Duplicitous, lying, snivelling fucking cockroach.
Basically threatened the speaker to put Labour's amendment in.
Hoyle is a gobshite and needs legging.
But Starmer is a dangerous authoritarian twat.
And now Starmer is telling Labour to abstain because the SNP have used the term collective punishment.
Despite it being blindingly fucking obvious that's what Israel have done.
Dear me.
Because they're all in Labour hoping they can move it leftwards.
Sharon Graham has the right idea just concentrate on small scale issues and build from that.
By the way Section is absolutely right about a lot of what he says and Starmer is just playing the game. Where we differ is that I don't believe that Starmer has any core belief in anything. Even Blair had his education and health reforms, that he made no secret of and stuck to.
There's not a thing from Starmer that leads me to believe it's not power for power's sake.
The irony of going after the Blairite wing of the party.
That said Starmer said lasting ceasefire not immediate ceasefire.
He'll only say that once everyone in Gaza is dead and the US allow him to say it.
Most wouldn't see past Corbyn to his policies.
Taken in isolation though and separate policy from the man, then his 2017/19 manifesto was exceptionally popular.
Choosing Labour to replace the tories is akin to replacing Hodgson with Rodgers.
They'll look younger and have a snazzier suit and be easier on the eye. But in the end they'll still win fuck all, get on your nerves and when you finally take a look at their 180 page dossier on how to improve the economy it just boils down to 180 pages of how to reduce benefits for the poorest in society.
But at least they aren't the tories.
Corbyn's policies were and are popular unfortunately the public hated the person delivering them.
Starmer is not going to miraculously move to the left once in power.
In fact all empirical evidence points to the opposite.
True, maybe if he'd been a lying duplicitous twat who'd say and do anything to achieve power, but with no actual policies other than more austerity he may have got in.
It's the larger principal, there is a rizla paper between Labour & Tories now.
But people's desperation to remove the tories is blinding them to this fact. Even as we speak the only policy that Labour have left to differentiate themselves from the tories is the workers rights one. Which is now in the process of being diluted or worse abandoned.
Whatever you say about Corbyn his policies were popular and he was an opposition.