-
Posts
36,296 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Articles
Forums
Store
Posts posted by Rico1304
-
-
3 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:
Calling you a weird cunt with a fetish for drag queens and trans people isn't sticking up for rapists, calling the crime heinous isn't sticking up for rapists, saying there's nothing to suggest this 15 year old was a drag queen at the time he committed that crime isn't sticking up for rapists, not getting into bed with the S*n isn't sticking up for rapists.
But do carry on.
Oh you can call me what you want, by now you should realise I couldn’t give a flying fuck what you or anyone else thinks.
You went into bat for a rapist who subsequently went on to work with kids despite being banned from doing so. Somehow when he’s killed he gets a hero’s funeral, with the only real reason is that he was a drag Queen. So we’ve got a sex offending drag Queen lauded.
-
6 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:
Was definitely the funeral you have your arse in your hand about, it's obvious from the original post.
Definitely wasn't the headline about a drag queen raping people that caused the blood to surge south and for you to rush to post it without reading the source or the facts.
You have no idea what you are on about. I think I even mentioned this when it happened weeks ago.
Plus the post comes the day after that strange post about no trans predators being found on the telly show.You keep sticking up for rapists. It’s a cracking look and doesn’t at all make you look a bit weird.
-
3 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:
My objection is throwing in with the S*n's dog whistling John Anderton.
Seems a little bit precog to be declaring victory in an abuse case because a child who committed a crime grew up to become a drag queen.
Really? When he actively sort out a job working with kids? The courts thought him sufficiently dangerous to prevent him access to children. He then gets a hero’s funeral because he dressed as a woman. Don’t you find that a bit fucking weird? -
10 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:
What part of it was a heinous crime suggests I thought it's OK?
My only dispute is throwing in with the dog whistling of the S*n trying to link it as a crime by a Drag Queen.
I know you have this weird lob on for Drag Queens and trans people and see yourself as the saviour of women everywhere, is it over compensation for being a bigger risk to women you know than they will be?
he was a drag Queen. If he hadn’t been do you think Cardiff would have closed off streets for his fucking funeral?
If I’ve got this right your objection is he wasn’t a drag Queen when he raped the kids. Strange really. In fact unbelievable and something you don’t know.
I couldn’t give a fuck about drag queens. Do what you want but it seems strange putting on a dress forgives you for raping someone.
-
11 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:
So I specifically said it was a heinous crime, didn't throw in with the S*n mis reporting, agreed with you that it's relevant to the crime he committed and that is going to bat for rapists?
You're a crank.
So you were agreeing? Ha ha ha ha. -
9 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:
Agreed, it is relevant to the offense he was convicted of.
Going into bat for rapists again. It’s so very strange. -
20 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:
In this case it doesn't appear to have.
Sounds like he was 15/16 at the time (makes the crime no less heinous) and not a drag queen which seems to have been left out of the Reduxx (via the S*n's) reporting.
Whether the future crime of being a Drag Queen is enough is for others to decide I suppose.
What about the conviction for trying to work with kids? Surely that’s relevant?
-
Farage accusing Lineker of spreading hate.
-
47 minutes ago, Nelly-Matip said:
Horrible, disingenuous cunts, them.Nowhere in that letter does Bernstein mention I had my finger up his PA’s bum.
- 1
-
-
It never happens!
-
7 hours ago, Strontium said:
A "conspiracy theory" that extends to pointing out that he's already in dispute with the BBC over something else.
That’s a fact. The conspiracy is that he’s manufactured a row with the BBC in order to improve his position in the case.
-
1 minute ago, Nelly-Matip said:
Yeah, doofuses.
Wake up. It’s all so transparent what Lineker is up to. Ignore the simple explanation that he shows compassion and concern towards refugees and, accordingly, would naturally speak out against any sort of dangerous rhetoric being used against this group of people. It’s clearly not that. It’s all about the money and getting one over HMRC.
Gary is playing a very cynical long game to achieve his desired outcome. He even conned a couple of refugees by pretending he was a decent human being and offering them a roof over their head when, in reality, they were just useful pawns in his seedy little tax scam.
Occam’s razor.
Weird how 2 people who usually laugh at conspiracy theories seem to be pushing one here. You should read Sharmers book.
-
1 minute ago, Captain Willard said:
You obviously haven’t met a tax lawyer specialising in avoidance.
One of my best friends is a senior partner at Latham and Watkins. He deals with people whose wealth would make your eyes water and is currently writing the tax laws for a Middle Eastern country. I spoke to him about this.- 1
-
3 minutes ago, Strontium said:
So you don't think the small matter of 5 million quid may not lead him to think: fuck the BBC and their impartiality rules? Okay then.
Ok, so you think he’s setting his own defence strategy for his tax dispute? You think, off his own back, he’s decided the best way to win his case isn’t challenging the actual law, which a very experiencedjudge will rule on but to play out a stunt?
£5m is a lot of money, it’s probably to him about maybe a quarter of his net worth. If he loses he’ll be able to earn that £5m back in about 2 years.
-
3 minutes ago, Colonel Bumcunt said:
I don't see how Lineker returns without saying something to camera, like he often does, about all this. Which of course the BBC won't want him to do, and will likely result in him breaching rules on revealing internal corporate matters. But I just don't think he'd be able to help himself.
It’s not live.
-
1 minute ago, Strontium said:
This is a guy who pocketed £1.6m from Qatar to front their sports coverage. You're crazy if you think his financial dispute with the BBC is playing no part here.
No. Absolutely not. In fact completely ridiculous.
-
The idea that he’s doing this (‘this’ being standing up for what he believes in and calling out these cunts for being cunts) to strengthen his legal case is about as mental as you can get. Imagine a tax lawyer saying ‘Right Gary, send the tweet now!’ Mental.
- 1
- 2
- 4
-
31 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:
Here is what is becoming clear - you believe that men in drag, or bondage gear or imaginary cricket coaches twerking are not as likely but actually more likely to be nonces - otherwise you wouldn't keep going through this.
Which is either a fact or a bias. We both know it is not a fact.
If Draq Queen story hours are rapidly increasing in public spaces as you say that would mean they are popular wouldn't it?
You do realise people are reading your shite don’t you? I mean you’re actually writing this stuff down.
From insisting men in women’s prisons aren’t dangerous to men who want to twerk in front of kids aren’t either.
Mmm. I’m getting a word.
-
4 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:
As above - they would be just as likely to be nonces as their current coaches. Regardless of any twerking.
Not sure youth coaching is a good place to try to make a point about drag - they have their own longstanding issues.
Ha ha ha. So you wouldn’t have any issue with a cricket coach who insisted on twerking to the kids?
Hard drive check.
-
3 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:
No - ffs we have already said that an hour ago. By your theory no men should be aloud ( heh) to read to children. dressed however.
As I said before - it is not about the safety of the children - which is something you continue to point out.
It’s so disingenuous it’s hilarious. Anyone interacting with kids in any official capacity in the U.K. has to be DFBS checked. I had to have one when I was captain of our cricket club. Now imagine if a load of blokes volunteered to coach the kids cricket but would only do it if they could be dressed as women and insisted on twerking between overs. -
2 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:
Oh, so their parents are bringing them to those?
Fucking hell. This is like pulling fucking teeth.
You may think this is making you look clever but it’s really fucking tedious. Are this group of men, who are all of a sudden massively interested in reading to kids, whilst dressed as women less likely to be nonces?
- 2
-
Just now, Rico1304 said:
I fucking hope so.
And this is mainly happening outside of schools.
-
Just now, TheHowieLama said:
Are there any school administrators like you?
I fucking hope so.
Transgender stuff - what's going on?
in GF - General Forum
Posted
Are you in the US? Because your prisons are fuck all like the prisons in the U.K.
Men should never be in women’s prisons.