Isn't it about time he was considered first choice right back ahead of Glen Johnson?
Maybe I'm wrong, but he seems, frankly, just better at it.
I've wondered a few times whether I was too soft on Kelly, Spearing too for that matter, because they are young, local lads; while being too hard on the likes of Johnson, Carroll, Downing, Henderson etc because they're easy targets - being English but not Scouse and incredibly expensive.
I'm starting to think that Kelly in particular though is just plain better than his direct competitor, Johnson.
Is he better, or am I just picking the Scouser ahead of the Londoner?