Liquid football

We've got the best goals per minute striker in the league and our other striker is Suarez. I reckon he wont.

He's really not shit but that's a stupid stat. Other than Man U, he was at all 3 of the other clubs in part for marketing reasons. He couldn't even get in the England side while he was at two of them.

I dont know, i think you might have a bias there.

So it turns out he's actually 105.7 minutes per goal according to the official. Best strike rate in the league by a country mile by the way.

Sturridge is on roughly a goal every 107 minutes since he joined Liverpool

It does when you realise just how much "guiding" Fergie will be doing. Not many top managers would tolerate it but Moyes will.

A terrible blow for our blue cousins. Their saviour leaving the club and possibly even Moyes leaving too.

The reason i wouldn't be amazed is because Fergie is a control freak and he'll probably be there the whole time "guiding" Moyes. He'd know he can do that with Moyes whereas it might not be the case with other good managers.

Goliath Fortune-Bibb

I could see the value of gay players soaring as clubs battle to diversify their brands and Allardyce claiming Diame loves Big Fun for no immediately obvious reason in the press after a few clubs make it known they're interested. Further down the line you could easily see managers outing established gay players as "not that gay" during contract negotiations.

I'd chill out

You cant edit after 10 minutes. You need to learn to read. Especially if you're going to attempt condescension. That, or reply quicker. And yes you have completely gone off on one by the way. Not my fault. My suspicion was that if it was the woman then it could be a) CNN using some woman as a go to witness b) some woman who was a bit nuts and desperate to get onto the news during some big event but i hadn't even given it much thought. I was on here for another thread and this thread title made me remember the video i watched today.

it probably wasn't simple enough

Did i say anything about a well oiled plan? I said CNN interviewed what looks to be the same woman on 2 occasions. And what's this giant leap you've made with "They have so many involved in this amazing, well oiled plan" Where did i say anything about that?

What plan? Seems that your mind is the one racing here. What's this plan? edit. and if you can tell me who "they" are as well, i'd be made up.

expand that picture. Same eyebrows Same jawline Same hair length and colour. Note that the hair is parted in exactly the same spot. If you find it hard to view, rewind the 2nd vid to 2:45. Exactly the same parting. Look at the pictures again. Look at the way the hair flicks up the very bottom. Nasolabial folds - identical. BUT now i'm looking at the Sandy Hook interview again im not so sure on that one. I think it's possible people have gone out trying to find something with that Sandy Hook one.

Im not convinced of that at all.

Why do you have to point it out?

Bullshit. You'd be up for a rear slamming for a cool billion.

I dont have any overarching theories on what this is all about but saw this video today. It's basically a woman/actor being interviewed live on CNN as a supposed witness to the Boston bombing and then as a witness to a shootout with the suspects of the bombing. Seems that when people noticed this they dug a bit deeper and found she had been interviewed in connection with the Sandy Hook massacre as well. Here's the original video: [YOUTUBE]SbqVqI1cWXc[/YOUTUBE] and here's the update when she was found to have been on CNN during the Sandy hook massacre. Jump to about 2:30 on this one: [YOUTUBE]s89y7uE9u4Q[/YOUTUBE]

Read another article along these lines today. A crime mystery. It's going down, but no one really knows why | Andrew Rawnsley | Comment is free | The Observer Some of the comments are hilarious by the way. England is the most negative whiny country on Earth bar none. edit. the gist of the article is that crime is falling uniformly throughout the "developed world" and has been for decades.

Averaging a goal every 120 minutes since he signed.

I'd have him as a plan B coming off the bench but he wont be happy with that so there's no point.

The statements have obviously been carefully managed. You have Ayre, Rodger and Suarez. All of them are perfectly in line with each other. There are 2 main elements in the quotes. 1st element is all about Suarez accepting responsibility, personal growth and making him look as good as possible. 2nd element is highlighting the inconsistency of the FA. Suarez quote: Suarez accepting responsibility, rehabilitation and making him look better. FA inconsistency Suarez accepting responsibility, rehabilitation and making him look better. Ayre quote: Suarez accepting responsibility, rehabilitation and making him look better. FA inconsistency Suarez accepting responsibility, rehabilitation and making him look better. Rodgers quote: Slight dig at the FA Suarez accepting responsibility, rehabilitation and making him look better.

If he is perceived as never taking responsibility for his actions (which he most definitely is up until this point) it's certainly not going to get any easier for him here is it? Only worse.