Numero Veinticinco

No, you haven’t. I’m asking how more democracy is less democracy, you’re answering a question that goes something like ‘how is ignoring the result of a legally binding, fact-based, free and fair referendum democratic’. That’s nothing to do with either the question I asked or reality. So could you answer how more democracy is less democracy. Please.

Yeah, fucking ridiculous. Democracy, eh.

Even if it was democratic, having an additional vote to give the same people a free vote wouldn’t be less democratic it would be more. Ardj still hasn’t explained how more democracy is less democracy.

Also, why the fuck were Aussie citizens allowed to vote?

They’re opportunistic cunts that talk about caring but when it comes down to it they will side with the Tory counts rather than the country?

No it isn't.

I've never seen you change your view. Not one time. What's the point? Also, there's nothing mature about respecting antidemocratic, potentially very dangerous and destructive views, so I'm not really interested.

Yes, you keep saying what we can do - thanks for that. I would prefer a democratic choice. You've still not explained how giving us more democracy is less democratic. You never will, because it's impossible. The result of the non-binding referendum that was built upon a back of fucking lies and only narrowly passed by a couple of percent, lead to triggering of article 50 and negotiations. We now have a much, much clearer picture of what brexit entails. Can you, for a final time, explain how - now that there's more information available - giving more choice to the electorate, including the ability to leave and self-destruct, is less democratic. How is giving more democratic choice less democratic?

I don't respect your views and have already told you to fuck off because of it.

What? You voted? Can you please explain to me how giving people more democracy is antidemocratic? I don't want you to repeat that you think we should respect the results of the referendum. I'm asking how giving more democracy and more choice is less democratic.

Haha. Okay. So the leave campaign said tha... You know what? Okay. I fundamentally disagree with you on this and actually think your view is antidemocratic and the result of being against a democratic choice for the people is not just fucking repugnant but the result of it would punish and even kill a lot of people. So there's no real point in discussing it.

That's big of you. 'Oh, you want to avoid a disaster because you now know more than the lies you were told and have changed your mind? TOUGH SHIT. EAT RATS'. Fuck off.

Yes, because you don't want to give a democratic choice to the electorate out of a misguided understanding of what democracy is. In this case, you think it should only happen one time without the electorate being able to change their mind now that we know more about it. Me, I think it's okay for the power to be with the electorate, I think it's okay for voters to change their mind. Mainly because I believe in democratic freedoms.

If they don’t support Corbyn - or anyone - in a bid to stop No Deal, they should be remembered as the ones who allowed it.

I nearly pissed myself laughing at that. One of the worst I’ve seen. Not even fucking around.

And that’s your opinion. Others disagree. That’s why we have elections. Talking about it like it’s a fact rather than a viewpoint isn’t going to convince anyone, though.

Oh, cool. You're still arguing about property prices.

Keep thinking. Seriously, there’s a bit more than just that.

Yeah, it’s nonsense. Some is sound financial investment, most is luck, time, and multiple external factors.

Great.

Estimated by? Probably something to do with adding all his salary together or something.

Made it all in fruit and veg? Those supersized marrows can’t be cheap.

I’d be surprised if that was true, to be honest. He was a trade union rep and then worked in government ever since I think.

Yeah, you’d never vote for one of those would you.