Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Boris Johnson


Section_31
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:


No fine.

 

The only fine he received was for the ‘cake ambush’ which was the least egregious of them all and shows it up for the farce it is.

 

The police had this photo by the way.

How the fuck can he not be fined for that one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

How the fuck can he not be fined for that one?


Either he lied about it to the police and parliament, others did the same, or the Met are complicit. 
 

Neither are good.

 

Looks like he played a high stakes game of chicken not knowing how bad the photos were and lost.

 

Fuck him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/05/2022 at 15:38, cloggypop said:

He hates all of us. 

Just because he said he'd rather "let the bodies pile high" than take life-saving action, doesn't mean he hates us 

 

It means he has contempt for us and he would no more put in the effort to hate us than he would stir himself to hate a woodlouse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Just because he said he'd rather "let the bodies pile high" than take life-saving action, doesn't mean he hates us 

 

It means he has contempt for us and he would no more put in the effort to hate us than he would stir himself to hate a woodlouse.

Incidentally, the "let the bodies pile high" line - an implicit recognition that the choices are between effective lockdown or mass deaths - was the same month as this party.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

They have just played a clip of him specifically saying there was no party that day,in parliament. 

He will just deny it was a party and say it was simply a gathering of people with booze and snacks.

 

What he'll want to say now is that the Met investigation found he'd not committed an offence for this incident. Obviously the Gray report could throw that defence to the curb.

 

Serious questions need to be asked of the Met here too. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but it's becoming hard to avoid the conclusion that they are in league with the the Tories, or Johnson at least, and conspiring to do what they can to keep him out of trouble. let's not forget that they didn't even plan to launch an investigation until the pressure mounted, despite knowing from the outset that a number of parties had taken place in and around Downing St.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

What he'll want to say now is that the Met investigation found he'd not committed an offence for this incident. Obviously the Gray report could throw that defence to the curb.

 

Serious questions need to be asked of the Met here too. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but it's becoming hard to avoid the conclusion that they are in league with the the Tories, or Johnson at least, and conspiring to do what they can to keep him out of trouble. let's not forget that they didn't even plan to launch an investigation until the pressure mounted, despite knowing from the outset that a number of parties had taken place in and around Downing St.

 

 


Even if it is just massive incompetence, which they have a history of, the optics are fucking terrible.

 

They can’t possibly explain this away by saying it was a work event, as one person, at least, was fined for this party, or that it’s in his home as the rules were you couldn’t be indoors together at the time. 
 

There are at least five empties and a bottle of spirits in shot, that’s not a toast, unless he’s claimed he’s a scruffy cunt who didn’t tidy up after his last solo binge the previous evening.

 

Its going to take one hell of a justification to even begin to dispel concerns that they are in league with the fat, useless cunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...