RedEagle

Fact is also that the cunts were trying to sell us a few months back.

I don't understand the clobber for a young manager? At most, he will last 5 years. There is no Ferguson out their. A successful manager is what we need, a hungry manager.

As I think Madrid will still go through I will be supporting that gobshite Mourinho for one night only. God-speed you horrible twat.

It was done over the phone today. All very sudden. I think that there may be something in his family life possibly as the statement said. You wouldn't sack someone like that over the phone surely?

Is it worth defiling the stadium? For the sake of what i'd hazard a guess at being a minute amount in terms of revenue. It's just the most glaring option if you were going to bolster revenue, which to me is worrying. If you asked a 15 year old that they would come up with that idea. We need innovation.

Big screens are being installed at Anfield soon apparently. I know all this 'we have to move with the times' stuff gets floated around but surely, the revenue that comes from some anonymous advertiser at half time is not worth it? I know Ayre and Co have sat round and spoke in cryptic corporate language and came up with the most obvious idea in the world with the giant screen, but if they had anything about them the focus wouldn't be on putting screens in Anfield. It would be on a marketing plan that utilises the club's standing across the world. Planning Application Search A little part of football dies each day.

There's also one in Huyton village.

Sick of bad gobshites having a go. Nobody has a clue what went on during Rafa's tenure. Half-mangled rumours seem to trickle down and people, like Ant, form opinions on individuals from these rumours. We know things went wrong towards the end under Rafa, as happens with the majority of manager jobs. But the vitrol aimed towards a European Cup winning manager is a disgrace.

Suarez not playing today.

God is a concept by which we measure our pain GOD- John Lennon (1970) - YouTube

Stevies taking the piss out of the blueshite their? I'm the Daddy haha

Seems a lovely website. Here are some quotes from your moderators: Under the thread title 'Liverpool potentially prevented Everton from winning the European cup' Shogun Think of what Man Utd have achieved in the premier league era... if it wasn't for liverpool, that would be us Rugby Toffee We had the best team by far in Europe at that time. I for one honestly believe we would have won the European Cup. Those days are long gone and yes I am a bitter Evertonian and do blame the wall pushing Kopites

Never-say-die John Terry ignores brickbats and does what he does best | Football | The Guardian That is a fucking joke. 'Heroic leader' Kim John Il

Thanks for the reply. I'm still lost however. The FA won't need this 'evidence' if Suarez has admitted saying 'Negrito' or whatever he's said. The evidence is right their. Suarez has admitted saying it. Now, I believe the FA are completely wrong to charge him as the term was not used in a racist manner and the term itself is not racist. That's just the FA being fools. But I don't understand the argument that there was no other witnesses as Suarez has admitted using the term.

First of all, i'm completely behind Suarez. But I don't understand people saying 'Where is the evidence?' because hasn't Suarez admitted using 'Negrito' or some other word? I'm not saying the term is racist at all, i'm just wondering is that what allows the FA to justify their verdict without any secondary evidence?