toneloc

No but we have had to spend to get those players - no spend = no champions of Europe The starting point of this thread was comparing us to Leverkusen who have spent nothing I agree that Liverpool cannot be compared to West Brom and Burnley, so by the same virtue, neither can we be compared to Leverkusen

Spending nothing and playing decent football, without trying to control games has not done Burnley much good. And don't think West Brom fans would agree with that approach

there is no answer to this question - been doing the rounds for years just a made up question by some nobead

There must be something in it for someone for people to keep buying it. I wouldn't be surprised if they did fuck off with the windfall and then sell the ground off for housing or something

they have been given 7 days

Looks like he's going for Rio then I feel nauseous

To the tune of Charlie had a pigeon..... Terry is a Mongo, a Mongo, a Mongo Terry is a Mongo, a Mongo, he is He shags his mates birds and he'll fuck them all night and when he gets home his cock stinks of ........ Terry is a Mongo............................

Can we also ask what commercial success we have had since the Standard Chartered deal. After the deal with SCB was signed, he described it as a significant milestone in the club’s history. However, he expected a number of lucrative deals to be signed off in the future. What deals? Following the tour to Asia he said "We are very well represented in Asia, more so than any other club. Our fans in Asia showed they are a fantastic group of people, incredibly positive, incredibly motivated with a sense of purpose, and most of all a sense of pride," So why is it that we generate less revenue commercially from a wider fan base. It constantly mystifies me why, with Liverpools fans base, that we don't generate anywhere near the turnover that Man Utd do - it is not gate receipts alone