Jump to content

liverpoolsno9

Registered
  • Posts

    4,741
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by liverpoolsno9

  1. 3 minutes ago, Lee909 said:

     

    Didn't think either were and would be fuming if it was given against us. 

     

    Diaz got his shot away as the challenge went in. The issue was Nunez just standing around

     

    The handball looked body onto his arm which is down. 

     

    Seen them given but neither are for me


    That’s a foul anywhere else in the pitch, makes absolutely no difference if the challenge was after the shot. A foul is a foul is a foul. Your theory doesn’t add up, you can break his fucking leg as long as he gets his shot off 1st? 

  2. 4 minutes ago, chrisbonnie said:

    Haven't seen it mentioned earlier. 

     

    Am I the only one that thought we where denied a stone wall penalty when two utd players cleaned Diaz out of it? 

     

    Granted, Diaz didn't have control of the ball, but a foul's a foul 


    Stonewall. There was one like it yesterday too, the attacker gets the ball & is then wiped out but because the ‘chance’ has gone, apparently if the attacker gets the ball 1st you can take them out at the neck & it’s not a foul

  3. Cheeky cunts. They’re seeing their arse coz Burnley won’t let them take their flags & banners into the ground! Burnley played by the rules & were relegated whilst these cunts cheated & they’re up in arms because they won’t let them take their banners in! Always the fucking victims

    • Haha 2
  4. 1 hour ago, Judge said:

    You can talk to me when you have an independent opinion for the first time on this forum, Einstein. Until then you can fuck off.

     

    I will explain the obvious fact to you only this time:

    the outcome of this match was NOT caused by genious substitutions from Jurgen, it was caused by the sending off. There is no way we had won this match without the red card.

     

    It was right to put Elliot on anyway, and he got space to make an impact because we were 11-10. It was horrendous to take Nunez and Szlobo off, but Jurgen got out of jail because of the red card.

     

    I am not expecting you to understand this, though.

     

    Ok,thank you. You absolute twat

  5. 1 hour ago, skend04 said:

     

    He always seems overwhelmed when starting but as a sub he's a completely different player.

    We’ve started every single game shit, except Villa. When he’s come on as sub it’s been mostly when we’re chasing the game & the urgency has intensified perhaps if the team shows the intensity from the off he’d look better?. We have to a goal down before we give a shit. If he actually starts in a team that has intensity from the off & is on the front foot he’d look better. 

  6. they might be struggling with fatigue but the attitude fucking stinks. At least the fresh legs oh Harvey & Jones will give us a bit of impetus. Coz what we’ve just seen is unacceptable. Like they’re going thru the motions. Palace tactics maybe anti football but pass pass pass pass, sideway, backwards isn’t gonna break them down, intensity, get down the sides, is. 

  7. Surely we gotta bring someone in in Jan. Konate can’t play 2 or 3 consecutive games, nevermind 2 a week, Gomez injury record isn’t the best & we’re gonna need him as cover for the FBs too. Leaves us with Quensah, he looks very good but if we really wanna be competing for the League you can’t be giving him 5-10 games. And that’s reliant on Virg staying fit too. And don’t wanna see Endo playing CD. Where’s Rhys Williams & Nat Phillips these days. 

  8. On 04/11/2023 at 15:56, Kevin D said:

    According to the commentary during the Forest game, he only has size 7 feet.


    if true, why did we sign him? Like a boxers reach, this is important, especially in midfield trying to break play up, small feet could be the difference of him gaining possession or gifting it. We really need to have a look at this, I know it seems trivial but I know loads of people with small feet & they’re shit. There was a lad with big feet I knew & he went on to have a career for Flint Town. As we know to our cost, a few millimetres can be the difference of being Champions or Runners up.

    • Haha 3
  9. Everton trying to breakaway to form a Super League & 1 of 5 to spearhead the formation of the Prem. With a much bigger cut of TV money compared to the rest. Hypocrites 

     

    During the 1980s, major English clubs had begun to transform into business ventures, applying commercial principles to club administration to maximise revenue. Martin Edwards of Manchester United, Irving Scholar of Tottenham Hotspur, and David Dein of Arsenal were among the leaders in this transformation.[21] The commercial imperative led to the top clubs seeking to increase their power and revenue: the clubs in Division One threatened to break away from the Football League, and in doing so, they managed to increase their voting power and gain a more favourable financial arrangement, taking a 50% share of all television and sponsorship income in 1986.[21] They demanded that television companies should pay more for their coverage of football matches,[22] and revenue from television grew in importance. The Football League received £6.3 million for a two-year agreement in 1986, but by 1988, in a deal agreed with ITV, the price rose to £44 million over four years, with the leading clubs taking 75% of the cash.[23][24] According to Scholar, who was involved in the negotiations of television deals, each of the First Division clubs received only around £25,000 per year from television rights before 1986, this increased to around £50,000 in the 1986 negotiation, then to £600,000 in 1988.[25] The 1988 negotiations were conducted under the threat of ten clubs leaving to form a "super league", but they were eventually persuaded to stay, with the top clubs taking the lion's share of the deal.[23][26][27] The negotiations also convinced the bigger clubs that in order to receive enough votes, they needed to take the whole of First Division with them instead of a smaller "super league".[28] By the beginning of the 1990s, the big clubs again considered breaking away, especially now that they had to fund the cost of stadium upgrade as proposed by the Taylor Report.[29]

    In 1990, the managing director of London Weekend Television (LWT), Greg Dyke, met with the representatives of the "big five" football clubs in England (Manchester United, Liverpool, Tottenham Hotspur, Everton and Arsenal) over a dinner.[30] The meeting was to pave the way for a breakaway from The Football League.[31] Dyke believed that it would be more lucrative for LWT if only the larger clubs in the country were featured on national television and wanted to establish whether the clubs would be interested in a larger share of television rights money.[32] The five clubs agreed with the suggestion and decided to press ahead with it; however, the league would have no credibility without the backing of The Football Association, and so David Dein of Arsenal held talks to see whether the FA were receptive to the idea. The FA did not have an amicable relationship with the Football League at the time and considered it as a way to weaken the Football League's position.[33] The FA released a report in June 1991, Blueprint for the Future of Football, that supported the plan for the Premier League with the FA as the ultimate authority that would oversee the breakaway league.[28]

  10. Another ruling that will just promote inconsistency & subjectivity, more questionable decisions to punish innocent player/teams. Leave the fucking game alone. The enjoyment has been drastically diluted even more so this season, such is the incompetence of the officials. We don’t need to give them anything else to think about. Just make them better. That’ll improve the game more than any other shitty changes. Not totally on board with the new offside ruling either. 

  11. 59 minutes ago, Captain Turdseye said:

    Seems I’ve been banned for saying this to some fella who’d been negging all my posts. 
     

     

    IMG_3573.jpeg

    IMG_3574.jpeg
     

    Overstepped common decency. Hahaha. There’s no way I’m leaving him alone after the ban.

      
     

    Jeez, that post was just awful? overstepped common decency? horrible accusations? And anything goes in the RS thread? The fucking horrible, despicable, forever victim cunts

    • Upvote 2
  12. Follow
     
    The worst thing you can do, ever, bar murder, rape or noncey shit, is piss off a mad bunch of Evertonians. EFC fans will come at you, for months, until they're vindicated. Not apologised to, btw, I mean, properly fucking sorted out. Imagine picking US, to go to war with?
     
     
    ·
    1,049
    Views
     
     
    3
     
    4
     
    24
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    CgOiKjMM_x96.jpg
     
     
    We are a special breed Ade. Special in all ways. On and off the pitch. SD had given us our team back so as supporters we will get SD and his team their 10 points back
    1
     
     
     
    1
     
    47
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Nz7Hvuto_x96.jpg
     
    Too fucking right, Steve. And when they give us the ten back anyways, we'll be fucking 8th.
    • Haha 1
  13. They’re gonna take us down aren’t they? 
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
    7RPyVuhT_x96.jpg
     
    If Everton continue to shine the spotlight on the Premier League they will be investigated and all the corruption around the ESL will be revealed. Liverpool will be in deep deep shit with all the backhanders and corrupt payments made to stop them being kicked out the league
     
    Tough shit whether the Premier League will allow it or not. Liverpool fans are absolutely shitting themselves at the moment in case the Premier League are investigated
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    7RPyVuhT_x96.jpg
     
     
    It could very well expose stuff surrounding the ESL situation and why the clubs involved weren't punished sufficiently enough. All sorts of skeletons at the Premier League
     
     
×
×
  • Create New...