Nelly-Szoboszlai

It's a terrible game so far. Both teams are very, very average. Plus, I've bet on Novakovic to score first and he looks like he's doing his best impersonation of a white Michael Ricketts.

I'd jizz on her bum hole....Eeeeeeeeeeeh, you feltcher!

For tomorrow: Slovenia to win to nil - 15/8. Line ups permitting: Novakovic (Slovenia) first goal - 5/1. Vidic (Serbia) first goal 33/1 and anytime at 12/1. Schweinsteiger (Germany) first goal 12/1.

Katy Perry has boss tits. That is all.

Just opened an account with 888sport.com. No lose offer on first bet up to max of £20. Was only going to deposit £15, but did £30 instead and lashed £15 no lose bet on an outside bet for first goal in the Argies game: Taye Tiawo: Left back for Nigeria. Cannonball of a left foot. Takes free kicks. Can see it being a physical game with lots of free kicks. Factor in the new ball. Worth a little dabble, especially with nothing to lose, literally. My other £15 notes went on: £10 on Higuain first goal at 4's. £2 on Higuain 2-0 Scorecast at 25's £2 on Danny Shittu first card at 10's £1 on Method of first goal - Penalty at 10's. Only time will tell....(but quite fancy the Taiwo bet)

- £50 on Algeria to finish bottom of their group at 5/6. - £10 Spain outright winners at 4/1. - £2.50 e/w Italy outright winners at 16/1. - £10 David Villa top goal scorer at 8/1 - £ 2.50 e/w top goal scorer on the following: Antonio Di Natale @ 66/1 Peter Crouch @ 33/1 Humberto Suazo @ 125/1 Will do a few little bets in the individual games too.

Google away, sunshine. I'm not doing all the hard work for you.

Was Heskey's bird very tall, or were the rest of the WAG's very short. She towered above them. She's lovely looking, Heskey's bird, and seems quite down to earth as well. Star of that programme though was Dave Lamb. Some of his lines tonight were genuinely laugh out loud moments. Tres Bon, Love. Squeak, squeak, squeak, squeak. etc etc etc

^ This.

Are you John Prescott?

No kids of my own yet, but I became an uncle on Monday. I wasn't fussed in the build up, but i'm now besotted with my little niece. Weird sense of being over-protective already. Dead proud too. So can't begin to imagine how proud you feel as a dad, Elite. Congratulations.

That Ife is boss. Fittest in there.

I don't want Hodgson because he looks like the dead body from The Goonies who the Fratelli's murdered, the one who Chunk get's stuck in the walk in fridge/car boot with.

Somebody will score an unquantified amount of goals for us next season, a certain other player will set some of these goals up. This will lead to us finishing somewhere between 1st and 20th in the table. We'll play in red. We'll sell some players and buy a few others. People will moan. Some people won't. The atmosphere at Anfield will still be shit. Nelly-Torres in right again shocker.

No it doesn't. It was an attempt at a bit of light-heartedness. Lighten up! I was also trying to say that Dalglish was not an option as a long term manager. I think it would be an unwise move all round, even to bring Dalglish in on an interim basis. It smacks of heart ruling head and at the current time and with the current state of the club, we can't afford to let that happen. This decision of who to appoint as the next manager could be make or break. Don't see the point in picking a manager to do the job for one or two seasons as some are suggesting for Dalglish and then getting somebody else in to start all over again. Potential to be disruptive. Fine, if a sale goes through and the new owners want to bring in their own manager, so be it. It won't have that much of an impact on a potential buyers decision to buy us as, if they have decent solicitors, they would've conducted a thorough due diligence process before purchasing and would be fully aware of their potential liabilities if they sacked the manager in place. I'm still going for Pellegrini - strike while the iron is hot.

Dalglish is a Liverpool legend and I don't want him to take the job as I reckon we are in for a couple of difficult seasons, so he could lose that legendary status amongst some of our more fickle fans. Anyway, he's a non-starter in my opinion for the very fact that him and Purslow (why?) have been handed the task of picking the new manager. I can't see the process allowing Dalglish to be a candidate. Surely he has already written himself out by being involved in this process? How would it work? CP: O'Neill? Has done okay for Villa? KD. Nah, what about me? CP: Rijkaard? He got Barca playing some lovely football? KD: nah, what about me? CP: Come on Kenny, we're meant to be picking a new manager here, What about Hiddink? Always plays good attacking football. KD: Nah, what about me? Seriously, for me I'd go for Pellegrini. Granted, back to the hilt financially this season at Madrid, but he had them playing some great football. He was the same for Villarreal too. Lovely quick, on the floor, passing and attacking game. So, I'd consider him and maybe a couple of lesser yet up and coming managers i'd consider to are: Owen Coyle (don't laugh) Michel (Current Getafe manager) MIchael Laudrup.

Even her name is sexy....not to mention her boss tits and lovely round ass!

I'd make a deposit in her bank. I wouldn't lose interest when I withdraw either.

Now watching This Week - Linda Papadopolous (the psychologist). WOW! Hot and amazing boobage.

To the law graduate (that's if you pass! :-) ) if you haven't already, get some work experience in a law firm. It's absolutely vital if you want to try and get a training contract/pupilage. I got a high 2:1 degree and a distinction in my LPC and it was a real struggle to try and get a training contract after that due to lack of experience. Seriously, academic ability helps, but I'd say work experience is possible even more beneficial. I didn't get one in the end. Went down the graduate recruitment scheme and am now earning a lot more than I would if I was doing a training contract, for a lot less hours and stress!

Again, another nonsense post. Obviously Hillsborough and Heysel are darker days, but tell me when the club has been in such a bad state off the pitch as it is now? Rafa has to take some degree of blame for what's going on on the pitch, but again, see my previous post, and whats happening off the pitch has had an obvious impact of what's going on on the pitch. Why have Tottenham and Man City leaped above us this season? One main reason is MONEY. I'm guessing that i've been relatively overboard by your standards in my previous post on this topic (if you care to read it). But, seriously, can you see somebody like Hodgson, O'Neill, Hughes or (pains me to say it) even Dalglish doing a better job than Rafa? People are paying far too much attention to last season which was bad. If the board are saying that there is likely to be money for players why not back Rafa for one season, preferably this season just gone, when he had come so close to winning the league last season? We now have absolutely nobody with any semblance of footballing knowledge at the helm of our club. Rafa was a fetter to their ability to really fuck us up. Now he's gone, I really fear for our future. If somebody makes big bids for our players, I can see them leaving as the decision to sell will be made purely on financial and business considerations at the current juncture, and footballing reasons will be secondary. And for the record I am a season ticket holder and have been for the past 8 seasons and have been a regular match goer since the age of 6 - my first game was Liverpool v Birmingham for the record, with David Seaman in goal for Brum

The latter YEARS? Can't agree with that. The last year, maybe, but the previous season was one of the most exciting times to be a Liverpool fan in a long time. A genuine title challenge, a European Cup semi-final, playing good, attacking football, smashing teams, decent teams at that like Villa, United, Real Madrid and scoring 4 or 5 goals in the process. Would hardly count that as dismal. Don't let the poor last season cloud your judgement. Onwards and upwards? Really? Fair enough, sack a good manager who until last season has pretty much consistently qualified for the Champions League and replace him with a better manager. However, the state of the club means we will not attract a real top name manager so it's going to be a case of replacing like for like or even for a worse manager. Granted, apart from one season, Rafa hasn't really delivered what most fans want, which is a genuine title challenge. Sadly, quite a lot of that is down to the financial power of our rivals, who can shell out money left, right and centre, whereas Benitez was on a tight budget, making his signing more open to scrutiny. I mean, look at United. They've just spent £8m on a relatively unknown Mexican striker, who has the POTENTIAL to be good. Benitez wasn't afforded this luxury. Pretty much every signing he made had to be good. He couldn't gamble on £8m players with potential. He was having to pay £8m (if he was lucky) for first team players. So, in summary, look at the bigger picture before saying that Rafa leaving is a good thing. Anyway, if someone like Martin O'Neill or Roy Hodgson equals onwards and upwards to some people (as that's the only calibre of manager I genuinely believe we'll be able to attract) then so be it.

So Israel are right in this. Surely that makes the people who have come out and condemned these murderous actions liars. For example, that renowned lying bastard, Archbishop Desmond Tutu. You couldn't make the Israeli version of events up!...........Unless your name is Mark Regev or Lipi Zivni. I'm watching the coverage on Press TV (Sky 515) for a more balanced point of view than Sky, CNN etc. Some of the experts are getting rather passionate about what has happened.

Yes. Agreed. However, I can't see the Americans being absolved of any causative effect in this. They've already shown historically a complete disregard to civilians in armed conflict - Hiroshima, Vietnam. Now add Fallujah to the list.

I'm not sure on the exact position, but it looks like the US will never be brought to task for their part in this. Apparently, the use of white phosphorus is illegal under international law only if it is used as an offensive weapon. Obviously, the yanks will hide behind the "we only used at as an illuminative device to flash out the insurgents, Siree Bob" argument. Also, would the use of white phosphorus as a weapon would constitute a war crime? Would such a war crime be judged and subsequently punished by the International Criminal Court? It just so happens that the US boycotts this court and therefore would not recognise it's jurisdiction. Shocking.