Lib Dems

[ZonkoVille77]

Wait, she actually owns them now?

 

[moof]

7 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I have to admit, it’s not a particularly smart tactic to say you wouldn’t use them, even if you don’t use them. And if you’re not willing - in any circumstance - to use it in retaliation, potentially stopping others being nuked either in your country or others, then I don’t think you’re fit to be the one deciding. I’m probably in a minority on here but I absolutely want us to retain a nuclear deterrent. I also don’t want a PM to undermine that expensive deterrent by practically wiping out its meaning as a deterrent. 

I think there are some important questions about whether the idea of a deterrent is a legitimate reason to keep nuclear weapons. I personally think it’s a load of absolute bollocks and a complete myth that a nuclear deterrent keeps peace. I’m surprised to read a post like this from you 
 

https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/153_wilson.pdf

[Bjornebye]

2 minutes ago, A Red said:

Dont you fucking start

I'm fucking done 

[A Red]

Just now, Bjornebye said:

I'm fucking done 

And me

[moof]

6 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

You can't see why the UK wouldn't want those countries to have nuclear weapons? Do you know much about those countries? They're not the last countries that I want having them, but they're pretty far down the list of countries you want to either have the ability to launch nuclear strikes or to have the enhanced power that having those brings. 

Why? If the United States has a thousand nukes, and Russia has 500, why can’t Libya have one? If deterrent and all that stuff works, then surely every country should have one. Nobody would ever be attacked again 

[Bjornebye]

3 minutes ago, A Red said:

And me

Glad thats over. 

[Bjornebye]

Just lie and tell everyone we have got loads of big hard bastard fuck off nukes and we aren't afraid to use them on any-one who wants some. 

 

Then spend the money on putting roofs over peoples heads and food in peoples mouths. 

 

 

[moof]

10 minutes ago, moof said:

if you’re not willing - in any circumstance - to use it in retaliation, potentially stopping others being nuked either in your country or others, then I don’t think you’re fit to be the one deciding

This line of thinking genuinely baffles me 

[Jairzinho]

Can we not just be covered by the NATO nukes? How does our deterrent differ to that of Germany or Belgium?

 

And are people in Denmark and Portugal constantly shitting it that they haven't got any?

 

 

 

 

[Denny Crane]

Bollocks to nukes. 

 

[Denny Crane]

Even the pollsters are turning on them. Hopefully all associated with the Lib Dems will condemn this abuse to our democracy. Several named sources who are not involved with Labour have highlighted the irregularities over the past few days. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Red_or_Dead]

11 minutes ago, Denny Crane said:

Even the pollsters are turning on them. Hopefully all associated with the Lib Dems will condemn this abuse to our democracy. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where's Stronts to tell us that Flavible are wrong?!

 

 

[Bjornebye]

14 minutes ago, Red_or_Dead said:

Where's Stronts to tell us that Flavible are wrong?!

 

 

He will be along with some bollocks any minute. 

[Moo]

1 hour ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

Wait, she actually owns them now?

 

That CANNOT be real. 

[Bjornebye]

7 minutes ago, Moo said:

That CANNOT be real. 

Its not. This is the real one mate

 

 

 

[ZonkoVille77]

3 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Haven't we addressed the Flavible issue already? Whatever you think of their projections, they're clearly not "lies".

 

And I'd bet good dollars that Flavible's projections are nearer the mark than the 2017 results, which certain people seem to think are set in stone.

 

https://amp.businessinsider.com/lib-dems-accused-of-intentionally-misinforming-voters-with-leaflets-2019-11#click=https://t.co/HeGCClTkdP

 

Let's show your true party credentials here now that both YouGov and Flavible have come out against it. 

 

Note: it's ok to be wrong in life. It's ok to make mistakes. It's ok to to not defend the indefensible. 

[ZonkoVille77]

9 minutes ago, Moo said:

That CANNOT be real. 

 

It is 100% real.

 

https://twitter.com/LibDemPress/status/1192003069380300804?s=09

[Moo]

4 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Its not. This is the real one mate

 

 

 

Haha but surely not blue enough! 

[Moo]

3 minutes ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

 

It is 100% real.

 

https://twitter.com/LibDemPress/status/1192003069380300804?s=09

Then, Fuck. Me. 

 

edit:

It literally looks and reads like a fucking circus bus. 

[Bjornebye]

She may as well have got her tits out 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

https://fullfact.org/news/lib-dem-leaflet-false-quote/

 

But, I'm sure the Fib Dem cultist will be along in a minute to tell us that there's actually an explanation written in small white text on a white background which tells us that the Guardian didn't actually give the Fib Dems an endorsement and the words attributed to the Guardian were actually a quote of Swinson's words and the leaflet is perfectly clear, doesn't mislead or intend to do so and it's all really all our fault for being too thick to fully understand the subtle nuance of what the leaflet is actually saying. 

[cloggypop]

1 hour ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

Wait, she actually owns them now?

 

Snake On A Bus

[Bjornebye]

I'd have a lot more respect for SD (who I actually like as a poster on here away from his persona around politics) if he just said "Yeah thats a lie, bad move". 

 

He is completely incapable of it. Same with direct answers and his rabid hypocrisy. He genuinely should lead the Tory or Lib-Dem party. 

[Bjornebye]

2 minutes ago, cloggypop said:

Snake On A Bus

Lying Wank on a Charabanc. 

[Strontium]

Just now, Bjornebye said:

I'd have a lot more respect for SD (who I actually like as a poster on here away from his persona around politics) if he just said "Yeah thats a lie, bad move". 

 

He is completely incapable of it. Same with direct answers and his rabid hypocrisy. He genuinely should lead the Tory or Lib-Dem party. 

 

But it's not a "lie", is it. A lie is something which is untrue.

 

I am happy to admit that the Lib Dems are "misleading" people into thinking that Labour are coming third in places where Labour are coming third. Erm...