He did and we are not. He also said his main concern is winning (fair enough) the next election and gave that as one of his reasons for dropping his former commitments, ie, taking energy/rail back into public ownership. That claim is unfounded. As ive already stated taking energy/rail etc into public ownership is a popular policy. The backtracking on that and other commitments makes him sound disingenuous.
Anyway we seem to be going around in circles so i will leave it for others to make their own conclusions.