Haha, got it.
The whole thing has been a seriously sharp case of Occam's Razor. Cases, hospitalisations and deaths started dropping after the lockdown started because transmission was reduced, not because everyone had either had it or these magical T-cells sprung into action.
Cases, hospitalisations and deaths started rising after the lockdown ended because transmission increased, not because of the test suddenly detecting colds or increased testing or whatever bullshit reach Toby Young's blog just came up with.
Sometimes those correlation/ causation graphs are right and not just a funny coincidence. Usually it's when things are tightly coupled and fucking obvious, like people not spreading a disease and all the indicators for that disease reducing.
It's been brilliant for the grifters and conspiracy theorists though- there's 4-6 weeks between something being actioned and then seeing the results of it.
Inevitably, the next couple of scenarios will happen- cases, hospitalisations and deaths will continue to rise post the new lockdown and there'll be a pile on saying it doesn't work. When it finally does kick in (and to be honest with schools still open, that's going to take some time), we'll be back to the previous nonsense about it having infected everyone already, numbers were going down even before the lockdown, T-cells, numbers were faked, tests weren't accurate etc. The government will relax things for Christmas and we'll start all over again. @Sugar Ape outlined it perfectly before.