bouncebrigade

In an ideal world, we'd play them both in midfield.

Hendo > Rambo

Let's do a sex wee on them.

Terrorist attack in Mali. Nothing to do with the religion of peace, I'm sure. Fucking cunts.

It's like comparing apples and oranges.

That's harsh on vegatables.

Whatever the case, I'll give you long odds on Barcelona ever coming knocking on Joe Allen's door. I do like him, however.

I don't recallsus ever having a keeper anywhere near De Gea's level. Even Reina in his prime didn't come close.

Would you ever shut the fuck up. No kids, no clue, pointless guessing what is going on in the minds of hard working parents trying to give their kids a bright spark in their lives.

You should give the team talk tonight.

Potential banana skin.

Fanks, but no fanks.

No chance of us keeping a clean sheet. Head says 2-1, heart says 3-1.

Get off your fucking high horse.

Which is an entirely fair point to make and in no way suggests that kidless people wouldn't be horrified either.

Malaysian Airlines are doing a half price offer, via Diego Garcia. Or something.

I prefer to read, which is proving a challenge at present. The same fella is now talking about computer games. Fuckin 'ell.

Fucking hell, the shite some people talk on public transport in the morning. Keep your voice down you stupid cunt, I'm only awake 15 minutes.

30-35 minutes absolute tops. A bit more if there's an emergency diversion.

They might try but they wouldn't have much of an argument in any rational person's mind.

I don't disagree with any of that. I only jumped in to this discussion to talk about anti-semitism vs. Islamophobia.

We are talking about religion here. Not methods of execution.

That's interesting. I wasn't aware Assyrians, Shias and Yazidis were occupying forces who should be raped, pillaged and murdered.

If you're asking me why they weren't quizzed then the answer is I don't know. Why the fuck is that even relevant? But what I am telling you is that if Catholics were quizzed then the answer would have been as I previously stated (we don't support them etc). I don't think the two are comparable either and I think your analysis is overly simplistic. As bad as they were, the IRA didn't go around quoting the bible and trying to justify their acts as extreme interpretations of this book. They were overwhelmingly Catholic but their role was primarily against occupying forces. Of course there were sectarian acts committed, but their bread and butter was attacking British soldiers to try and achieve a full British withdrawal and they weren't after a "Catholic caliphate" or anything resembling it. They wanted a united Ireland, but one encompasssing Protestants and whoever else wanted to be there. Whereas ISIS...

How do you know they weren't asked to condemn such activities? The majority of people in Ireland despised the IRA, including myself (albeit I wasn't around for the very worst of it). Fucking knuckle dragging cunts every one of them. My involvement in this discussion started out in response to Islamophobia vs. anti-semitism. I'm fucked if I'm getting into another boring, pointless IRA-related dicussion.