Bjornebye

On 18/06/2025 at 13:20, A Red said:

I'd get rid of penalty shoots and have open ended golden goal where each team has to take a player off every 5 minutes

Hahaha that’s mental. Everton would probably take their keeper off. 
 

I agree re shootouts though. I know we’ve won our fair share but it’s a lottery I love watching them if I’m not invested in either side but when I am I just can’t watch. 

Is this him????

1 hour ago, Heinze said:

Farmers league though...

 

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/florian-wirtz-liverpool-player.460385/

 

 

Refreshing to read some posts on their about us signing him. Completely different to the bile and lies Everton create. But equally great to see their heads have fallen off about it as well. 

17 minutes ago, A Red said:

By high horse you actually mean correcting or educating you. You seemed to have learned recently and im sure you'll appreciate it one day.

Yeah that’s what I meant. I don’t know what I’d do without you educating me. 
 

1 hour ago, Strontium said:

 

You must be reading a different BBC or Guardian to me.

That's funny. You only seem to like your own right wing stuff. 
 

Is it the fact that the Guardian speaks more truth than your usual shite that pisses you off? 

Can we talk more about the pant shitting. I’m 4 years behind section but I can see it

being a problem. 

14 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

palestinians would be better off if nethanyahu wasnt there

Life would 

15 minutes ago, Engineman Hicks said:

What ? Saying that the average Iranian would be better off if there was a revolution. That post ? 

No. Me asking you (as you know) if the one country that’s invading others deserves to be defeated. Don’t keep skirting round the question 

Just now, Engineman Hicks said:

We live in a world with a white noise backdrop of bad news about the world, climate apocalypse, war, famine etc. Every news editor makes a choice every day as to which stories are highlighted and we as news consumers make a choice as to which items we care about.
 

Most people don’t care about any of it, some claim to care about everything and most people make choices somewhere in between. But you still make a choice about what to care about everyday and the protagonists in these conflicts know that and try to manipulate your choices accordingly. This is all uncontroversial year one media studies shit. 
 

my only point is when you get outaged by Israel but not infant mortality in India or the wars in the Congo Sudan, Yemen etc you’re making a choice, your choosing which news item to react to and which one to ignore and maybe people should reflect on why they are making that choice.

 

Pointing this out isn’t deflection or minimising what’s happening in the specific conflict you’ve got exercised about, it’s just an observation that you had a choice to focus on this war compared to lots of others and you should have the self awareness to acknowledge why you made that choice. I really don’t think that’s a controversial point. 
 

Why won’t you answer my question? 

6 minutes ago, Carradona said:

Hicks outing himself as a horrible genocide-sympathiser is shocking, I tell the. Get him booted off the forum to fuck. Michael Gove as his political hero, a fan of Boris Johnson and now this. 

 

Im all for people having different opinions (I'd not ask for Strontium, Rico or A Red to be banned) but that fucker is on another level. I'd question if he's even a Liverpool fan.

Strontz Rico and A Red add to the forum. I don’t agree with a lot of their stuff but it would be a worse place without them. 
 

Hicks…. I always think he’s a nice guy in real life but he’s testing the water huge time on this thread. That Iran post fuck me 

13 minutes ago, Jurgen Knows said:

So as I said I won’t indulge your discussions of my person so I’ll just respond to the points on topic.

 

Yes one culture might have different moral standards than another culture. That is not the point.

 

The point is that governments don’t wage wars to spread morality. They wage wars to further their interests. It’s a simple truth really and you understand it very well. You just try to divert away because it doesn’t suit the narrative you are pushing.

While a lot of what you say about it is true it doesn’t change the fact you’re shit at cricket 

17 minutes ago, Barrington Womble said:

 

It's funny, when we won the CL a few years back, that was valueless as well. Nobody cared for European football anymore, the real measure was what city were doing. When we did it the year after, despite having enough points to win the league when COVID struck, he decided it was null and void. 

 

If this iteration of the league is done. What would it take to be undone? Someone other than us winning it? 

 

Genuinely, he has to be a red on a piss take. Even the bloos are not this deranged. 

Apparently the weirdo lives in Blackburn 

Just now, Jack the Sipper said:

 

So you're different then, you're better, is that it? Whereas politicians only pretend to use morality to further their ends, you actually do want to be guided by your morality in shaping how the world should be. Even accepting that, why should I or anyone else who doesn't share your idea of what moral is at any given point in time be happy with that state of affairs? Why is intervening in another states affairs, to the point of overthrowing governments because you believe it's the moral thing to do any more palatable to me that a politician doing the same thing because it helps them get elected? 

 

As with your tedious truth bombs. I don't this you've thought this through. You believe that morals are absolute and objective, to act morally is a good thing to do, full stop, while to act out of ones own best interests is inherently bad. Like I said it's simplistic. It also sounds like the sort of bollocks that comes from religious nuts.

While I agree that the poster you’re replying to is a reptile, how is wanting to be morally correct “simplistic” ? Surely being a fucking arse-hole is less “simplistic” 

There is nothing easier in the world than just being a decent person who cares about others. 

1 minute ago, Mudface said:

 

Spurs were so relaxed about their league position they sacked the manager who won their first European trophy in 40 years. Man Utd are in chaos- they would likely have dismissed Amorim if they could afford to and have had to increase ticket prices to cover the shortfall in revenue from no European qualification, causing great resentment amongst the fan groups.

Yeah but if it wasn’t for Heysel Everton would have won the World Series 

3 minutes ago, magicrat said:

I’m worried about letting Quansah go

Nah, I used to think he had it but he hasn’t. If we get 40 million for him it’s an absolute bargain. Plus by all accounts he’s a massive sleazeball 

1 hour ago, Scott_M said:

Nunez going “Where’s me lemo laaaa?” would be the best thing he’s done in 3 years with us by a considerable distance. 

Not the winning goals at Newcastle, Brentford and his two against United. Just the teeth. I thought you went the game? He’s fucking loved at Anfield. Not so much on here 

5 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

Out of interest, do we have anyone in favour of half a million kids in India dying of malnutrition?

Doubtful. What’s happening there is horrible. India seemingly back Israel but does that mean the people have to suffer? No. 
 

Cunt world. 

1 minute ago, Arniepie said:

if anyone thinks the likes of netanyahu or trump gives a flying fuck about the iranian people.ive got some magic beans you can buy.

Its racism. Plain and clear. 

7 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

You going to back this up, or can we just assume you're talking shit for the sake of talking shit?

He’s trying to get a reaction so he can attempt to sit on his high horse. Same as he always does. 

Hahahahahahaha he’s fucking gutted 

4 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

What's the story from Gambia? I can't find anything on the BBC Africa page or even al Jazeera.

Just an excuse for racists to comment. 

Another 21 shot queuing for food and 11 blown up with a missile. 
 

But ….. erm…… white on black etc 

Israel has a right to defend itself. I fully agree. 
 

Does Iran? Does Palestine? Does Jordan? 
 

If the answer to the question is no you’re a racist scumbag. 
 

Israel is the only country invading people in the Middle East. The world is waking up. 

5 minutes ago, A Red said:

Nah, not in that colour. Now if you had some white on black, well, now you're talking.

 

Wow 

9 minutes ago, Anubis said:

Fair play to Chiles. Getting paid for this nonsense is some accomplishment. Up there with having the country speculating that his marriage was breaking down because he'd been playing hide the sausage with his then co-presenter, Christine Bleakley, who was so far out of his league she was in another dimension. I mean fair play, you'll forever be able to just smile and raise an eyebrow whenever anyone asks you about it.

Did he shag her? Jammy twat. I agree, it’s best he’s kept doing articles about his favourite toaster than being on the telly making punditry even more boring than watching England beat Armenia 2 nil etc