Boris Johnson

[Red Phoenix]

On Eurovision 2023 :

 

“It is a year away, it is going to be fine by the time the Eurovision Song Contest comes round and I hope the Ukrainians get it.”

 

[Section_31]

Wouldn't be surprised if Johnson is passing intel from his Ukraine trips to his Russian mates, I'm not even joking.

[Gnasher]

On 16/06/2022 at 14:30, Arniepie said:

Rwanda, Brexit, a collapsing economy,wages collapsing.record number of applications for free school meals,Cost of living crises...thank god he is getting all the big decisions right.

 

These calls they keep repeating he got right were either nothing to do with him or no brainers anyway.

 

Ukraine was obvious, how could he do anything different when one country invades another?  Same as every other country bar Belarus. 

 

The Vaccine rollout was initially a success because of our scientists and health service. The EU was initially slow because Ursula's the European Liz Truss and the logistical nightmare of organisation between so many countries however once they got their act together they stormed past England anyway. All Johnson and the Tories saw was a opportunity to make money, they didn't give a fuck about the death rate.

 

When it came to getting the covid rollout right Wales lead the world. Must have been that sensible left wing socialism stuff thats so terrifying. I remember the then  Welsh health secretary Vaughan Getting absolutely tearing into a BBC journalist over the below report suggesting Wales owed their success to 'taking a chance" as he rightly pointed out the article couldn't be further from the truth, the reason the rollout operation in Wales was so successful was because unlike England Drakeford "left nothing to chance'

 

 "Covid vaccination rollout: How is Wales leading the UK and the world? - BBC News" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-57270903.amp

 

 

 

[Barrington Womble]

35 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

Wouldn't be surprised if Johnson is passing intel from his Ukraine trips to his Russian mates, I'm not even joking.

Even if he's doing it without knowing..I remember listening to a podcast about trump some time ago where they talked about how trump as a Russian asset for decades - I can't remember who it was, but it was an ex-head of CIA in Russia if I recall correctly. It was not a case of he was an agent, he was just targeted as an asset because he was massive loudmouth dickhead who had loads of connections and they could use the shit he dropped without knowing it, so the Russians stayed close and befriended him. And they reckon that was the reason Putin got all the bots on the go to get behind him once he was standing for president. It was a gift too good to be true, because they knew he wouldn't keep his mouth shut as president and would continue to give up secrets after being president (I believe the yanks have some weird thing where ex-presidents still get briefed on top secret material). 

[Section_31]

17 minutes ago, Barrington Womble said:

Even if he's doing it without knowing..I remember listening to a podcast about trump some time ago where they talked about how trump as a Russian asset for decades - I can't remember who it was, but it was an ex-head of CIA in Russia if I recall correctly. It was not a case of he was an agent, he was just targeted as an asset because he was massive loudmouth dickhead who had loads of connections and they could use the shit he dropped without knowing it, so the Russians stayed close and befriended him. And they reckon that was the reason Putin got all the bots on the go to get behind him once he was standing for president. It was a gift too good to be true, because they knew he wouldn't keep his mouth shut as president and would continue to give up secrets after being president (I believe the yanks have some weird thing where ex-presidents still get briefed on top secret material). 

John sweeney was going on about it a while back. There's a valley in Italy where the oligarchs hang out and that slippery cunt Johnson put in the lords took him there to his villa and his dad, a former KGB chief with links to Putin, met him there for a 'party' where there were loads of birds or something. Johnson was foreign secretary at the time and ditched his security team.

 

It was supposed to be around the time of the Salisbury poisonings and the insinuation was that he'd soemhwow given them an insight into blighty's stomach (or lack of) of reprisals.

 

This is why I don't truck all this faux patriotism these twats in his party or who vote for him like to peddle, if they were genuine 'patriots' - whatever that means these days - he'd be in a stockade.

 

[Barrington Womble]

31 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

John sweeney was going on about it a while back. There's a valley in Italy where the oligarchs hang out and that slippery cunt Johnson put in the lords took him there to his villa and his dad, a former KGB chief with links to Putin, met him there for a 'party' where there were loads of birds or something. Johnson was foreign secretary at the time and ditched his security team.

 

It was supposed to be around the time of the Salisbury poisonings and the insinuation was that he'd soemhwow given them an insight into blighty's stomach (or lack of) of reprisals.

 

This is why I don't truck all this faux patriotism these twats in his party or who vote for him like to peddle, if they were genuine 'patriots' - whatever that means these days - he'd be in a stockade.

 

It's absolutely clear Johnson is not a patriot. He cares only for himself. I'm sure there are plenty of stupid people who vote for him believing they are doing so for patriotic reasons and he is a patriot. 

[Bruce Spanner]

Well, ain't it peachy to have a friend like Uncle Rup...

 

 

Worth reading the whole story, but in short an amazing scoop, confirmed by several key people in quotes, gets written and put in the early edition, but gets pulled before full run printing.

 

All above board, one assumes?

 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

 

[Bjornebye]

 I thing on the daily Mail about it. Just some consistent stories about Harry and William ….. 

 

 

[Bruce Spanner]

Someone may have, allegedly, taken out a super injunction about a story which may have been  in the first edition press, which subsequently disappeared without explanation.

 

I’d assume this, alleged, person would have far more to do at the minute given the state of the country at present.

 

But hey-ho, Britain 2022 is a fucking hoot.

[Bjornebye]

 

 

 

[Arniepie]

On 18/06/2022 at 12:20, Gnasher said:

 

These calls they keep repeating he got right were either nothing to do with him or no brainers anyway.

 

Ukraine was obvious, how could he do anything different when one country invades another?  Same as every other country bar Belarus. 

 

The Vaccine rollout was initially a success because of our scientists and health service. The EU was initially slow because Ursula's the European Liz Truss and the logistical nightmare of organisation between so many countries however once they got their act together they stormed past England anyway. All Johnson and the Tories saw was a opportunity to make money, they didn't give a fuck about the death rate.

 

When it came to getting the covid rollout right Wales lead the world. Must have been that sensible left wing socialism stuff thats so terrifying. I remember the then  Welsh health secretary Vaughan Getting absolutely tearing into a BBC journalist over the below report suggesting Wales owed their success to 'taking a chance" as he rightly pointed out the article couldn't be further from the truth, the reason the rollout operation in Wales was so successful was because unlike England Drakeford "left nothing to chance'

 

 "Covid vaccination rollout: How is Wales leading the UK and the world? - BBC News" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-57270903.amp

 

 

 

One of the biggest myths going that covid was some sort of success. 

Apart from the vaccine it an utter disaster and a lesson in corruption  and ineptness. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

12 hours ago, Bjornebye said:

 

 

 

Success?

[PestiRed]

9 hours ago, Bruce Spanner said:

Someone may have, allegedly, taken out a super injunction about a story which may have been  in the first edition press, which subsequently disappeared without explanation.

 

I’d assume this, alleged, person would have far more to do at the minute given the state of the country at present.

 

But hey-ho, Britain 2022 is a fucking hoot.

Johnson can’t afford a super-injunction so who put up up the cash for that? Goldsmith?

[Jimmy Hills Chin]

7 hours ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Success?

He kept at least some of his hair.

[Section_31]

I see the government aren't bothering to engage with the unions over the rail strike at all, relying on their mates in the media to vilify them instead - some cancer doctor on GMTV at the moment talking about it'll be impacted, delays and death and whatnot, and how - just for shits and giggles - a lot of cancer nurses get paid less than railway workers.

 

That of course is railway workers' fault.

 

'should we make this kind of strike illegal?'

 

Here it comes boy'o.

[Bruce Spanner]

2 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

I see the government aren't bothering to engage with the unions over the rail strike at all, relying on their mates in the media to vilify them instead - some cancer doctor on GMTV at the moment talking about it'll be impacted, delays and death and whatnot, and how - just for shits and giggles - a lot of cancer nurses get paid less than railway workers.

 

That of course is railway workers' fault.

 

'should we make this kind of strike illegal?'

 

Here it comes boy'o.

 

THey are looking at removing the 'no agency workers to replace striking workers' brought in by Heath.

 

Scahpps was also trying his arm with the 'don't strike yourselves unemployed line' over the weekend.

 

Yet still they refuse to engage with the unions as 'they don't get involved in these employer/employee disputes'

 

They are responsible for this, you can see it from space, and all so they might get a bump in polling by flogging the sowing division card to a slow and painful death.

 

Cunts.

[Barrington Womble]

14 hours ago, Bruce Spanner said:

Someone may have, allegedly, taken out a super injunction about a story which may have been  in the first edition press, which subsequently disappeared without explanation.

 

I’d assume this, alleged, person would have far more to do at the minute given the state of the country at present.

 

But hey-ho, Britain 2022 is a fucking hoot.

A super injunction is the only thing that makes sense as you'd expect the mirror and the guardian to be going with the story, even if it was only a story about a story. I've just had a look on the guardian website and I can't spot anything 

27 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

THey are looking at removing the 'no agency workers to replace striking workers' brought in by Heath.

 

Scahpps was also trying his arm with the 'don't strike yourselves unemployed line' over the weekend.

 

Yet still they refuse to engage with the unions as 'they don't get involved in these employer/employee disputes'

 

They are responsible for this, you can see it from space, and all so they might get a bump in polling by flogging the sowing division card to a slow and painful death.

 

Cunts.

They want to do a Thatcher and try and make him look strong fighting the unions. It's why shapps repeated all weekend about the strike and the unions taking us back to the 70s. They're realising the fight with the EU over Northern Ireland means nothing to anyone this side of the Irish sea (which is why the protocol was put in there in the first place), so it's not having the impact of fighting with Europe they'd hoped. Rwanda fell pretty flat too. So here's something else they will try and throw in to create "it's us against the world, we are fighting for Britain" bullshit. 

[Bruce Spanner]

9 minutes ago, Barrington Womble said:

A super injunction is the only thing that makes sense as you'd expect the mirror and the guardian to be going with the story, even if it was only a story about a story. I've just had a look on the guardian website and I can't spot anything 

They want to do a Thatcher and try and make him look strong fighting the unions. It's why shapps repeated all weekend about the strike and the unions taking us back to the 70s. They're realising the fight with the EU over Northern Ireland means nothing to anyone this side of the Irish sea (which is why the protocol was put in there in the first place), so it's not having the impact of fighting with Europe they'd hoped. Rwanda fell pretty flat too. So here's something else they will try and throw in to create "it's us against the world, we are fighting for Britain" bullshit. 

The guardian is running it on the website, the story about the story disappearing which covers the original claims, though not prominently.

 

Maybe that’ll change during the day post press lobby briefing.

 

Oh, agreed, it’s so transparent, but I think they’ve made a huge mistake and left holes in their arguments by openly admitting they will not negotiate with the strikers, that keeps being hammered home and does nothing to dispel the mindset that they’re incompetent, dishonest and lazy.

[Barrington Womble]

27 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

The guardian is running it on the website, the story about the story disappearing which covers the original claims, though not prominently.

 

Maybe that’ll change during the day post press lobby briefing.

 

Oh, agreed, it’s so transparent, but I think they’ve made a huge mistake and left holes in their arguments by openly admitting they will not negotiate with the strikers, that keeps being hammered home and does nothing to dispel the mindset that they’re incompetent, dishonest and lazy.

Aye, but it plays the narrative the corbyns labour is alive and kicking, which is what they want. 

[Section_31]

It's on the great British public now to sort this. If he loses both by elections I don't see how he can hang on, the Tories' self interest won't let him. That's a big if though, as I suspect the dapper denizens of Blighty still consider him a lovable cad. 

[Barrington Womble]

17 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

It's on the great British public now to sort this. If he loses both by elections I don't see how he can hang on, the Tories' self interest won't let him. That's a big if though, as I suspect the dapper denizens of Blighty still consider him a lovable cad. 

As I said in the Starmer thread, I think he is just slowly chipping away at his own support. I do agree there are lots of cunts who still see him as the lovable cad, but I think the more time passes, he just does things that are the straw that breaks the camel's back. This week though is pretty big as I don't see how he survives if they get smashed twice. Too many of his own will just throw him under the bus. Although I wouldn't be shocked to see him throw a last roll of the dice and call a GE. 

[Gnasher]

They can't oust Johnson for a year and he is not going to resign. I'd also be very suprised if the Tories changed the rules to have another vote. 

 

If Starner/Labour had done better throughout England in the local elections more tory mps would have feared for their seats and Johnson would be out the door.

[Bruce Spanner]

23 minutes ago, Barrington Womble said:

As I said in the Starmer thread, I think he is just slowly chipping away at his own support. I do agree there are lots of cunts who still see him as the lovable cad, but I think the more time passes, he just does things that are the straw that breaks the camel's back. This week though is pretty big as I don't see how he survives if they get smashed twice. Too many of his own will just throw him under the bus. Although I wouldn't be shocked to see him throw a last roll of the dice and call a GE. 

 

Last week he gave the OK on breaking international law and threatening the GFA, saw Scotland try to force through another independence referendum. Saw his ethics advisor quiz after being asked to provide justification for breaking WHO tariff rules. Fled to the Ukraine for a photo op instead of seeing his 'Red Wall' tories, a trip he interrupted to deal with the messy fall out from a time, not even the first time, he'd given his mistress promises of money and power. He had said story removed by request. Seen his landmark Rwanda proposal DOA in the courts. Tried to extract us from the ERCH, a body he previously triumphed when the sun was shining. Been told by his ethics advisor that he should set out why he hasn't broken the ministerial code and resigned. Attacked the judiciary in an attempt to stoke the culture wars. Admitted he wil not negotiate with unions around strikes. Saw interest rates go up, saw prices go up, saw inflation projection rocket, saw a significant fall in the pound, saw a recession on the horizon, saw future growth scaled down etc etc.

 

Oh, also told in a report that Brexit was a financial disaster. 

 

That was just last week in the news and this is now the new normal with this cunt.

 

That camels back is made of stearn stuff...

[Gnasher]

Interesting the left in France put differences aside, formed a coalition and did very well in their elections yesterday.