Jack the Sipper

I was thinking more on this forum, but in the case of Corbyn, as you know, the guy was filmed calling Hamas his friends, and only recently, couldn't bring himself to call them terrorists in an interview. And while I don't think he is, he kind of leaves himself open to those accusations, which he seems to belatedly recognise when he rows back on those remarks. But back to my question, I would like to know why this complaint of a lack of nuance from Arnie seems to be directed in one direction.

Who says anyone who believes these things is a terrorist sympathiser? I'll say right now though, that anyone who thinks the Houthis are a great bunch of lads is a massive cunt in my book. And, on the question of nuance, what do you make of the propaganda and outrageous remarks that the openly racist @planetorigi has been spouting relentlessly in this thread? Nuanced? What, in particular, did you make of that same cunt saying only yesterday in this thread that I'm "supporting and enabling the actual slaughter of babies" because I *checks notes* support the Labour party. Nuanced? What am I to make of the fact that you haven't called him out?

Ah, you got me! Yeah, hands up, I do love the slaughter of babies.

Carnegie? He's just another dirty white western bastard that should've been beheaded at birth.

What sympathy and concern would that be then?

Who would that be then, the Labour party? I dread to think what kind of medieval, ultra conservative, blood-thirsty mobs have got your backing, you filthy fundamentalist. And between the two of us, only one's been making openly racist comments on this forum, on this thread even, and it ain't me.

I hurt you bad, didn't I.

You started calling non-Jews rats now? Anyway, it's great to see I've rattled your cage. Speaking of cages, stick around and, if you're a good little extremist, I might stick up the video of that poor bastard who was burned alive in a cage by your people at ISIS. First wank of the day material right there.

And there was me thinking he was ManeMan or Hades. Wor Hamas.

Last Christmas the Arse were on top, but the very next game they gave it away.

I've got no problem with female pundits in football as a principle. Some are decent and knowledgeable, like Alex Scott, whilst some male pundits and commentators are so thick, so ill-informed, so biased, that you know the only reason they're there is because of their name. Is there anyone out there that doesn't throw shit at the screen when Danny Murphy's monotoning his way through a game? I think reducing the debate about quality/token pundits to a male/female one is missing the point. That said, there's that one female commentator, don't know her name, who screeches her way through a match, with the most banal comments shouted through a rolled-up newspaper, that I really can't be doing with.

The Torygraph saying today that the 'battleground' at the next election will be on taxes. No doubt that inheritance tax cut, defending the biggest tax burden in peacetime history, and promising to pay for tax cuts for well-off people by further cutting budgets to starved public services will be to be a big winner. Last month they were saying the Tories would take the fight to Labour on immigration. Last week they were saying that Sunak would take on Starmer in a battle of the personalities. Real fucking embarrassment of riches that the Tories have got up their sleeves. With the emphasis on 'embarrassment'.

Since I made that post above I've been regularly putting more money into Bitcoin and Ethereum (more so Bitcoin) and sold the other coins at a small profit. I'm currently up over 70% in all. I would be up over 165% had I lumped it all on Bitcoin at the time I made the post above. I could listen to the sceptics that think it's all a con for idiots, pull out now and think myself lucky, but I'm going to put another few hundred in next week, hopefully catch the ETF and halving wave, then cash out some profits.

Probably jinxing it here, but I'm quietly optimistic here. Under Klopp we've tended to struggled more against sides that play ten behind the ball (see last Sunday). The Arse, all credit to them, just aren't set up like that.

Why gave gone the Man U route of listing players by their numbers, not their positions, like we used to?

Well, here's the first use of 'rats' from him in that thread. He goes on to use it a further four times over that day or so, yet despite you posting in that same thread dozens of times between him saying it, I don't see you pull him on it once. If you can show me otherwise then I'll apologise, no problem. Actually, looking at who did neg him and pull him up (including me, Captain Willard, Stronts, RedderLurtz) it seems eerily familiar to the list of people you've had serious arguments with on here in recent weeks. What to make of that. As for Rico, do you realise what a fucking clown you sound like here? You're forever banging on about how nasty and evil Tories are, and yet you class him, a Tory, as a mate. How the fuck does that work? Some major cognitive dissonance going on there! And I do remember you repping him on many occasions when he insulted people who expressed views that an actual leftist would have. Overall, your attitude towards him was totally sycophantic and pathetic, given your stated beliefs.

Swig, put down the bottle, take a deep breath and read the post again you short-legged, short-fused horrible little scrote. I didn't say you didn't care about football, I said you don't understand, or care to understand politics. Like the hooligan latches himself on to a club primarily to have a ruck, so you do with politics. You're a shitty little tribalist, a weak-minded twat that can't see past personalities. Thank fuck you weren't around in late 60s LA. Manson would've had you doing his work for him.

The fact that you still think 'leftist' is a slur speaks volumes for your lack of understanding of politics. You don't get it at all. Talking about Chelsea, you're like the political equivalent of a footie hooligan - doesn't really give a fuck about the game but just wants to be part of a firm and indulge in some aggro. It's notable that you launched a volley at me for calling socialists leftists, but had sweet fuck all to say to Planet Origi when he repeatedly called Jews 'rats' on the Israeli thread (interesting what else I found when I searched the thread for uses of that term...). Also notable that, when I and others were having it out with Rico, an actual right-winger, over his comments about trans people and Kyle Rittenhouse for example, you were patting him on the back and repping his insults in reply, like the submissive simpering little cunt who knows his place on here that you are underneath the bluster. So, take it from me, when I use the term 'leftist' I'm not directing it at you - to do so would imply you had some actual, sincere left-wing beliefs.

I voted for Labour under Corbyn and supported him on this forum when he was leader.

You're the biggest cunt on here by a fucking distance. And one last thing before I put you back in the bin, for all your ranting about Tories and their supporters, you used to simp and drool over Rico, probably the only poster that ever admitted to voting Tory on here, so you can take your fake outrage and bogus sanctimonious and stick it up your arse. Fucking fraud.

Like you don't already. You're the mad cunt that logs on to the Daily Mail so you can fume at the comments from the Tories. Weirdo.

Am I somehow responsible for what the Tories are up to, you thick melodramatic runt? Have I ever expressed support for them or anything theyve done, you feeble-minded fuck? I'm supporting the party and leader that's trying to get them out, which more than can be said for some of the two bob personality-led 'socialists' on here, that have had their heads wedged up Corbyns arse for years, and would rather see a Tory victory than a Labour one under Starmer. And what's wrong with 'leftists' as a description? I could say Corbynistas, which which be more accurate in most cases, because you're tribalists not ideologues but I'm too polite for that.

I guess anyone to the right of Mao is a Tory in your bleak, binary view of the world. Are the people who bang on about Starmer or who criticise Labour or Labour supporters like myself in the *checks notes* Tory Cabinet Thread Tories, 'cos that's definitely Tory supporting behaviour right there. Now I know it upsets confused arseholes like you, I'll talk about leftists and Starmer all the more.

The name of the Lib Dem candidate takes some beating, an ex copper called Savage Gunn.