Horus

The tight fuckers would actually love that.

Me when we buy Thiago and sell our only midfielder that doesn't get injured to pay for him:

The Billy Beane noise worries me. He's been scrambling around fund raising, so the minute a purchase would be complete, he doesn't have that money, so whichever club he ends up with are going to be H&G'd. That said, preparing to sell, and selling are 2 different things in this financial climate, so I don't think Klopp was referencing a potential sale. More likely he was on about us selling a load of players.

I genuinely think they're in the process of preparing to sell. Nothing left for them to achieve, we're at max value this instance, city screwing FFP, and the more money they can pay off our loan debt - which is owed to them, the more profit they will clear when they're ready. Only way their approach really makes sense.

Tom Werner in 2019: “If they recommend someone then we will support that recommendation. Our role at FSG is to support the manager and the people around him in the best way that we possibly can.”

And a lower net spend by the end of the window than most of the league.

The FSG Echo the day after he signs either for us or someone else: The Thiago saga proves FSG got it right.

Our recruitment team whenever there is a young goalkeeper waiting to be snapped up.

The bastards. Very disrespectful to UnitedScarves City.

In that case they've only sold one left back, so they probably need to get 3 more off the wage bill before being in position to possibly or possibly not bid for one.

Leicester probably just need to sell some right backs before completing the deal.

Havertz agreed. £72m up front.

You called me an anti semite out of nowhere, on a football forum. Examine your life, cunt.

I have no idea what the fuck you're on about. You're a fucking mental little prick. You backed your argument into a corner so came out with anti semite bullshit, like the fucking cunt you are.

You are one serious mong. Go fuck yourself you sad little cunt.

So last summer paid for Kirby? I need evidence for this, and I also don't want to see kirby dragged up in another 12 months as a recurring excuse, because I've seen kirby given as a reason we're not spending now. Chelsea and city are still governed by the same FFP rules that we are, and if anything, after getting away with one, UEFA will be all over them. Owners aren't allowed to throw in transfer funds, but if only we were undertaking a construction project that would allow our owners to do this, whilst at the same time protecting their long term profit margins. Hmmm, if only.

Crisis averted.

I'm drowning

Help me

How do I delete posts?

But then not spending last summer should have guaranteed we had the cash ready for Werner. Spending on top is what we always used to do, and what the mancs always used to do. I'd say that the 2 biggest dynasties in Modern English footie are probably the model to follow, and not the arsenal model of selling players and never replacing them, but I'm a cynical, glass half empty kind a guy at the best of times. It's going to be nearly impossible to replace our squad on the back of sales at the ages they will be over the next couple of seasons.

I will cage on those figures, as I took them from anfield online.

It's not just this one window though. What happened last summer? We're all old enough to remember Arsenal enjoying similar success as they stopped buying players, and look how long it's taken them to get back approaching a strategy. I'm sure their fans were just as relaxed as most of our fan base, as they had teir est manager of all time in post.

I agree, so let me ask you if you believe we are maximising one of these rare short windows into challenging that we'll have.