Rico1304

The Gender Pay Gap bot on Twitter doing sterling work.  Whenever a business tweets some bollocks with the # the bot retweets it with their gender pay gap.  The more earnest the original tweet, the higher the gap is.   

4 minutes ago, sir roger said:

 

You have to say that or she'll beat you to death with one hand.

She did say that she was 5’3 and 73 kg when she was 13. 

We had a talk at work this morning by Maggie Alphonsi. She was very good.  

8 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Update on the idea that Bakhmut isn't important :

 

 

Exclusive: Zelensky warns of ‘open road’ through Ukraine’s east if Russia captures Bakhmut, as he resists calls to retreat

Nothing on the execution of the soldier, or the missing children?  
 

‘I just want peace’.  Worra cunt. 

19 minutes ago, skend04 said:

 

You know when people were trying to say panto dames and drag queens aren't the same thing...

 

Can't wait for Rico Et Al Vs The Christmas Panto thread this year. Watch out Sir Ian McKellen.

 

PS. Gay men aren't trans. But when you're down that rabbit hole anything is fair game I guess.

I have no issue with drag queens. But it’s adult entertainment.  Flowjob and ADHD are not Ian McKellan in a dress.  
 

Thank god you told us gay men aren’t trans though. Finger right on the fucking pulse there. 

14 minutes ago, Pidge said:

 

Oh fuck off, you condescending prick. You haven't affected my opinion on whether it's morally discriminatory. You haven't corrected my views on whether it is technically discriminatory under Canadian law, because I haven't formed an opinion in that respect. I've been pretty open and clear about the bounds of my statement and couldn't give a shit about whatever else you want to project that onto.

 

I am allowed to form an opinion on the basic facts of the matter, and share that opinion, just like everyone else on this thread.

 

18 more posts to the big milestone. Maybe you can get another bite and see it through, I'm afraid my part in the final push is over.

Shrugs. 
 

I don’t think I’ll do it.   

35 minutes ago, Pidge said:

Yawn. Too big is too big. "Really fucking big". Obviously, yes, you boring twat.

 

This isn't a complicated point. I stated my opinion that I don't feel that telling that particular individual to turn it in would be discriminatory and illustrated my rationale.

 

I am neither setting Canadian schools policy, nor am I an expert in their law. I couldn't care less about that, but it's boring seeing the constant assumptions about other people's opinions, so for once I thought I would, at least, be clear. 

 

It was mistake to expect a simple statement of opinion to just be taken on board without a pointless, mindless debate about nothing to try and derive some internet points out of the situation. 

And I’ve pointed out why it would be - based on the law in Canada, where it’s happening.  
 

It’s amazing how these things are happening exactly how predicted. 
 

I mean where else other than the GF could you express an opinion, admit you know nothing of the policy, the law, then claim you don’t care and be upset when you are corrected? 

5 minutes ago, Pidge said:

That it would be unprofessional for any teacher to wear giant prosthetic breasts at work? Okay. 

How big is too big?  Define ‘giant’?  What about a woman who loses a breast to say cancer?  Can she wear a prosthetic if she previously had large breasts?  
 

None of this was an issue before affirming men became the law.   
 

How about saying ‘No, just because you say you are a woman it doesn’t mean you are one.’  
 

This court case will shine a light on it.   

1 minute ago, Pidge said:

I said he the other day and one of you lot was moaning about it, today you're moaning that I "won't". As I said would happen then.

 

I made a simple point, I can't understand it for you...

You made a simple but incorrect point.  It’ll be fun to watch it play out.  

17 minutes ago, Pidge said:

I think you missed the bit where I directly stated what I thought should happen if a woman started teaching in giant prosthetic tits, so their legal status has no bearing on my statement.

Ha ha I like the way you won’t say he. 
 

It’s a woman with big tits, who says they are real. Why would you assume they are fake? 

If the objection to this is finally that the teacher has been ‘caught out’ dressing as a man away from the school our very own Pippa Bunce switches between going to work dressed as a bloke or woman depending how he feels.  He’s that good as a part time woman he’s won numerous awards. 

29 minutes ago, Pidge said:

If they were going through hormone treatment and developed some Meatloaf-from-Fight-Club cushions and then were sacked, it could be considered discrimination. If a women were to start coming to work wearing oversized prosthetic breasts, I'd imagine someone would at least have a word. Same should apply to that case, regardless of what gender they, or you, consider them. Accepting that is not a reasonable adjustment.

I think the bit you’re missing is that he IS a woman under the law.  This type of bollocks, whilst predicted by anyone who has ever thought about it, wasn’t predicted by the law makers as that wouldn’t have have met the ‘TWAW’ standards.  So when you hear people saying ‘TWAW’ this is EXACTLY where it leads.  Along with blokes in women’s prisons and hospital wards.  

Scandalous 

33 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

Which part?

The bit where the women have to wear a black hijab.  

9 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

RICO!! - Drag - in pharmacies ffs.

 

A new law in Iran has been issued by regime which forces female pharmacists to only wear black veil (any other type of hijab or color is prohibited) in workplace, as a response male pharmacists are wearing it as well to mock this law.

 

Just more misogyny isn’t it.  Which is what woman have been saying all along.  

On 03/03/2023 at 17:03, Rico1304 said:

Hes doing ok at the moment. As his hair has fallen out 7 of his pals have shaved their heads today and raised a load of money.  BBC North West were at the school today to film it.   I think it’s on at 6:30pm. 

Well that worked.  David Sullivan must have seen it on telly and donated £5k.  Up to £21k now.  

Remember how concerns about Tavistock and the whistleblower were just hand waved away?  Well the Guardian have finally got around to reviewing the book about the place.  
 

It’s not pretty.  
 

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/feb/19/time-to-think-by-hannah-barnes-review-what-went-wrong-at-gids

30 minutes ago, Harry's Lad said:

We had to nip to Asda and while we were queueing, there was a little girl, I would imagine not quite 2 in a supermarket trolley seat who gave me the biggest smile.

 

I smiled back, said hello and waved, she hid behind her mum then reappeared with a big beaming smile then hid again playing hide and seek.

 

This went on for a minute or so before her mum's shopping was packed and then off she went still smiling.

That smile would have won her the parish, a beautiful child.

Absolutely made my day bless her.

 

I'm getting too soft.

 

At least you weren’t getting hard. 

1 minute ago, VERBAL DIARRHEA said:

Where is his proof of Gigantomasia, his rubber tits. 

If a woman presented with massive tits and said it was gigantomasia no one would bat an eyelid.  She could still do her job.   He’ll say he’s been treated differently than a woman due to being trans and therefore discriminated against.   This is where ‘TWAW’ leads to.  

4 minutes ago, VERBAL DIARRHEA said:

Canadian guy with the Cupid Stunt boobs saying it’s Gigantomastia the fucking fruit loop. What is his end game?

He’s a woman, he says he’s a woman. If a real woman said she had the condition would the school demand proof?  He’s going to sue them and win.  

Just about teaching them to read…

https://twitter.com/_k_f_p_/status/1623662583499616256?s=46&t=wTmhxkVCGgzL1q3_vvfmTA

Really?

Read this thread and tell me it makes sense.  
 

Harmless fun. 
 

https://elizamondegreen.substack.com/p/this-is-what-no-debate-looks-like