The Guest

This is literally the most boring argument ever. If you don't finish fourth you are restricting yourself to not being able to win the league or champions league the following season. If you don't finish in the top four you can't sign the players to challenge and your current players aren't competing at the highest level to improve. To the people who chose winning those cups the question should be how many seasons would you choose winning those two cups before you think fourth would become more important. 1, 2 3 or more? It's a pointless argument but if you want the club to be competitive you need to finish in the champions league places. End of.

Are you absolutely fucking mental? Seriously you must be. I like the way you skim over the Crouch money not forthcoming completely ignoring the fact of why we were fucking selling him in the first place. After a year of basically not playing him and hardly even putting him on the bench, instead putting Voronin on and if he did appear on the bench bringing Voronin on instead. Even though Voronin is literally one of the worst footballers to have ever played for us. Then laughably at the end of the season saying we had to let Crouch go because he wants to play every week. Again talking to the fans as if they are dickheads and some of them fucking lapped it up as usual. If Crouch would have been getting picked ahead of Voronin, which he should have been anyway, he quite clearly would have been happy to stay. He should have been starting nearly every game with Torres anyway. He would probably still be here now and doing a good enough job for us.

He's a fucking disgrace. He runs an organisation that needs 4 months to count up a few hundred votes. It's fucking laughable. It's makes the PFA award carry no weight whatsoever. I reckon a football player could shoot someone live on television and he would defend it.

If dragging us into the 21st century is having one person control absolutely everything from picking the first team to who cleans the toilets, yet having absolutely no accountability for any of it is dragging us back into the 21st century then yes let's get Rafa back. We started this season with the chance of winning two trophies and we can still do that. Is that good enough long term? No. Is that Kenny's fault? No. I don't think any manager would have us in the top four at the moment from when Rafa left including Rafa. We were in such a bad state down to the owners and Benitez. Footballing wise he left us in a fucking shocking state. It's funny how quickly people forget how bad we were that season. Imagine if we were getting beat like we are now but instead of throwing Downing Bellamy and Shelvey on, Rafa would have took off Carroll, Suarez and Maxi and threw on Caotes, Carra and Kelly on. He had the lost the plot that much. The funny thing was you still had gobshites lapping these decisions up. It just simply comes down to whether you believe we are making progress and will we improve next season. At the moment there is a good case for whether we are or aren't. If Kenny did go, bringing Benitez back would make spending £35m on Andy Carroll look like a masterstroke. I think the club would fall to bits. I believe we are actually playing decent football and have simply been unlucky. I think it would be a bad idea to let Kenny go now. It can only go so long with playing the way we are before results start to consistently go our way. If we were playing as bad as we were in Benitez's last season and the results were also the way they are then I think I may start leaning the other way.

Ye just spotted it, closed yesterday I think. Nice one for going to anyway!

Ennis is a fucking winner like. She trains with her sometimes. When she was about 16 she went to train at Loughborough with some other athletes. She come back and was saying some tall black guy called Daley was training them all day. It me feel old that she didn't have a clue who he was. She actually beat Ennis in a five event competition a few weeks ago. She has been nominated for European athlete of the month for March. Here's the link if anyone can be arsed voting for a fellow scouser. UKA Vote for European Athlete of the Month for March

Keep an eye out for my cousin Katarina Thompson. She's basically Jessica Ennis' understudy in the heptaphlon. She's only young. We are hoping she is going to cause a bit of a shock when she gets there.

I just wanted to share this with as many people as possible as I think it's fucking genius.

My mate was in his with his bird and wanted to put a film on. When they put it on the telly it was coming on upside down for some reason. She asked him, being deadly serious, "did you put the DVD in the right way up?"

Sorry it's looks like I'm as shit at explaining myself as SD is then. Poeple like that need to go on a register that is available to women. The women do not bring it on themselves. They are not the fault of some horrible scumbag thinking it is okay to hit women. SD's comment was that you wonder why women put themselves into these situations. He got jumped on for it. I was trying to explain what I think he meant. There are plenty of decent men. Why get with the bad ones when it is surely more likely that this type of thing could happen? I don't really understand what you are trying to say with the rest of your post.

As much as SD's right wing political views annoy the fuck out of me here I think you can see what he is saying if you don't just jump down his throat. Nobody knows the story behind their relationship and nobody believes for one second that she in anyway was at fault or brought any of it on herself. You do, however, get girls who love a bad boy. If you don't know these type of girls then you don't know many girls. They attach themselves to drug dealers, hard cases and general nutters. They do it because of the attention and the fact their fella intimidates people. We all know this type or are aware of this type of person. When/If one of these people, who already come from a violent past, eventually bully or abuse their girlfriend are you surprised? They are obviously not the only type of person to abuse women. This case could easily be the girl not realising what the guy was like before it become an impossible situation to get out of. I think what SD is saying is, after one of the posters above pointed out this guy has been in and out of jail for years, why did she get with him the first place? He's probably assuming she wasn't with him from the age of 16 or something before he had been to prison. She may have been. It's a fucking tragedy either way and he should be in prison for a long time. Hopefully it won't be your typical shit house sentence.

Drogba of old that. They are going to struggle to replace him. Everyone hates him but he's been a fucking monster of a player for them over the years.

Adebayor's touch and movement has been top class so far. He's a nightmare to play against when he is on song.

What was Gallas up to then the fucking stupid cunt. Accident waiting to happen him.

Ye I don't like all that shit myself. Plenty of cockneys from both teams will have observed that silence and booed when it was cut short.

I only found out about the Han shoots first thing a few years ago. I uses think to myself how the fuck did greedo miss. When I found out I felt like I'd been raped. It's those small things that people watching miss out. Han shooting first is such a vital thing when I think about it now. It shows he was cut throat and makes his changing is more important. Safe to say I went on a Wikipedia binge. There's whole pages set up about all the minor things that have been changed on various releases down the years. This did lead me on to reading the books though so I'm glad for that. Grand Admiral Thrawn is a fucking brilliant character and those books would have been great as films. I've been reading I, Jedi which is supposed to be the best book but it's just been a let down for me and I've read all the xwing series to prepare me for it too. Has anyone else read many of the books?

He's morally void so will probably struggle to answer.

What's not to like?

I remember my economics teacher telling us there were two trains of thought in the early years of the two party's. For society to work one of two things has to happen. You either tax the wealthy more to pay for the national services for everyone to give more equal opportunities and make the country at better place or you don't tax the wealthy as much and rely on philanthropists to even things up by donating money to things eg charities and schools which would make the country better place. Both parties, however, did agree that a progressive tax system is the only fair system to use. As time has gone on and people have taken less interest in politics nobody seems to understand this. The tax system has become less and less progressive. You now even get people who are against it just because they hate tax and don't understand the benefits of it. It's apathy that's killing the economy. It comes down to two things. Left-wing doesn't work because of inefficiencies. Right-wing doesn't work because of lack of regulation. The answer means it should be somewhere in the middle. The problem at the moment is that when something happens that's an innefficiency problem (ie left wing) the politics swings more right wing. When the problem is a lack of regulation (ie right wing) the politics swing more right wing. It's a big con. There is no left wing any more which is what is needed to correct the economy at the moment. Not just letting things carry on the same way but tax the poorer/middle a bit more. It's fucking joke. The fact you have got whoppers like this strontium dog who can sit there and think what the conservatives are doing is morally right is fucking disgusting. Just hold your hands up and say "you know what, it makes me personally better off so I am happy and I don't give a shit about everyone else." At least that's honest. Don't sit there and make out what they are doing is right because it isn't.

So's your ma lad.

He understands politics very well I think everyone can see that. It's what makes his views even more disgusting.

The Daily Mail is probably left wing to that guy.

The Hunger Games is not even worth a score it's that bad. The first hour or what felt like a week is unbelievably boring. It's trying to set the scene and characters but does this as badly as I have ever seen a film do. The rest of the film is then trying to be an action film without showing any action probably due to the certificate. There are so many bits in it when I was thinking this is fucking awful. Without giving anything away (which I probably should to discourage anyone from spending any money on this truly awful film) the most laughable bit was when there is four of them chasing one character. One of these four characters is not really friends with the rest and the rest mention killing him. They decide not to because they need him to search for another character. They then find the one they are chasing after, who goes up a tree and do you know what they all do? They fucking GO TO SLEEP! Seriously, in a warzone, where only the winner survives. All these cut throat kids killing people without a second thought, GO TO FUCKING SLEEP. It's insulting. There are inumerable incidents like this throughout the film. To add to this acting level of the main characters is woeful as well.

All this comes down to, as it always does with stuff like this, is that someone is trying to be the first to tell everyone something so they can say they knew first. It's fucking embarrassing, especially considering that idiot is saying he's 37. People like that are just desperate for attention and for everyone to respect them and their opinion. Its no surprise that this shit is coming from RAWK as its full of dickheads like that. If you heard something is happening why would you go on an Internet board and post that you know something but you can't say what for anything other than a load of attention off people it's fucking cringeworthy. Just the phrase ITK goes through me.

Oh don't get me wrong the start to Downing and Carroll's Liverpool careers is nothing short of woeful. We didn't sign Stuart Downing because he heads a good corner away though or because he bully defenders and holds the ball up well. We signed him because he plays on the wing and makes chances and he made a fucking bucket load of assists at villa last season. We also didn't sign Andy Carroll because hes the next Aguero and does a nice back heel either. We signed him because aerially he was showing to be one of the best big men in the premier league. He won headers in the box resulting in a goal for him or a team mate plenty of times at Newcastle. For whatever reason they both haven't performed this season but bringing him off the bench and removing the only proper winger we own is a fucking stupid decision in anyone's book. If you disagree with me then fine but don't start chatting absolute bollocks to me to try and look clever and then respond like that when you have been had off. Andy Carroll has went hiding in a lot of games this season but on occasion has attacked the ball in the box from crosses. He's hit the bar on at least one occassion and has headed just over on others. Not good enough yes; but unlucky as well. This is the only part of his game that has made him look, on occasion, like a professional footballer. If you are going to bring him off the bench to try and win the game why are we nullifying his only real strength by taking off a winger? Especially when the absolute crab that is dirk Kuyt is still on the pitch. That comment about people who actually watch the games doesn't help you either. Instead of having your head inside your own arse why don't you actually consider what people are saying might be true instead of trying to luck smart all the time. You might realise people might actually start to respect your opinion rather than dismiss it as typical code bollocks as seems to happen on here.