Jump to content

sean_dundee

Members
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

sean_dundee's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. Liverpool FC manager Rafa Benitez is on the verge of signing a pre-contract with Juventus according to Italian daily Tuttosport, however a conclusion to the deal is being held up by Benitez’s refusal to resign and relinquish his large severance clause in his Anfield contract, estimated at £16 million. Rafa Benitez has been linked with a move away from Anfield following a poor campaign this term in which Liverpool FC are unlikely to qualify for the Champions League, with Manchester City and Tottenham Hotpsur the two main contenders for fourth spot. On top of the poor on-field campaign Liverpool FC have been spiraling into chaos off the pitch, with George Gillet and Tom Hicks putting the club up for sale last week. Reports in Italy suggest that Juventus Chief John Eikann has told Juventus chief’s to wrap up a deal for the Spaniard with the Italian giants positioned seventh in Serie A. According to reports in Italy Liverpool FC boss Rafa Benitez is refusing to resign and join Juventus as he would have to wave all severance clauses in his contract, missing out on a potential £16 million. The Anfield boss currently has four years remaining on his contract at the Merseyside club. Benitez is reportedly expecting Juventus to agree tocompensate him with the £16 million future earnings, before he signs a pre-contract with the Serie A club. yeah he really loves liverpool doesnt he! fat greedy cunt. really hope he does fuckin go but what i cant understand is that most people on that rawk forum still think hes god and wont have a bad word said about him,they reckon 90 percent of fans liverpool fans want him as manager! thick rose tinted twats
  2. cant understand why people think these cunts wanna hang on at all costs,where will it get them. no money for transfers,no champions league,sell best players lose loads of money in merchandising end up in mid table at best,lose match day revenue ect ect ...would you sell now or when theyve took the club down this road?
  3. As Liverpool prepare to try and stay in the Europa League this week the club’s owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have been in London discussing their next financial move, and considering the implications should Rafael Benitez fail to deliver on his promise to steer the club into next season’s Champions League. I understand that the American owners, enjoying a rare joint visit to the UK, spent yesterday afternoon at the London client offices of leading City lawyers Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. By co-incidence Freshfields partner Mark Rawlinson is one of the ‘Red Knights’ plotting the purchase of Manchester United from the Glazers. Hicks and Gillett have faced similar supporter disquiet over their ownership of Liverpool and are attempting to re-finance the club’s £237m debts. RBS, their principle lender, has requested that they reduce the debt by £100m ahead of a refinancing deadline in the summer. Rothschilds and Merryl Lynch, the advisors retained by Gillett and Hicks respectively, and club managing director Christian Purslow have been engaged in a global search for third-party investment for months but a deal is yet to be struck. The deadline for a £105m offer from New York-based investors the Rhone Group, who were hoping to secure a 40% stake in the club, passed on Monday. Sources close to the owners say that yesterday’s talks were a general discussion of the owners’ options rather than focused on a specific deal. “There’s nothing imminent,” said one. Purslow has previously said that five or six interested parties are still in play but it appears that all are some distance from meeting the Americans’ valuation. Hicks and Gillett have previously maintained that any third-party investor would have to pay a price that reflects the club’s potential increase in value after the new Anfield, which is yet to leave the drawing board, is built. With the credit markets still depressed and the RBS deadline looming it may be harder for the owners to meet their valuation, but that does not mean refinancing will fail. While RBS would like to see the debt come down it is still highly likely that the bank would offer the Americans a fresh deal. The downside for Hicks and Gillett, as they seek yet another short-term fix to their problems at Anfield, is that such a deal would cost significantly more in fees and interest. If they succeed it will be the third time in as many years that they have had to strike a new deal with the banks, racking up fees every time. The need for a long-term solution that allows work on the new stadium to begin remains. Text size Share this article Print this article Mail this article Recent Posts Liverpool co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett in London to discuss refinancing April 7th, 2010 16:56 3 Comments Mawhinney urges Football League to tackle financial reform in parting shot April 7th, 2010 13:54 1 Comment Five reasons the Manchester United's Glazers might say no to the Red Knights March 3rd, 2010 13:30 Should English clubs fear Uefa's financial plans? January 22nd, 2010 11:06 What have the Glazers got in common with Curly Wurlies? More than you think… January 20th, 2010 16:09 COMMENTS
  4. sounds like rbs will bottle it As Liverpool prepare to try and stay in the Europa League this week the club’s owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have been in London discussing their next financial move, and considering the implications should Rafael Benitez fail to deliver on his promise to steer the club into next season’s Champions League. I understand that the American owners, enjoying a rare joint visit to the UK, spent yesterday afternoon at the London client offices of leading City lawyers Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. By co-incidence Freshfields partner Mark Rawlinson is one of the ‘Red Knights’ plotting the purchase of Manchester United from the Glazers. Hicks and Gillett have faced similar supporter disquiet over their ownership of Liverpool and are attempting to re-finance the club’s £237m debts. RBS, their principle lender, has requested that they reduce the debt by £100m ahead of a refinancing deadline in the summer. Rothschilds and Merryl Lynch, the advisors retained by Gillett and Hicks respectively, and club managing director Christian Purslow have been engaged in a global search for third-party investment for months but a deal is yet to be struck. The deadline for a £105m offer from New York-based investors the Rhone Group, who were hoping to secure a 40% stake in the club, passed on Monday. Sources close to the owners say that yesterday’s talks were a general discussion of the owners’ options rather than focused on a specific deal. “There’s nothing imminent,” said one. Purslow has previously said that five or six interested parties are still in play but it appears that all are some distance from meeting the Americans’ valuation. Hicks and Gillett have previously maintained that any third-party investor would have to pay a price that reflects the club’s potential increase in value after the new Anfield, which is yet to leave the drawing board, is built. With the credit markets still depressed and the RBS deadline looming it may be harder for the owners to meet their valuation, but that does not mean refinancing will fail. While RBS would like to see the debt come down it is still highly likely that the bank would offer the Americans a fresh deal. The downside for Hicks and Gillett, as they seek yet another short-term fix to their problems at Anfield, is that such a deal would cost significantly more in fees and interest. If they succeed it will be the third time in as many years that they have had to strike a new deal with the banks, racking up fees every time. The need for a long-term solution that allows work on the new stadium to begin remains. Text size Share this article Print this article Mail this article Recent Posts Liverpool co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett in London to discuss refinancing April 7th, 2010 16:56 3 Comments Mawhinney urges Football League to tackle financial reform in parting shot April 7th, 2010 13:54 1 Comment Five reasons the Manchester United's Glazers might say no to the Red Knights March 3rd, 2010 13:30 Should English clubs fear Uefa's financial plans? January 22nd, 2010 11:06 What have the Glazers got in common with Curly Wurlies? More than you think… January 20th, 2010 16:09 COMMENTS
  5. the biilboard posters were a great idea and had some impact but i was thinking what about doing some wild west style "wanted" posters changed to not wanted..george "gerbil" gillett and tom "hamhock" hicks or something along those lines with a picture of a rodent with gillets face on it and a picure of a potbellied pig with fat cunt hicks face on it..reward.."your fuckin club back" maybe with some crosshairs aimed at there foreheads and just plaster them all over town then get shirts made maybe in black or somert with the same pic on the front then maybe some of the cunts false promises highlighted on the back that every cunt can wear a inside anfield maybe scarvesthe same too all in black just an idea and will probably get ripped to pieces as usual but ireally dont givea fuck about childish negs somethings needed that everyone can jump on like the manc twats scarves
  6. carry on wanking off over your rafa centre spread in shoot magazine you complete cunt
  7. as some of you may be aware the ramones were a rock/punk band formed in 1974 in new york and were quiet frankly fuckin shit. so why do i see spotty fucking teenagers donning ramones t shirts thinking they look fucking cool and cannot probably name 1 song by this scruffy yankee bunch of tramps. you also get so called celebrity cunts wearing them like that bell end tim lovejoy. when martin freeman from the office was on his crap show he asked that smarmy twat lovejoy if he knew 2 songs by them and of course sheer fucking silence.i just dont get it.
  8. yea sure maybe if you didnt play 8 defensive players every game we might score more goals!!
  9. i think its the fucking truth and some of the assholes on here that just wanna give people shit and neg people should wake up...i mean surely im not the only one that thinks this,but never any support..bunch of smart arse wankers a lot of cunts on here
×
×
  • Create New...