Gnasher

Just now, Numero Veinticinco said:

For what benefit? 

Slit a few throats?

3 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

For all KS's calmness and professionalism he needs to start getting rough with these cunts.

Call them out make the headlines.

Not sure that's his style to be honest. Hes 20 plus ahead in the polls so he logically thinks he doesn't need to.

Just now, Babb'sBurstNad said:

 

He's dissing your shoes now Gnash. I wouldn't take that!

I know and I got the top trabs on. The mans a wrong un.

3 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

 

Eh? What are you talking about? I was admiring his use of grammar. I have no interest in your spats at all.

Sorry comrade.

8 minutes ago, House of Dirk said:

No doubt. And its a sign of where we are when nigh on three year old mud, that hasnt been part of the opposition for the fat end of that is the go-to line of attack.

 

I guess the hot take from 2023 this far is that we are a month nearer the next election.

It's a pathetic line of attack by a pathetic politican who's leading a pathetic party and a pathetic government.

It's to Starmers shame he doesn't defend Corbyn and  tell Sunak and the Tories to go fuck themselves.

2 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

He couldn’t give a fuck about Corbyn, he just knows it plays well. It’s just about throwing the only bit of mud he actually has on Starmer. It’s clearly not working according to the polls. 

Fuck off you silly shill. 

It "doesn't play well" at all. Sunak looks a pathetic little cunt for bringing it up. But you're a pathetic little cunt yourself so it's natural you emphasise with the tory midget. 

3 minutes ago, House of Dirk said:

Sunak has such a hardon for Jeremy Corbyn, its his low centre of gravity that prevents him toppling over.

 

Can he seriously not go a week without making a reference to him and hiding behind parliamentary priviledge to make some sort of slur on question 6 for all the headbangers to get tumescent over ? Not that any legal recourse would make a scrap of difference with his wifes money.

 

With Holocaust Memorial Day on the 27th, Sunak weaponised it for cheap point scoring, but it had the desired impact, with no right of reply and brays and honks from the cunts on the Tory benches. 

It's true. Everything is weaponised, little is genuine.

8 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

No, that’s this one: ~

Forgetting to change to other accounts now before posting.

7 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

People don't use semi colons in posts enough.

 

Oh gosh Sweeney has another mate. 

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

No, I don’t because that’s not what I said, but I remember what I actually said (that I could see your throat slit and not raise an eyebrow, as in, I don’t care about you enough to:.. well, explaining these things takes the fun away). The issue is you can’t read properly and have reading comprehension issues. I have no issue with those with learning disabilities, but being an obtuse dickhead alongside your ignorance is your choice and it’s the very basis of us being at loggerheads. You read something and think it says or means something else. Then you’re a cunt about it.

 

 

You’re an old man, enough of the pathetic threats you can’t back up; you’re embarrassing yourself. Also, and I can’t stress the importance of this enough, but the Enterprise is from the future. Get some culture, ffs. 

You carry on making comments about my throat being slit here Gimpy but never mind the starship enterprise, if I ever come across you in real life I'll punch you right back into your mother's black hole.

Anyway I thought this cunt and his aliases made a big song and dance about putting me on ignore?

2 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

Fantastic stuff all round. 

The razor boys are back in town. 

Just now, Numero Veinticinco said:

Are you trying to type ‘Sweeney’? As in Sweeney Todd. Good stuff. 

Good stuff indeed Gimpy. Because let me tell you something.  if I ever come across you in real life, you won't be given chance to glance at my throat I'll punch you so hard you'll end further back than the Starship Enterprise.

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

What? 

You said you wanted my throat slit. Remember?

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

And because he thought Corbyn was shite. 

Just now, Gnasher said:

 

Not really. I gave you legitimate reasons above.  

 

You calling out my name because your mate Sweenys back Section?

He ho.

2 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

Gnasher doesn't like O'brien probably because he's one of the most prominent anti Brexit voices in the media.

Not really. I gave you legitimate reasons above.  

You calling out my name because your mate Sweenys back Section?

3 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Yeah, I signed up for an account in 2009 just so I could agree with myself in 2023. Got to give me some credit for thinking ahead. 

How many necks you split in that time Sweeny?

As for tweedle dee and tweedle dum's attempts to smear Peter Oborne, yes he is indeed a life long tory. Yes he did indeed write for the Telegraph and the Mail.

He's also one of the best journalists this country has produced. 

If you agree with the man or not his opinions deserve an airing so as posted above this is his most recent article. And it's bang on the fucking money.

^ Why are the two aliases speaking to each other? 

Look out. The gruesome twosome are back on a keyboard.

6 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Voted for them? You’d expect so because he was a Tory party member until a few years ago and is a lifelong Tory voter. 

Oh look out Slipper posts and Sweeny Todd's back. 

Hope I can sleep safe in my bed 

10 minutes ago, Babb'sBurstNad said:

 

 

In what way did he do so?

Told everyone he was voting for Johnson when Johnson was running for Mayor of London. Johnson ran on a cunts platform of promising slashing wasteful public services and buying water cannons to turn on protesters. The beast needed feeding and plenty of media figures were all to willing to throw in their pound of meat.

Conveniently OBriean has forgot the points in Johnsons campaign he agreed enough to offer his vote although he's unsurprisingly managed to shoe-in Jeremy Corbyn to provide weight against those asking for reasons.

I blame Ash Sarkar.

11 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

Considering half of the many pundits whose comments you put up here are either Tory supporters like Dan Hodges or 'socialists' who prefer Sunak to 'Starmer the Nazi' you'd do well to play the ball not the man.

 

 

Hmm. Context. Just because I put up links to people like Dan Hodges does in no way mean I agree with them.

For example I've ridiculed Hodges only today for writing articles supporting Boris Johnson.

Just now, Bjornebye said:

 

It was his last question so he couldn't reply. As is always the case with leaders in PMQ's, they wait until the last question has been asked by the leader of the opposition then go into a bullshit tirade that gets cheers and whoops from the tories knowing they can't be countered thus giving the impression that they've knocked it out of the park.

 

Soundbites ... see Captain Hindsight etc. Corbyn was trending on twitter after PMQ's, Zahawi and Sunak weren't, job done. Kings of spin and deflection. 

The reason this shit continues to be spouted in Parliament is because the current leader of the Labour Party refuses to defend the policies of the previous leader of the Labour Party. 

As Oborne says, this country desperately needs the debate. Corbyns policies should be defended now as Starmer defended them then.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/uk-labour-blair-starmer-attlee-inspiration?s=09

Excellent as ever by Peter Oborne. Right on the button.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/uk-labour-blair-starmer-attlee-inspiration?s=09