Jump to content
tlw content
tlw content

Rodgers slams England over Sturridge treatment

Brendan Rodgers has spoken in greater detail about why he feels Daniel Sturridge’s injury - sustained on international duty with England - could have been avoided.

 

A clearly irritated Rodgers claims that Sturridge was injured on what would usually have been a “rest day” had the striker been with his club rather than his country. Furthermore, not only was Sturridge training on that day (Friday), he was playing a full intensity 11 a side game less than 48 hours after playing the full ninety minutes of England’s 1-0 win over Norway on Wednesday night.

 

You don’t need a sports science degree to know that a player with a history of muscular problems should not be overworked like that.

 

And as if that wasn’t bad enough, Rodgers also revealed that Sturridge warned the England staff he was at risk of being injured if his specialist training routine was disrupted. Those warnings were ignored, and lo and behold Sturridge was injured. Still, he’s due back for England’s next international, so no harm done eh Roy?

 

These are quotes from Rodgers in today’s Daily Telegraph

 

“From images I’ve seen Daniel’s actually sprinted with the ball nearly 50 yards, three-quarters of the pitch, to shoot and that’s when he pulls up. That’s where the issues are. We’re obviously disappointed because we feel it was an injury which could have been prevented.

 

“Here we look at the individual player. Think of Daniel’s week. He plays a high-level game at Tottenham on Sunday, goes away and meets up with the [England] squad on Monday. I believe on the Tuesday they did a session which he was involved in. Then he played a second game on the Wednesday. On the Friday it would be an active recovery for us. After the game, 48 hours later, is critical for recovery.

 

“I think clubs work differently at times to international teams. It’s more the recovery strategy. When we look at our players here, we look at them individually in terms of what their needs are. Fast players would have a second day’s recovery, while other players can work on that day. When you are that type of quick player like Daniel Sturridge, Raheem Sterling and boys like Danny Welbeck, you need to recover them. Sturridge has worked so hard over pre-season and looked very fit and strong in our last game against Tottenham."

 

Asked if the England team were made aware of Sturridge’s particular training programme, Rodgers said:

 

“Absolutely. The players go there and tell the associations how they work. Of course it’s always up to the manager of the association. And on that second day they can do tactical work but for us and the methods of how we work, that can only be low to moderate intensity in small spaces, or you get injuries.

 

“I have good relations with Roy [Hodgson]. We speak, I give him the run-down on all our young players, their positioning, and all that. I’m one who is very pro the national teams. I am an Irishman and I actually want to help England. The core of our team is based around that.

 

"Look at Jordan Henderson the other night, playing in a diamond and he’s very fluid because he knows how to work it. Look at Raheem, he knows how to work it. We want to help them but this doesn’t help them and certainly doesn’t help us, especially when they know how we work.”

 

The worst part of it all is that there is absolutely nothing to prevent this happening again next time. Liverpool’s players have their own individually tailored training programmes but when they go and join up with their countries (not just England) that goes out of the window.

 

It seems farcical that clubs pay these players such vast amounts of money but have no control over what happens when they join up with their countries.If Roy Hodgson wants to “test a player’s resolve” by making him play when he’s injured, there’s nothing in place to stop him. If he wants to dismiss the advice of Liverpool’s medical people and ignore the concerns of a player who knows his own body much better than the England staff could possibly do, there’s nothing to stop him.

 

This isn't the first time it's happened, and you can be sure it won't be the last either.

User Feedback

Recommended Comments



Sterling looks shattered after last season and then the world cup and then this season and then international friendlies. It looks like he needs a month off sat on a beach. 

 

But as other people have said, players like and want to play for their country and you can't stop them.

 

Also, I hope we're not pinning all our season's hopes on an injury prone striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love when people say "international level" - how often does a player actually play a good country, it's always fucking Fred the bricklayer.  Being "international class" is a myth, it's a terrible level of football and I fucking hate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three games under Roy Hodgson is no preparation for, or sign of, anything. 

 

It wasn't a "wake up" call for anyone other than the deluded fucking mongs of the English public who seemed to be oblivious to just how shit a manager Hodgson is.

 

International football, under Hodgson, or whoever the inevitably shit replacement will be in a few years, will have nothing but a negative effect on players like Sturridge and Sterling. Learning how to play a style of football that stopped being relevant 20 years ago, and picking up unnecessary injuries.

We agree on the tactical desert that has been England for years.

 

You are wrong on the benefits of international football for players.

 

Simply experiencing going to other countries and playing there, and testing yourself against players who you might not normally play against is vital career development. Henderson, Sterling and Sturridge have seen precious little football action abroad, they need it. This isn't about Hodgson. it is about experiencing playing against international opposition and measuring yourself, whatever the team does.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is, players like Sturridge, Lallana and Sterling have all said in the past how much they love playing for England.  I always get the impression Henderson has more of a Carragher mentality about England - Liverpool first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Owl - "Yeah I listened, but I didn't"

 

You may recall Rodgers' claim that Sturridge's injury was caused by England not following the same training programme he would have had at his club.

Hodgson responded to that, saying: "We always try to do that. The last thing you want is to get injuries in training, even more so as an international manager because you feel a responsibility to the clubs.

"People need to consider that we have such a shortage of time. On this particular occasion we had two days and two training sessions to try and hone a very different way of playing.

"If I'm going to be put under pressure as the England manager in future to give every player two days off every time they play, then we won't train at all quite frankly."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"If I'm going to be put under pressure as the England manager in future to give every player two days off every time they play, then we won't train at all quite frankly."

 

Probably would improve the side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Owl - "Yeah I listened, but I didn't"

 

You may recall Rodgers' claim that Sturridge's injury was caused by England not following the same training programme he would have had at his club.

Hodgson responded to that, saying: "We always try to do that. The last thing you want is to get injuries in training, even more so as an international manager because you feel a responsibility to the clubs.

"People need to consider that we have such a shortage of time. On this particular occasion we had two days and two training sessions to try and hone a very different way of playing.

"If I'm going to be put under pressure as the England manager in future to give every player two days off every time they play, then we won't train at all quite frankly."

 

I really really hate him. Him and every d*ckhead up and down the country who thinks he's any good as a manager. What a fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You may recall Rodgers' claim that Sturridge's injury was caused by England not following the same training programme he would have had at his club.

Hodgson responded to that, saying: "We always try to do that. The last thing you want is to get injuries in training, even more so as an international manager because you feel a responsibility to the clubs.

"People need to consider that we have such a shortage of time. On this particular occasion we had two days and two training sessions to try and hone a very different way of playing.

"If I'm going to be put under pressure as the England manager in future to give every player two days off every time they play, then we won't train at all quite frankly."

 

Cunt Hodgson playing the victim card.  The press will support him and we will be made out to be the villains by blaming our poor form on Ingurland.

 

How he gets away with it is un fucking believable, Every other sap that's taken on the role and done much better than the Owl would have been all over the back pages with donkey ears or a turnip tacked on by now. Every time I see him it just brings to mind the story of the Emperors new clothes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One despicable twat.

 

How does such an incompetent and palpably talentless individual survive in his chosen profession? How on Earth can he constantly impress the likes of Al Fayed, Purslow and Greg Dyke with his football CV, and..................... Oh! Now I see.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope Welbeck scores two hattricks and Studge becomes third choice for England.

 

Yep. I'll take that

 

Edit : I just saw his interview on SSN re Sturridge situation.  It's never his fault is it?  The fucking owl faced wanker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand his argument. He basically says that he understands that players need days off to recover properly, and then he tries to win the argument against himself by then saying that he only had two days between games to prepare and so they had to train?

 

How about stick them in a classroom Roy and talk tactics? They already know how to play football, you just need to tell them how to play together, and you can do that on paper.

 

Tawny Roy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What he's basically admitted to there is that he trains every player the same. He is incapable of seeing that certain players need light training because of their injury proneness and others need heavier workloads to stay sharp, he doesn't understand the individualism of training footballers and he's the England Manager, the mind boggles.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If I'm going to be put under pressure as the England manager in future to give every player two days off every time they play, then we won't train at all quite frankly."

 

Anyone else put on the Roy voice in their head when reading that last bit?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roy Hodgson says he won’t be dictated to by Brendan Rodgers
• England coach leaves Daniel Sturridge out of Euro squad
• ‘If I have to give players two days off we won’t train at all’
Roy-Hodgson-009.jpgRoy Hodgson denied Brendan Rodgers' claim that England's training routines were to blame for Daniel Sturridge's thigh injury. Photograph: Tony O'Brien/Action Images

Roy Hodgson has described as “dangerous” the complaint from Brendan Rodgers that England’s training routines were to blame for Daniel Sturridge’s thigh injury, describing it as untrue and also reminding the Liverpool manager that he has no right to think he can unduly influence his selections for the national team.

 

 

 

 

I HATE Roy Hodgson.

 

I HATE Daniel Taylor.

 

Everything in this article makes me want to throttle anybody associated with it.

 

The photograph of him looking "bullish".  The defiant stance.  The positioning of the media on the side of the useless no mark.  The attempt to create a goody and a baddie.  The understated authority of this clueless buffoon in bringing outlyers back into line.

 

Who is it for?  It reminds me of that quote from the ex-FA rep who spoke of putting Kenny in his place.

 

Come on Isis, do us all a favour - target Soho Square and let the rest of us get on with football.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this guy ever going to get a song (Sturridge) at Basel during half time, we spent the entire 15 minutes singing the fucking Colin Pascoe song, yet out leading striker, who has begged on twitter to have a song made for him doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...