Jump to content
Neil G

Go fuck yourselves FSG

Recommended Posts

Daisy obviously had builders in during the lockdown to get the new extension done. Well, the roads were clear, no parking issues, so it's alright, innit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, aRdja said:

Not really a distraction, it’s just bog standard stuff. If you want to recognise the transfer fees over the period of the contracts then you’d be foolish to ignore depreciation and amortisation costs. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.  How much is D&A it if you don’t mind me asking? I want to understand if that’d help bridge this £174m gap you’re trying to explain.

I'm not trying to explain anything, I'm asking the same question I have for I don't know how many posts, where's the money go? I don't think there's clarity enough in the accounts for anyone to explain that (I haven't ready this year's in detail, but I have with other years), which is why I find it astonishing people defend the accounts. The bottom line is, we're 5th in the world rich list. We're always skint and barely give the manager a penny to spend. We somehow have a wage bill that is 15% higher than Manchester United, yet we don't ever seem to be able to compete on wages with them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Barrington Womble said:

I'm not trying to explain anything, I'm asking the same question I have for I don't know how many posts, where's the money go? I don't think there's clarity enough in the accounts for anyone to explain that (I haven't ready this year's in detail, but I have with other years), which is why I find it astonishing people defend the accounts. The bottom line is, we're 5th in the world rich list. We're always skint and barely give the manager a penny to spend. We somehow have a wage bill that is 15% higher than Manchester United, yet we don't ever seem to be able to compete on wages with them. 

I’m just trying work it out with you. You mentioned turnover was £500m and salary was £326m, and you don’t think the there isn’t enough clarity to explain the £174m gap. My hypothesis is depreciation and amortisation would explain a fair chunk. Do you know how much that is? Even from the previous year would be ok as a placeholder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Daisy said:

Amortisation is likely to be includee in the 171m administration expenses. 

 

Amortisation for 2020 was £115m.

 

Like for like comparisons below

 

Arsenal main costs

 

Cost of sales = 0

Player amortisation = 129

Staff costs = 234

Other = 78

 

Total = 441

 

Liverpool main Costs

 

Cost of sales = 63

Player amortisation = 115

Staff costs = 325

Other operating = 56

 

Total = 559

 

We are spending considerably more money than Arsenal on something outside of wages and player purchases. 

 

Approx 40 million more

 

119 million (63 + 56) vs 78 million 

 

 

 

Sorry I missed this, so basically the main variance driver is higher remuneration costs c.£100m. Given the state of our squad and management vs theirs and the fact the period covered us winning the CL finishing second in the league with the resulting incentive payments, it’s not that outrageous IMO. The rest is basically offsetting with net impact of £18m higher costs. We pay higher agent fees than most clubs so perhaps that’s one of the drivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, aRdja said:

Sorry I missed this, so basically the main variance driver is higher remuneration costs c.£100m. Given the state of our squad and management vs theirs and the fact the period covered us winning the CL finishing second in the league with the resulting incentive payments, it’s not that outrageous IMO. The rest is basically offsetting with net impact of £18m higher costs. We pay higher agent fees than most clubs so perhaps that’s one of the drivers.

No the cost difference is outside of renumeration 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Daisy said:

No the cost difference is outside of renumeration 

Just from your numbers you posted above, we spent c.£118m more than Arsenal, and salary cost is c.£100m higher, no? Or have you posted the numbers wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, aRdja said:

Just from your numbers you posted above, we spent c.£118m more than Arsenal, and salary cost is c.£100m higher, no? Or have you posted the numbers wrong?

No I havent posted them wrong read it again. We have 40 million extra costs on top of wages and player amortisation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Daisy said:

No I havent posted them wrong read it again. We have 40 million extra costs on top of wages and player amortisation. 

Okay let’s do it properly. We spent £118m higher than Arsenal which £91m can be explained by higher rem costs. Is your concern the rem costs being too high to be realistic or that we incurred £27m higher costs again outside of rem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, aRdja said:

Okay let’s do it properly. We spent £118m higher than Arsenal which £91m can be explained by higher rem costs. Is your concern the rem costs being too high to be realistic or that we incurred £27m higher costs again outside of rem?

See now that's a classic way of twisting figures to suit an argument. 

 

I clearly said if you remove wages and amortisation from the picture then our like for like costs are £40 million higher. 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Daisy said:

See now that's a classic way of twisting figures to suit an argument. 

 

I clearly said if you remove wages and amortisation from the picture then our like for like costs are £40 million higher. 

 

I have no position in this. I’m trying to confirm what yours is. So you’re okay with their amortisation costs being bigger than ours, and you’re fine with salary costs being significantly higher than theirs, but you’re annoyed that when you ringfence salary and amortisation (not sure why you would), outside of that we incurred £40m higher costs than Arsenal? What’s your hypothesis there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, aRdja said:

I have no position in this. I’m trying to confirm what yours is. So you’re okay with their amortisation costs being bigger than ours, and you’re fine with salary costs being significantly higher than theirs, but you’re annoyed that when you put salary and amortisation aside, we incurred £40m higher costs than Arsenal?

You a management accountant mate? You seem very keen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, aRdja said:

I have no position in this. I’m trying to confirm what yours is. So you’re okay with their amortisation costs being bigger than ours, and you’re fine with salary costs being significantly higher than theirs, but you’re annoyed that when you ringfence salary and amortisation (not sure why you would), outside of that we incurred £40m higher costs than Arsenal? What’s your hypothesis there?

It's not a hypothesis, they are plain numbers easy to see. 

 

We are a similar size club to arsenal, we should have similar operating expenses outside of paying staff and transfers. Yet ours are considerably more 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Daisy said:

It's not a hypothesis, they are plain numbers easy to see. 

 

We are a similar size club to arsenal, we should have similar operating expenses outside of paying staff and transfers. Yet ours are considerably more 

But that’s not the case right? Looks like we pay higher salaries than them. They probably have higher D&As because of their newer and larger stadium. They probably earn higher income per game as a result, but we probably earn higher overall turnover due to more game playing more total games, more CL games, and higher prize money, etc. There are loads of different factors. What was Arsenal’s bottom line I’m the same period out of interest? 

 

Just humour me for a minute, but what’s your theory behind this mysterious £40m higher costs Daisy?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • top casino sites
  • Posts

    • Saturday evening sees the Reds travel to West London to take on Brentford. It has been 32 years since the two teams met in a competitive fixture which was in the sixth round of the FA Cup and Liverpool won 4-0. And you have to go all the way back to 1947 for the last league fixture which adds a special sense of occasion to this encounter.     Thomas Frank’s side have looked anything but overawed by making the big step up to the Premier League  so far and their fans are bound to be in fine voice at Brentford Community stadium.   Dave Lane from @Beesotted Brentford gave TLW an insight into their unerring belief and how a Liverpool academy graduate has turned into a Bees fan favourite.   It is always good talking to fans of clubs who haven’t been in the top flight for a long period of time and learning about their journey. Can you talk a little bit about the ups and downs of your journey as a Brentford fan and what the moment felt like when you were finally promoted to the top flight after 74 years and that first Premier League game against Arsenal?   Getting promoted at Wembley was one of the most euphoric and surreal moments in out Brentford supporting lives… after so many failed play-off attempts there was a part of us all that never believed we’d witness it. That’s all behind us now, but it will never be forgotten. The build up to the game against Arsenal was amazing too, maybe more of an event than a match, but to be back in the stadium with our mates, and surrounded my likeminded Bees, was special… so was the atmosphere and result. It has given us belief and we know we aren’t out of our depth at this level.     Can you tell our readers about Thomas Frank. To a outsider he looks like a typical new age manager with clear methods and Football philosophy as well as a figure who can connect to fans and players alike How is he viewed by the Bees fanbase?   Thomas Frank is the perfect fit for Brentford and such a nice guy too. He’s certainly not an old school football manager and his relationship with the players shows how much they respect him, the perfect man for a young and promising set of pros, he keeps them grounded and focussed, as well as believing in them when things aren’t always going to plan. Frank has had his doubters, even as recently as last season, and he’s only ever a couple of defeats away from that element to start sharpening the knives again. Frank is the club’s most successful post war manager and the vast majority of supporters hope he’s at Brentford for many years to come.   Quite often new sides to the Premier League find the step up in standard quite daunting and the defence is extremely overworked. However for the Bees it has been remarkably resolute with three clean sheets from five games. Who are the key players behind that impressive statistic?   You’re right, so far we have been solid and well marshalled at the back, Pontus Jansson and Kristoffer Ajer in particular have been immense. Sergi Canos, although not a ‘natural’ right-back has risen to the challenge, and Rico Henry is, in my view, England standard at left-back. David Raya in goal has ironed out the more erratic edge to his play and is a proper sweeper-keeper with excellent distribution and reactions.     One of the longer-term members of the Brentford squad is a former Liverpool academy graduate in Sergi Canos. How important has he been to your progress over the years?   Sergi is another perfect fit at Brentford and as previously mentioned has stepped up this season and relished his chance in the top flight. After his initial loan period from Liverpool, he chose to move to Norwich, but he was soon back in West London where he has cemented a place as a modern club legend. He spent a long time out injured with a knee ligament injury and there were question marks as to whether he’d fully recover his speed, but his versatility and infectious enthusiasm are pivotal in the system we play. He loves Brentford as much as Brentford loves him.   We know that London is a crowded market for Premier League football teams. Is there one particular team that Brentford fans would love to beat or are they all in the enemy camp?   This season’s all about establishing our place at the top table and we will take our wins anywhere and against anyone, however, I’d be a liar if I didn’t want us to beat Chelsea as West London bragging rights over them would be immense. Without Fulham and QPR in the same division, though, a win is a win this campaign at least.     We touched on the clash against the Gunners at the beginning, how much are the fans looking forward to taking on one of Europe’s elite teams on Saturday evening?   Liverpool coming to Brentford is one of the jewels of the fixture list plain and simple. The players will want to prove themselves and the fans will want to savour every moment. Liverpool fans will be welcome in all our pubs and it should be a great afternoon on and off the pitch. Can’t wait!   Is there one Liverpool player that you admire the most?   Liverpool are a class act, Mo Salah, Sadio Mane, van Dijk, Diogo Jota, are all world class, and there’s a player in every position that will push us to the limit. But that’s why we are here, to test ourselves against the best. You’ll have plenty to contend with too.   How do you think your manager will set up the team for the big clash and who is the Brentford player that needs to lead from the front to claim a result?    Thomas Frank won’t change things at all in my view, we play our 3/5 at the back football the same whoever the opposition and we will go toe to toe, which may not work out in our favour after 90 minutes, but that’s our mindset. We will create big chances, but we have to take them when they come our way.   Have you got a score prediction?   My head says 3-1 Liverpool, my heart says 2-1 Brentford. I'll go with my heart every time! COYB.
      View full article
    • That could be a new phrase too. “that’s so Everton”.
    • Yep, to the point that my 9 year old has watched it with her mum and thinks it’s hilarious too, and when I learned that I thought “yeah, actually there’s nothing that needs to be censored for her to enjoy it”
    • Incidentally, here are some of those Tweets that don't exist.        
    • Ah, okay, when you called me a liar multiple times for saying that people were calling Starmer a Tory, that was what confused me.   So what we have instead is a disagreement over why people are calling Starmer a Tory. You have decided, apropos of nothing, that it's because of one small portion of his essay, whereas I assert that it relates to the thing taken as a whole and/or a different bit, which I have specifically seen people refer to.   If you want to talk about lies, let's start with the claim that anyone has said that the purpose of government is to support private businesses rather than people.
  • new UK casino
  • Topics

×