silverlining

 

I'll be honest Pig, I've had to neg this. Nothing personal but your put downs, and the one you love by Lurtz, make me cringe. And you can't mention ANYTHING remotely negative about Lurtz or Melons without you being all over it. Whether they are right or wrong.

 

I've never noticed Flying Pig before, but he/she is really shit and annoying. And painfully obsequious.

You can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep innit? And having Flying Pig as an interweb chum is fucking embarrassing.

Well...

I've read your thread. It's a spat. She'll come crawling back.

Oh wonderful

I am so glad I didn't google that. Even if I still don't quite understand what it is.

That said, I'm sure it's only a matter of time before Alan Sex posts a picture of one. Or a gif of one being used if we're really unlucky.

It's a flashlight with a rubber 'pussy' inside you can shove your cock into.

Er....really? What's the point of that?

I come back and within hours Leeds and Newcastle have declared all out war.

 

Of course, it's not just the hand gel. Geordies regularly sing about how they've stolen all the fog on the Tyne.

 

And Brendan, seriously, you're not fooling anyone. Your newfound love for the denizens of Newcastle is only because Lurtzy hates them.

What? WHAT?!

Actually, no. I was dragged into this because I was mentioned BY NAME.

I'm not allowed to talk directly to Blertz anymore.

But I don't mind Geordies at all. I mean, they're pretty harmless aren't they? It's not like they're not fucking Welsh or whatever.

I'm not saying I want to live there or anything, like.

Does anyone know what a "fleshlight" is?

I'm too scared to google, given ChickenLicken mentioned it. Bound to be sordid.

Fucking hell.

Not having a go at Dicky Mint, but that "toot toot" put down is fecking brilliant.

Oh my Christ. Who is this div?

If you bothered to read my post #45 you would have seen the reason for the 'virgin' reference. Incidentally "virgin" will always be a better put down than "yer maa" for two reason; 1) Virgin is in the bible & 2) The Young Ones used it 30 to hilarious effect.

 

Yer maa

 

 

 

I would suggest the 14 reps I had in the last 6 days for slagging you off and your ONE gay little neg, proves otherwise.

 

Back to the stable Mary, it's Christmas soon.

"gay little neg"?

"Back to the stable mary"?

Are you a homophobe?

Oh, ziggers is very often wrong. It's his age.

Savillelining in a blatant "I love Geordies" PR stunt in an attempt to increase his quickly shrinking fanbase in the North East.

 

Neg away virgin.

You're not very good at this

Only if they are Kosher surely?

Pork substitute. Yummy.

Don't know if he did, sure I remember Lurtz wanting him banned because he was having a go at him.

 

I presume he went whining to Dave about him like he did with Silvelining. Don't see the issue myself both clearly just having a nice little joke and meant nothing by it.

Oh, my name has been mentioned in vain!

Well, chevette, I was naturally positively predisposed towards you because of your ace Eastwood avatar, and where you're from is irrelevant, really.

I don't mind Geordies at all, myself. They're generally nice enough.

I suppose you could go into the usual regional stereotype: love the fitbah; enjoy a beer or ten; prone to exposing their fat bellies to the elements etc, but they're usually salt of the earth, honest types. You wouldn't be worried about them nicking your girlfriend or anything like that. Well, I wouldn't be anyway.

As for the very amusing and insightful Flaneur, I don't think he's been banned.

One could argue that if Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Syria exercised a more liberal, cerebal and tolerant form of Islam then they would collectively have a Jewish community that does not fit on a double decker bus.

 

No, no. They're just misunderstood! And some Jews probably DO eat babies.

Zonkers, your approach to this whole rep/neg thing of ours will, I can warn you now, NOT END WELL.

I think the fact that his beastly treatment of Jews (and gays and the disabled etc) also coincided with Germany's decision to invade Poland and mobilise one of the largest fighting forces in the world was the main reason

If only there was some kind of, I dunno, first and last solution to all this. The phrase is on the tip of my tongue.. Ending solution? Something like that.

 

Of course. I jest. This is the GF after all. At least I'm not taking the piss out of the Geordies...

 

Can't help but think that this is part of a double whammy of electioneering, and a bit of housekeeping in preparation for the gloves coming off against Iran.

Well, understandably the West want Iran fucking dealt with, because they're essentially a failed state run by dangerous religious lunatics who fund terrorism across the world. Like many Muslim countries do.

So if Israel's "gloves come off" you can bet your last shekel that it's been OK'ed by her pals on this side of the ideological schism.

The Jews had every right to have a state of their own after what's happened to them while the rest of the world stood by and watch. It's not too much to ask after such events to take charge of your destiny and not rely on others to not decide all their problems stem for the Jews and order your extermination.

 

I agree. I think I said that in my post. Sort of.

A Jewish state in Israel was founded in order to provide a home for the Jews. The only home for the Jews. There are 22 Arab nations and over 5,000,000 square miles under their control. Poor Arabs have nowhere to live! Evil Nazi Zionists with their blasphemous idea of having a state to call their own. EVIL, get rid of them.

Yeah, but I sometimes wonder if it would have been better for Israel to have been positioned somewhere...I dunno...a bit less fighty.

Call me crazy but isn't this why Israel was 'returned' to the Israelis in the first place?

Israel was "given back" to the Jew as a place for them to call home largely because millions of them were killed and scattered across the world in a variety of pogroms and exterminations, culminating in The Holocaust.

Obviously, it's a bit difficult for some Zionist scholars to accept this, and they'd argue that the establishment of the state of Israel would have happened without The Holocaust and WWII.

But this is entirely bollocks.

Reparations from the (West) German government and resources and approval from a variety of other sympathetic, supportive countries allowed Israel to exist and thrive.

Naturally, one might wonder if the way the state of Israel came about has damaged the psyche of the Israeli people; it can't feel great being given your land, rather than taking it, and certainly the Holocaust is a terribly high price to pay for some Middle-East real estate by the sea, and being surrounded by people who hate you is naturally going to make you a bit paranoid and prone to the occasional overreaction.

But this spat in Gaza will go the way of all the rest; as soon as the US and Britain tell them to fucking pack it in, after approximately one or two days of hubristic bluster, Israel will do as it's told. As it always does. Because it has no other choice.

Oh dear. He looks like a twat.

I just couldnt help but think that what your saying about them maps being properganda and not being the total truth.

 

The points you make about how the Jews accepted the UN plan and the Arabs didnt,and the Arab want to eradicate the Jews both not really telling the whole truth but it is only a slight part of both truths.

 

I mean the Jew s accepting the proposal is spot on and I mean seriously if somebody offered me all this land I would take it to,I mean wouldnt everybody?

 

The Arabs not accepting it couldnt be by chance because the land was theres anyway and all that was going on is there owned land being given away to the Jews by the UN.

 

Which if that was me then i wouldnt accept either and would try to take the land back.

 

Then the eradicating bit is in all truth they went to get there lands back and 5 other Arab nations went with them but they got there arses kicked?

 

But just before that there was a mass exodus of Palastians of 100s of 1000s who were so confident of the Arabs winning they all left there homes, leaving behind bascially all they owned as in cash jewellery food etc,thinking they would be back there in a few days time?

 

Plus the fact why would they leave in that number at all if they though they going to win.

 

Also the fact that the Jews were only defending themselves(something they still use today and if you think about this a country vastily superiour to a country with the sum basis of fuck all attacking it) was been told by all.

 

Now that is what was reported at the time and apart from leaving everything behind and the vast number who left as well makes me think it dosent look right.

 

It is only when you then hear that actually the Jews did slightly more then defend and they actually carried on and went to claim the lands the UN had given them,which meant the factually reported minimum of 10 total massacres of the Palastinian people owning the lands,the mass exodus reporting along with leaving all they own behind seem to be maybe to this version than the other.

 

Even further back when British controoled mandate of Palastine I am pretty sure they didnt have the right to just give away land owned by people to another set of people.

 

This happend again with 1947 when the Jews were being handed over 56% of the land for a vastily inferior number of people to the 46% the Palastinians were being given who vastily out numbered the Jews.

 

But to make matters worse around 92% of the land was owned by Palastinian Jews anyway.

 

Then the British I think as well not being as powerful they probably realised they had fucked up gave the problem to the UN.

 

The UN came under immense pressure from most other countries and especially America and pressure to declare a state of Israel as well.

Thank God you're here with your hastily Googled factoids and semi-coherent "Er, here's what I reckon" summaries.

Having said that, it's at least an attempt to be objective - albeit laughably ham-fisted - which makes a really refreshing change from the usual one-sided shite:

"The West and The Jews are very bad, powerful and horrible and they use super high-tech WEAPONS OF DOOM in order to kill babies. The poor little Arabs are wide-eyed innocents (who in no way at all would position civilians anywhere near sites of military importance), and the rockets they fire are a bit rubbish and basically a bit of a laugh really. Like fireworks or something."

How? What gets into a person's system by being bitten that they haven't practically bathed in on a daily basis for the last year in the form of zombie blood, guts, etc.?

But you've suspended belief long enough to accept that reanimated semi-sentient cadavers have overrun the planet, and want to eat everyone?

I don't want to diminish the suffering of anyone, but isn't that kind of the point of war, to do more damage to your opponents than they manage to do to you?

 

I mean, so far as I can see, nobody here is complaining that there were fifteen times more dead Germans after WWII than Brits.

 

I bet no Jews were complaining. The Germans were *beastly* towards the Jews. Really, really horrible.