Jump to content

TD_LFC

Members
  • Posts

    8,946
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TD_LFC

  1. What part of that suggests no signings given the same people are already saying that on the signing front we're targeting a centre back and wide player? it's the same dance every time where each article is taken in isolation and the ability combine and contextualise all the information seems to leaves people. Three of our biggest players are a year away from being able to leave on free transfers, if one or all decide not to sign then the club need to sell and get replacements which alters what you do with signings so of course that would be a priority, doesn't stop you doing the other work alongside though.
  2. intentionally setting out to injure players in the pursuit of goals doesn't endear him to people.
  3. This is the kind of radical thinking we want to see in politics, eliminate the drain on businesses and society brought about by maternity/paternity leave and increase the gestation period to 24-36 months so kids can be born straight into nursery and parents can continue to work.
  4. Elphicke needs to fuck off and go sit up in the gods with Bridgen and Galloway.
  5. Even if they went out on a limb and said no to a tv deal they'd still have to adopt it as it's a majority vote not opt out or opt in.
  6. It's pre-empting the inevitable new manager, mass turnover of players expectation. Same people have said the priority is a CB and Winger.
  7. If Nunez continues his little temper tantrum and fucks off (getting pally with Barcelona's Araujo on instagram apparently) then I'd take a chance on Sesko even if it is a year (maybe two) too early.
  8. While he's not going to pull off a buzz cut he does have the hairline for a solid Verbal Kint.
  9. Not sure he has the hairline for that anymore, he's going for the side show bob comb over.
  10. If he does end up staying next season, and we do sign another wide forward (preferably a left footed right sided one) then we need to do a better job at managing Salah's minutes and it needs to be made clear to him that he's going to be benched or rested for certain games for his own good.
  11. Ten Hag making trying to make sure Bayern don't have to pay any compensation.
  12. They're not the only ones though. There's a reason they appointed a set piece coach and it wasn't so he could tell them to sign tall players. Their set pieces are more intentional than that (not that it doesn't help).
  13. Nicolas Jover is the man responsible.
  14. If he'd announced he was off to Ajax they might have burned the city down.
  15. We concede 10.83 (3.86 on target) shots per 90 compared to 8.36 (2.11 on target) for Arsenal and 7.91 (2.8 on target) for City, we've faced 390 shots compared to 301 for Arsenal and 277 for City. 139 (35.6%) of those shots were on target compared to just 76 (25.2%) for Arsenal, City's is also high at 98 (35.4%). Only a 0.02 swing in goals per shot between the three clubs We give up far more shots than the 2 teams above us and I agree entirely that it's structural.
  16. Not sure goals conceded is a useful metric for assessing our defence and how over/under stated any structural issues are. Shot's conceded, where/how they're conceded and the volume of chances we give up are all better metrics. My guess is that while we're only 5 or so behind the likes of Arsenal/City we conceded far more shots we just have a really good keeper.
×
×
  • Create New...