Jump to content

ratcatcher

Registered
  • Posts

    7,699
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by ratcatcher

  1. I dont have a problem with a successful 'businessman' being involved with running the club. To an extent. Its what we all want isnt it? For the club to have loads of money to be able to spend it wisely in the transfer market. And that's the key, spending the money wisely. I would have a problem if this gordon character had the ultimate veto on our transfer targets or, dictated to the manager which players he can not sign. But even that is tempered to a degree because these threads are awash with people saying no manager at any club has ultimate say in who is signed and they all work under some control to a greater or lesser degree. As I said, its whether the control is towards the greater end or not.
  2. Its a gerrard farewell not a team bonding.
  3. Just like all people in a position of power, blatter is never going to give it up lightly especially when he can have women nearly 30 years younger than him hanging on his arm. Like Ive said, he's been very, very clever to make sure none of the shit splashes him. But this prince from jordan was never a credible challenger was he? I mean where in the fuck in world football are jordan? No-fucking-where. But, even a heavyweight would have struggled to topple blatter. His power base of African, Asian and South America FA's do not see him the way the rest of the world do. UEFA could hurt him though. UEFA is the richest and most powerful in the FIFA confederations. Money and a boycott of FIFA competitions may have the desired effect of weakinging FIFA but the big question is, does UEFA have the balls and wherewithall to do anything rather than just talk the talk? myself I doubt it because platini still harbours ambitions to one day head FIFA. Maybe unseating him would be a start?
  4. Its not taking the piss. Its Gerrard's goodbye and was arranged before sunday. Honestly some folk.
  5. As I said, yet more evidence of your manc obssession. My position on that is very clear. Suarez was fitted up \ dropped in it by the club's poor handling. You seem to think one has to comment on a thread because you start it? Weird.
  6. I still consider us a 'top' club or a 'big club' whatever people want to call it but, there's no doubt in my mind we're going backwards this year. Some clown was trying to suggest Ive stopped backing the manager. How so? Of course Im gutted about the result on Sunday and the performances this season. The manager has to look at himself but I dont think he's the sole creator of the mess. Owners, players, committees, scouts, manager all take the blame. That doesnt mean you stop supporting the manager. Some want him gone. But even if we got klopp they'd be whinging sooner or later. I agree the future does look bleak.
  7. No probs, I just wanted to clarify because a couple of people are desparately trying to read hidden means. Speaking of which, just WTF are you babbling on about now? If anyone appears to be obssessed with 'united' or manchester or that lot down the east lancs as I've called them previously, its you.
  8. Do try and keep up. I said 'he's right, isnt he?' That's a question, not a statement. But, I do think we tend to look backwards a little too much.
  9. Which is why I said 'tended to leave.'
  10. Because the threads arent contrasting them with us. Obviously. And the two different threads are for example different from the 4 or 5 on whether rodgers should be sacked. You dont have to read these threads which is the reason Im trying to jibb the endless rodgers out crap. Anyway, Id love to debate some more with yer but Im up at 5am to drive to fucking chester.
  11. Glad you've got some 'love' in your life because you sound like apart from that, you've fuck all really. Oh and not to mention gross inaccuracies. And clueless.
  12. Haha. You suggesting Im a manc? Kinell.
  13. Come on. Chelsea have just won the title. City arsenal and spurs finished above us yet united are the here and now?
  14. You're confusing backing the manager with where I see us right now. But Id expect nothing more from you.
  15. I dont think they are apart from a couple of sentences. But people can make their own judgement. It seems people would rather have god knows how many threads and polls on rodgers, sterling and the rest. Neither do I think the article is saying we're in terminal decline. Its saying can we expect to compete for the holy grail especially as UEFA look to relax FFP while the owners appear to have a committment to supporting its principles.
  16. I dont think we're in terminal decline either. But we're certainly not in any ascendency are we? Id hate to say we're in decline but that where I think we're at especially when you factor in where we've got to since 1990.
  17. Dunno. Is wallace a manc? Are only Liverpool fan writers like maddock and boardman only allowed to write articles on us now?
  18. OK, fair enough. But look closer. Gerrard didnt leave. Rush returned within 12 months. McManaman and Owen were cut from the same cloth. But that's not the point really is it? I mean we could play player tennis all night but the facts are the club is in a hell of a worse position now than at any time when the players you mention left. I really dont get this not bothered dont care attitude but each to their own.
  19. Er those players tended to leave on Liverpool's terms. Prior to Keegan and up to El Sulk, which greats have left at the peak of their career for better thing? No doubt some will mention mascherano but he was generally played out of position when he went to barcelona and took ages to establish himself. I agree sterling's a little shite. But what if Coutinho follows. Then Ibe. Then Wilson etc? Maybes. But I think the question of whether we can think about when the next title will be won is pertinent. Id be surprised if we win 19 in the next 10 years now unless a mega rich owner comes along and spends shitloads to win it.
×
×
  • Create New...