Rico1304

2 hours ago, Pidge said:

 

They will still be available under certain conditions, which they would not be if they were deemed unsafe.

As part of research, or continued for kids already on them.  
 

Edit - if the research says they are either unsafe or ineffective what would be your reaction to them being prescribed without evidence? 

On 20/02/2024 at 12:43, Pidge said:

How would hitting a woman outside of your household be 'domestic abuse'? It would be assault then and now regardless of who did it. It's also not what's happened in the clip, the player in white has the ball and the player in black commits a foul trying to tie it up, getting whipped around as they fight for the ball. The refs calls it early to try and avoid the confrontation, should probably have considered a flagrant or tech if they feel the player in white is being overly aggressive after the whistle. Being ejected a few times to protect players should put a stop to it, especially if it starts costing them games.

 

Not convinced that individual should be allowed in the game in the first place, as I don't know anything about them, but also not seeing any evidence of one player abusing or assaulting three people.

The player in white (who has a full beard) has now been suspended from a rowing club for sexually harassment after comments made in the female changing rooms. 
 

If you wait long enough…

1 hour ago, Pidge said:

No lies in that thread, as far as what you've posted. Said a while ago that it seems some people are more interested in leveraging the report to make points about things not in the report, than actually seeing improvement across these services.

Lies by omission.  
 

Cass can’t say PBs are dangerous because there’s a lack of data and research.  In that scenario, where any normal person would demand proof of safety BEFORE giving them to children this is being framed as a win!?  TRAs have been pushing them for years, that was called out for years but anyone questioning it was labelled a bigot. 

7 hours ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Double down on what?

 

I haven't read the Cass report.  I know a lot of people are making a lot of noise about it (and I'd bet my favourite bollock that most of them haven't read it either).  I came across Hilary Cass answering questions about it, so I correctly judged that it fits the brief of this thread title.

 

Then you started talking about "senior Scottish politicians" that nobody outside Scotland has heard of.

Nope.  That’s not what happened.  You found a TA groups interpretation of an interview quoted by Billy Bragg.  No direct quotes.  You ignored the fact the woman has been told she’s not safe to travel on public transport. 
 

Read the report, then you don’t have to rely on anyone else. 
 

You’ve never heard of Kite before yesterday but believe them. It’s not my fault you haven’t heard of these people.  Yesterday it was “nobody”, now it’s nobody you’ve heard of. Goalposts shifting all the time. 

1 minute ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I really haven't missed Rico.  A decent troll should at least be interesting.

You’d think the Cass report would bring some humility.  Even if it was ‘Perhaps they were right about the blockers at least’. Nope.  Double down. 

Amazing woman. She should rule the world.  

Zack Polanski too - senior Green politician. 

40 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Yes. Literally in my following post.  Keep up.

So Ross Greer, a senior Scottish politician.  

4 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Are they in this thread with you now?

So “literally nobody”.  Changing your mind on that yet? 

1 hour ago, Gnasher said:

 

 

 

It's stuff like the above the real reason some pretend to take offence at twitter, they'd rather it be left unsaid. 

 

 

Don’t think they could harvest a brain for you? 

5 hours ago, Gnasher said:

 

But what about my leccy bill?

So if the U.K. supported the vulnerable this winter and made sure they weren’t impacted by any rise in energy prices you’d be all behind Ukraine?  
 

If Labour Nationalised energy retail I honestly think you’d explode.  

F 

Just now, Gnasher said:

 

Leave me put of your phobias toryrunty. Theirs a good lad.

I have no idea what that means.  Don’t bother clarifying though.  

24 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

You being pedantic?

 

OK.  I never claimed it, nor did Billy Bragg, nor did The Kite Trust.

 

The closest I've seen to anyone claiming that was you, in your comeback post last week.

How about senior Scottish politicians? 

It’s also worth noting that the Kite posts have been community noted.  

18 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Literally nobody claimed that, you self-parody.

Really?  “Literally nobody claimed that”. Are you very sure about that?  
 

6 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Most predictable response ever.  

 

Apart from the suggestion that anti-trans activists are being disingenuous (Heaven forbid you and your weird mates should ever do such a thing!) Billy Bragg and the Kite Trust aren't claiming anything there: every relevant word is from Dr Hilary Cass, who (I assume) has read and understood the fucking Cass Report.

Cass is an anti-trans activist?  Wow. 
 

You didn’t even read what you posted did you?  Gnasheresque. 

1 minute ago, TD_LFC said:

Performative outrage is performative.

(Don’t go on the Palestine thread - you’ll fucking combust)

3 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

Stop getting the Cass Report wrong....

 

....Dr Cass......

You read the article where she condemns the misrepresentation of the report? The one where she’s been advised not to travel on the bus?  
 

Just read the report.  
 

Edit: this is one thing that always surprises me about this place.  Court judgments, reports like this are usually available online but noone ever reads them.   

17 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

 

 

Billy fucking Bragg!!!! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.  
 

The Kite Trust don’t publish the report do they?  Just read it for yourself.  Don’t take their view of Cass - just read the words.  
 

pathetic as usual. 

Even the Guardian coming around.  Would this have been published a few years ago?
 

https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/commentisfree/2024/apr/21/we-are-ashamed-of-role-psychology-played-gender-care-observer-letters

11 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

Lay off the juice yer mixed up tranny. 

Not emulsion?  Or perhaps a hearty gloss?

23 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

The Ukrainian aid is fine  Not impressed at all with yet more funding for Israel. 

Why lie?  Or heave you not received orders on this one? 

Excellent news.  
 

Comrade Gnasher must be devastated.  

https://x.com/billmaher/status/1781526083210502503?s=46&t=wTmhxkVCGgzL1q3_vvfmTA

Big day for women in the US, Title IX interpretation from Biden’s government that the sex protections are now gender protections.  So federally funded schools and universities can no longer provide single sex spaces, bathrooms, changing rooms, scholarships.  Progress…