Jump to content
Section_31

Boris Johnson

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

Is that the one he was fined for?


No fine.

 

The only fine he received was for the ‘cake ambush’ which was the least egregious of them all and shows it up for the farce it is.

 

The police had this photo by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:


No fine.

 

The only fine he received was for the ‘cake ambush’ which was the least egregious of them all and shows it up for the farce it is.

 

The police had this photo by the way.

How the fuck can he not be fined for that one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said:

 

F24442FB-6BE9-443F-8B39-E62BD1CF4705.jpeg

Seems totally fine to me, and anyway I've been told I don't care about this and that we should move on. So I have no opinion. 

 

Fucking cunts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

How the fuck can he not be fined for that one?


Either he lied about it to the police and parliament, others did the same, or the Met are complicit. 
 

Neither are good.

 

Looks like he played a high stakes game of chicken not knowing how bad the photos were and lost.

 

Fuck him.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Looks like throwing the staffers under the bus has back fired. 


I said above that I think he played chicken and lost not knowing how bad the pictures were. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PMQ's should be interesting. Although he'll probably just start ranting about beergate and bin collections or some shit the fucking fat drunken cunt 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to lawyer on twitter the reason he wasn't fined was because its his residency, the others were even though he instigated the leaving do. So a technicality?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you remember the early 90s when the IRA put mortars through the front window? Dunno why that popped into my head.

 

Michelle O'Neill with her big massive tits, say hello to my little friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/05/2022 at 15:38, cloggypop said:

He hates all of us. 

Just because he said he'd rather "let the bodies pile high" than take life-saving action, doesn't mean he hates us 

 

It means he has contempt for us and he would no more put in the effort to hate us than he would stir himself to hate a woodlouse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They have just played a clip of him specifically saying there was no party that day,in parliament. 

He will just deny it was a party and say it was simply a gathering of people with booze and snacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Just because he said he'd rather "let the bodies pile high" than take life-saving action, doesn't mean he hates us 

 

It means he has contempt for us and he would no more put in the effort to hate us than he would stir himself to hate a woodlouse.

Incidentally, the "let the bodies pile high" line - an implicit recognition that the choices are between effective lockdown or mass deaths - was the same month as this party.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

They have just played a clip of him specifically saying there was no party that day,in parliament. 

He will just deny it was a party and say it was simply a gathering of people with booze and snacks.

 

What he'll want to say now is that the Met investigation found he'd not committed an offence for this incident. Obviously the Gray report could throw that defence to the curb.

 

Serious questions need to be asked of the Met here too. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but it's becoming hard to avoid the conclusion that they are in league with the the Tories, or Johnson at least, and conspiring to do what they can to keep him out of trouble. let's not forget that they didn't even plan to launch an investigation until the pressure mounted, despite knowing from the outset that a number of parties had taken place in and around Downing St.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

What he'll want to say now is that the Met investigation found he'd not committed an offence for this incident. Obviously the Gray report could throw that defence to the curb.

 

Serious questions need to be asked of the Met here too. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but it's becoming hard to avoid the conclusion that they are in league with the the Tories, or Johnson at least, and conspiring to do what they can to keep him out of trouble. let's not forget that they didn't even plan to launch an investigation until the pressure mounted, despite knowing from the outset that a number of parties had taken place in and around Downing St.

 

 


Even if it is just massive incompetence, which they have a history of, the optics are fucking terrible.

 

They can’t possibly explain this away by saying it was a work event, as one person, at least, was fined for this party, or that it’s in his home as the rules were you couldn’t be indoors together at the time. 
 

There are at least five empties and a bottle of spirits in shot, that’s not a toast, unless he’s claimed he’s a scruffy cunt who didn’t tidy up after his last solo binge the previous evening.

 

Its going to take one hell of a justification to even begin to dispel concerns that they are in league with the fat, useless cunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×