Lib Dems

[moof]

Yeah the stasi reference is very not analogous to this situation 

[SasaS]

Just now, moof said:

Yeah the stasi reference is very not analogous to this situation 

Allow me to quote Numero's usual retort, I disagree.

[aRdja]

2 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I'm not surprised.

There is no outrage and it's not about the Lib Dems candidate, sack away.

Why are we making excuses now for the racist twat? I’m sure it wouldn’t be too difficult a task for you guys to find a better candidate.

[Bjornebye]

Is SasaS a lib-dem? Fuck me no wonder. If it was a Labour MP the tory-lib-dems on this forum would be creaming over it and calling for the death penalty. 

[SasaS]

I don't even vote in the UK. 

And yes, if it was a Labour MP they would. Which was kind of my point. Obviously gone the way of the replacant  Roy Batty's moments.

[Strontium]

I must say I don't recall calling for the death penalty to be given to anyone.

[Bjornebye]

5 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

I must say I don't recall calling for the death penalty to be given to anyone.

Oh shut up you nob clearly I was exaggerating but still you get the point. 

[cloggypop]

1 hour ago, Bjornebye said:

Don't use the N word or mock the disabled and you should be relatively unworried about anyone reading something you have posted on a public platform.

Where's Annie Road standing? 

[Strontium]

If that rule is applied universally it deals a fatal blow to Kanye West's political ambitions, so I'm in.

[ZonkoVille77]

 

[Bjornebye]

6 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

If that rule is applied universally it deals a fatal blow to Kanye West's political ambitions, so I'm in.

Thats it crack a joke when its something abhorrent committed by the Libs. 

[Strontium]

"Abhorrent". Tweets that nobody even noticed for ten years, including when the same candidate stood in the same seat 2 years ago.

 

Looks like you forgot to turn Exaggeration Mode off.

[Bjornebye]

Using the N word and having a go at disabled people isn't abhorrent? Are you kidding me?

 

This from the divvy who cried to dave on the members thread because a stranger of the Internet said he would love to punch him. 

 

You haven't turned whiney little hypocrite mode off. 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Is that anti-black racism being played down again? 

 

I wouldn't dare make any accusations. I just highlight the coincidences.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

They've announced that shouty "Stop Brexit" megaphone man is standing as a Lib Dem candidate in Wales. 

[Bjornebye]

4 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

They've announced that shouty "Stop Brexit" megaphone man is standing as a Lib Dem candidate in Wales. 

A Lib-Dem I can believe in. 

[Bjornebye]

 

 

 

 

 

[aRdja]

8 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

 

 

Not a great look given her voting records.

 

 

[Strontium]

Selling state forests means development means deforestation means flooding. Must be a world record attempt on how many leaps of logic you can get into a single sentence.

[Bjornebye]

3 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Selling state forests means development means deforestation means flooding. Must be a world record attempt on how many leaps of logic you can get into a single sentence.

Ignoring the party cutting spending for flood planning there SD. How noble. 

[Strontium]

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

Ignoring the party cutting spending for flood planning there SD. How noble. 

 

The coalition increased spending on flood defences.

 

https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7514

 

Funding for flood defences has been the subject of political debate and scrutiny, particularly in relation to whether current Government is spending enough or more than previous Governments. Over the five years under the 2010 Coalition Government, flood defence expenditure did increase overall compared to the previous five-year period under Labour, but it was originally set to decrease. The eventual total spending under the Coalition Government was higher due to the additional funding provided at the end of the period in response to the winter floods 2013-14.

[Bjornebye]

Just now, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

The coalition increased spending on flood defences.

 

https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7514

 

 

 

Spending on reacting to floods is different to spending on flood defence. Had those floods not happened, spending would have decreased. 

 

So my statement about cutting spending was correct. 

 

Thanks again. 

[Strontium]

Just now, Bjornebye said:

Spending on reacting to floods is different to spending on flood defence. Had those floods not happened, spending would have decreased. 

 

So my statement about cutting spending was correct. 

 

Thanks again. 

 

Yeah, totally correct, except for the fact that it was opposite to the truth.

[Bjornebye]

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Yeah, totally correct, except for the fact that it was opposite to the truth.

You are weird. 

[Strontium]

I don't mind people holding the opinion that the coalition didn't spend enough on flood spending, it's a perfectly reasonably position to take, but it is factually incorrect to say that they cut flood spending. As I always say, you're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.