Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.


Sugar Ape
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
On 27/07/2021 at 19:25, Bjornebye said:

I think they're still in bed with the tories 

I take this back. 

 

 

 

How unthinkable is a Lab/Lib-Dem coalition to get these Tory bastards out in the next election? 

 

 

I missed this news the other day. 

 

https://prc.org.uk/en/news/4288

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Creator Supreme said:

I wouldn't have known the answer, but fucking hell that's brilliant.

It might as well be Liberal Democrats. Who the fuck has ever seen more than one mole? Who sees multiple moles so often that they need a phrase other than "some moles" to describe them? And if that person exists, where do they find someone else so familiar with quantities of moles that they drop the phrase naturally into conversation and expect it to be understood?

 

I might have mentioned elsewhere that collective nouns annoy me, because most of them only exist for smart-arses to show off in quizzes.

 

When I say I want to see Parliament filled with Labour, it's got nothing to do with owls eating rodents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

A shocking reminder of the harm the austerity program pumped by Cameron/Osborne/Clegg/Duncan Smith and crew did to this country, 1 million kids,

 

"Vulnerable children unable to access help due to austerity, says inquiry | Children | The Guardian" https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2021/nov/19/vulnerable-children-unable-to-access-help-due-to-austerity-says-inquiry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Gnasher said:

If you thought the lib dems were partly responsible for Britain's disastrous austerity program you'd be wrong, it was that Jeremy Corbyn fella again. I take it Tim found the back bench tory mps more to his leaning,

 

 

Aah little Timmy, the homophobes homophobe! I'd say I've missed him, but he's a cunt so I haven't!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

9xa5zh1tafv21.jpg

I take it the silly pics are aimed at me for sharing a guardian article on how austerity affected one million children.

 

I can assure you cunty the photo on the left is nothing like me in any way shape or form but nice attempt at a dodge all the same. Oh and I prefer a darker tone of paint if you get my drift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...