That Times article, like so much of this, just fundamentally misses the point in regard to the issues most fans have with VAR.
It's not about the accuracy.
It's not about the communicating.
It's about the impact it has on your ability to watch and enjoy a game of footy, and the inconsistency by which that impact actually makes things any better anyway.
A decision being "correct" isn't worth the 3-5 minute delay, punctuation of joy and all that other stuff unless the original decision was significantly wrong to begin with.
If it is marginally wrong, the benefit doesn't outweigh the impact and if it's significantly wrong it shouldn't take the time it always does to correct it, and it shouldn't be hit and miss whether something marginally wrong will be righted anyhow.