Jump to content

Gnasher

Season Ticket Holder
  • Posts

    26,225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Gnasher

  1. Mourdant would mean serious trouble for Labour and Starmer. Very assured and the opposite of Bunter. The rest of the candidates belong in a glue factory.
  2. Yeah i feel the same. As Numero says we don't have all the info on that vote and their may have been reasons but at face value it just looks terrible. When you've got the country's main blogger/author/protester on food poverty already on the case it's impossible to not conclude that Labour have dropped another bollock here.
  3. Not everyone to the left of Change UK is a grifter Numero, however many coats of paint you lash over them.
  4. How can people seriously defend this shit?
  5. Maybe they do so because they disagree with the direction the Labour party is going. Labour has created the crowd with this issue as they did with Lammy and the strikes at Heathrow.
  6. Jack Monroe was the main link i provided. She's one of the main voices on food poverty in this country. You seem to paint any people who are critical of Labour/Starmer as crazy lefty's.
  7. I was referring to the optics of Rachel Reeves acceptance of a free meal from Lloyd's bankers and a few weeks later Labour blocking free school meals for kids
  8. Their is no indication Labour has a better plan around the corner and people like Jack Monroe are not "left wing media" looking to criticise for criticisms sake.
  9. I don't know about that but I do know they don't vote to feed them.
  10. 10 bonus points for getting Corbyn into the conversation.
  11. Cost of living crisis. So in the past month or so we've had a Labour front bencher accepting a free meal from a bank that received government subsidies at the Chelsea flower show. Labour suggesting its MPs shouldn't be seen on picket lines and Labour members of the House of Lords blocking children receiving free school meals.
  12. I don't. A lot of people need handouts, are on Universal Credit and use foodbanks anyway. Thay are almost telling parents we are pulling the rug from under you as you should aspire to better. Just offer the parents and kids the fucking food. The vouchers are not compulsory, it should be up to them.
  13. Needs must unfortunately. We'd all like foodbanks to be fucked off etc and parents to not have to rely on benefits but an awful lot of parents are on Universal Credit and that free meal would have been a godsend to a lot of children. Labour's abstention looks bizarre.
  14. I've got a lot more time for her than the shadow chancellor.
  15. Here's the reason given not to back free school meals for benefit claimants. You should have more aspiration and aim higher? It hasn't gone down that well tbh.
  16. I've already told you. She's promised to bring down the country's debt. On the back of an uncertain economic future, especially with the fallout caused by Russia in Ukraine. No need for it, reeks of more pandering to the tory lights. Anyway you crack on and enjoy yourself, or go crack one off if you want.
  17. Id suggest the country's debt is not people's most pressing concern considering the war in Ukraine and the current financial climate tbh.
  18. Here's Rach with a bucketful of ice cold water. Shame see can't stay in Chelsea permanently. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/12/labour-to-pledge-ironclad-discipline-with-public-finances?s=09
  19. Well in Starmer, he was good there and a good first question.
  20. She's the one Labour needs to fear, she's miles better than the other candidates.
  21. Truss for me, daft as a brush and demented. Will fill her cabinet with the same old Johnson headbangers like Rees Mogg and Nads although we'd be taking a big gamble on the public voting her out before she declares war on France.
×
×
  • Create New...