Bob

Looks like you're doing a nice job. Are you putting heating in? And are you insulating the floor?

Actually, I take that back. It was bloody delicious.

I'm eating it, so I should probably share it. Not great.

The cattle grid is just out of shot

French stick and child's sick. Noice.

Thing is, compared to some of what we've seen... it was. At least they remembered to look at everything. At least they checked what the decision was supposed to be for. At least they remembered to look at all the things they said they wanted to look at. It's still utter shit, but we've seen far worse from them.

Thing is, compared to some of what we've seen... it was. At least they remembered to look at everything. At least they checked what the decision was supposed to be for. At least they remembered to look at all the things they said they wanted to look at. It's still utter shit, but we've seen far worse from them.

Here we go now. It's offside. We know itsnoffside. It's clear to anyone who has watched footy. Yet still, 2 minutes gone

That Times article, like so much of this, just fundamentally misses the point in regard to the issues most fans have with VAR. It's not about the accuracy. It's not about the communicating. It's about the impact it has on your ability to watch and enjoy a game of footy, and the inconsistency by which that impact actually makes things any better anyway. A decision being "correct" isn't worth the 3-5 minute delay, punctuation of joy and all that other stuff unless the original decision was significantly wrong to begin with. If it is marginally wrong, the benefit doesn't outweigh the impact and if it's significantly wrong it shouldn't take the time it always does to correct it, and it shouldn't be hit and miss whether something marginally wrong will be righted anyhow.

Looks great.

That's getting negged for naming what is comfortably their worst song.

I didn't see it live and have only watched the replay once or twice but the cov player was stood still and didn't react to the pass straight away, whereas the defender was running back towards goal so that's why he very quickly looks onside in that video. For my money, he looked 'level' but that's not a thing anymore since the shit lines came in to spoil everything to make nerds and Internet twats happy, so he's either just on or just off and it turns out on this one roll of the dice he's just off.

Gary Wilson always comes across as a right twat to me.

Enjoyed the bit where he spent 20 seconds making a point while gesticulating with his right hand so his mic was nowhere near his mouth. Without doubt the bit where he made the best points of the day, I'd wager.

That looks like it should cost less. Dunno about you but I'd like to hope the ingredients cost more than a fiver when I'm eating out.

Can't you tell me what he said?

Pork schnitzel from the fancy butchers in town, with potatoes bacon and leek (potatoes are undercooked in truth), peas and beetroot. Super

Only had tartare once - in a chic little bistro in Paris near Montmarte, where I made a twat of myself walking in and pater poured a glass of red wine down my birds white dress before leaving - and it was fucking delicious. Asian inspired from memory, with sesame and other things.

Needs bird's-eye potato waffles

Is there a pork pie on your plate there Baz?

You dont always, but you're talking sense here. Playing well and getting some mojo back here is more important than the result.

Wonderful.

I just clicked through and thought the same. Talented guy.

We desperately need to play well. We need to look like a team that can win by being good cause I'm not sure we currently believe we can win by just keeping going. Have to give it a right go, and have to do that with a strong team. If we play well but it's mostly reserves do the first teamers get the belief? I don't think so. Strong team. Play well. See what happens.

Like his team.