need to apply it to his own life?  Owen was a multi millionaire and made a decision to join a football club who’s fans sing about the deaths of “his” teams fans along with all the other shite they get up to every week.  This is not like working for Tesco and then leaving to work for Sainsbury’s and shouldn’t be treated as such.  I can’t believe people come out with this shite.  This is not some mercenary or foreign player who doesn’t understand this.  He literally grew up at the club and witnessed it himself.  He can go there if he wants but don’t expect people to treat you like Gerrard, Carra or God.

 

He’s not remorseful about going there either.  He’s remorseful about fucking up his legend status by going to Real Madrid and failing whilst we won the European Cup on the greatest night in the clubs history.

 

After making all these decisions which he was completely entitled to make he now wants everyone to love him as well because he wants back in to the boys club at Anfield.  Well he can fuck off.  

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Chris said:

 

Nah, it's time people for their heads out of the sand on that front. He did it. He was found guilty of doing it. Evra didn't handle it greatly, but as a society we've kinda moved past people telling minorities who feel they've been abused that the particular word, or the expression "my little black friend" isn't racist or wasn't meant in a certain context. 

 

How some people can continue to support him is beyond me. 

As a society we've moved past considering context? Agreed.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Istvan Kuntstain said:

Quite a cunt you.


Ah. One thing that never changes about this place. There’s always someone willing to use the strongest word in the English language towards someone they’ve never met because they disagree about football. If you’re not fond of the response, maybe don’t make ridiculous generalisations like “all Spanish speakers” to make your point. 
 

A good day to you, sir. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

As a society we've moved past considering context? Agreed.


All these years on, the mental gymnastics being performed to defend Suarez are incredible 
 

It’s very simple. 
 

Spanish speaking man playing football in England uses term considered racially offensive to insult black Frenchman. Black Frenchman found it offensive. English authorities agreed. 
 

That’s the context, outside of this weird little cult still having none of it because it’s us, it’s Man United and Ferguson and there was some kind of FA / media conspiracy to halt the rise of Liverpool. It’s absolutely batshit. 

Even if, best case scenario, his argument can be believed, that “little black friend” is some sort of term of endearment, and sweet little Luis’ only crime was cultural ignorance, then he was still in the wrong. 
 

There are innumerable things you cannot do/say in other countries due to local context, culture and sensitivities. You get caught, you get punished. Ignorance is not a valid excuse. That’s your best case scenario.
 

But it’s also extremely unlikely.
 

He’s always been a horrible, nasty little shit. His form before and since does nothing to inspire confidence in his innocence. 


 

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Chris said:

It’s very simple. 

No. No it isn't. 

 

I'm not taking this stance because of any desire to defend Suarez. I have a South American mother, and I live in Spain. How people talk about race is different in every country. That's context. Social context, historical context, linguistic context. To pretend it isn't relevant or important is ridiculous.

 

Quote

There are innumerable things you cannot do/say in other countries due to local context, culture and sensitivities. 

Yes, and millions upon millions of people, understandably, frequently make errors in this regard.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

No. No it isn't. 

 

I'm not taking this stance because of any desire to defend Suarez. I have a South American mother, and I live in Spain. How people talk about race is different in every country. That's context. Social context, historical context, linguistic context. To pretend it isn't relevant or important is ridiculous.

 


So, would your South American mother come to England and start referring to black people as negrito? To their faces? During an argument? Serious question.

 

Edit: There’s a lot of social, historical and linguistic context surrounding race. Not all of it pleasant. There are some people in certain southern states in the US who’d tell you it’s their culture and heritage too. Might even wave a flag professing it. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Chris said:


So, would your South American mother come to England and start referring to black people as negrito? To their faces? During an argument? Serious question. 

She lives in the UK now, has done for 45 years. But in the first year or two, when she was relatively young, yes, possibly. She wouldn't have known why it wouldn't be appropriate. It would have been no different to her referring to the colour of someone's hair. 

 

It's worth noting that, and this obviously is only generally speaking, South Americans, and people from Spain, and probably most of Southern Europe, are considerably more direct when speaking. My point is that it isn't just colour of skin that isn't deemed taboo/rude/much worse to refer to. It's obviously considerably less serious, but nevertheless deemed quite rude in the UK and other parts of Northern Europe, to refer to someone's weight. Yet, calling someone fat, or skinny, is perfectly normal in South American or Spain. In fact, these are often nicknames. People will refer to their partner as gordo/gordito. 

 

A friend of my girlfriend's is actually known as Negro. Simply because he's a very dark skinned caucasian.

 

For me, Suarez was guilty of ignorance. Something that a not inconsiderable number of Brits abroad could be accused of. In the "heat of battle" the chances of this ignorance being displayed almost certainly increases. I wouldn't have had a problem with him being punished. Raising awareness of what is and isn't acceptable culturally here, whilst taking into account what is and isn't acceptable in his own culture, would have been a good thing. But seeing the fucking Daily Mail and that rag, two consistently, institutionally, hatefully, racist publications labelling him a racist was absurd and disgraceful.

 

For me, racism is about power. It's for this reason that I find a panel of white, British, middle aged, rich men, that have almost certainly benefited historically from slavery, determining whether or not a young Uruguayan footballer said something racist, quite galling.

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/02/2020 at 08:28, dave u said:

The club's social media wished McManaman happy birthday today. 

 

It's just plain weird the way they act as though Owen never played for us. 

Isn't Owen employed as a club ambassador of some kind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

She lives in the UK now, has done for 45 years. But in the first year or two, when she was relatively young, yes, possibly. She wouldn't have known why it wouldn't be appropriate. It would have been no different to her referring to the colour of someone's hair. 

 

It's worth noting that, and this obviously is only generally speaking, South Americans, and people from Spain, and probably most of Southern Europe, are considerably more direct when speaking. My point is that it isn't just colour of skin that isn't deemed taboo/rude/much worse to refer to. It's obviously considerably less serious, but nevertheless deemed quite rude in the UK and other parts of Northern Europe, to refer to someone's weight. Yet, calling someone fat, or skinny, is perfectly normal in South American or Spain. In fact, these are often nicknames. People will refer to their partner as gordo/gordito. 

 

A friend of my girlfriend's is actually known as Negro. Simply because he's a very dark skinned caucasian.

 

For me, Suarez was guilty of ignorance. Something that a not inconsiderable number of Brits abroad could be accused of. In the "heat of battle" the chances of this ignorance being displayed almost certainly increases. I wouldn't have had a problem with him being punished. Raising awareness of what is and isn't acceptable culturally here, whilst taking into account what is and isn't acceptable in his own culture, would have been a good thing. But seeing the fucking Daily Mail and that rag, two consistently, institutionally, hatefully, racist publications labelling him a racist was absurd and disgraceful.

 

For me, racism is about power. It's for this reason that I find a panel of white, British, middle aged, rich men, that have almost certainly benefited historically from slavery, determining whether or not a young Uruguayan footballer said something racist, quite galling.

 

 

You make your points really well and convincingly. I guess what it comes down to is whether you believe his only crime is ignorance. I struggle with that given his career-long habit of using every possible despicable means of gaining an advantage on an opponent and have that as my frame of reference. Not a part of me thinks he's above that kind of malice. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a sentimental mug and would be no good making decisions about former players. I still have love for Owen, Torres, Suarez and Coutinho and wanted them back. For some reason I've almost forgotten Mascherano played for us, all I really remember is the song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Chris said:

 

You make your points really well and convincingly. I guess what it comes down to is whether you believe his only crime is ignorance. I struggle with that given his career-long habit of using every possible despicable means of gaining an advantage on an opponent and have that as my frame of reference. Not a part of me thinks he's above that kind of malice. 

 

If you want to judge the Evra/Sarez incident and take as evidence  "..his career-long habit of using ....etc " I guess that's up to you.

 

You could, if you wanted to, read the FA verdict, although it's proably pointless as you've already made upp ypur mind.

 

There are several posteres on here who actually did read the kangaroo stuff from FA. To us you look mostly like a prejudiced tit. A pity as you views regarding Owen are sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JustTosh said:

If you want to judge the Evra/Sarez incident and take as evidence  "..his career-long habit of using ....etc " I guess that's up to you.

 

You could, if you wanted to, read the FA verdict, although it's proably pointless as you've already made upp ypur mind.

 

There are several posteres on here who actually did read the kangaroo stuff from FA. To us you look mostly like a prejudiced tit. A pity as you views regarding Owen are sound.

 

Did read it. Backed him to the hilt at the time. Have realised I was wrong to since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His own analogy was that he went off to have an affair.

 

And it wasn't just the FACT that he did it, it was the WAY he did it.

 

 

BTW - I don't hate him. I just don't hold him in the esteem that I hold Carra et al.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...